The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Debates |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/106523 |
Resumo: | This paper analyses the connection between the increasing inequality in Brazil and in the United States of America and the need for a welfare State in the twenty first century. On the first part, the consolidation of neoliberalism and the concentration of global wealth are described. On the second part, the crisis of welfare State in both countries and the proposals for a welfare State for the twenty first century are described. The juridical status of social rights is presented with their economic and political disputes, in an interdisciplinary approach. Therefore, the research holds an exploratory methodology, but also uses historical techniques from a critical theory perspective. The results indicate that the mediation of welfare State between capital and labor is weakening. However, there are still scholars and international organizations that support social rights in order to reduce inequality in this new century. |
id |
UFRGS-26_1e90a349f8612bd19a9736c479306180 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/106523 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-26 |
network_name_str |
Revista Debates |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of AmericaLa defensa del Estado social en Brasil y en los Estados Unidos de AméricaA defesa do Estado social no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos da AméricaDesigualdadeNeoliberalismoEstado Social.InequalityNeoliberalismWelfare State.DesigualdadNeoliberalismoEstado de Bienestar.This paper analyses the connection between the increasing inequality in Brazil and in the United States of America and the need for a welfare State in the twenty first century. On the first part, the consolidation of neoliberalism and the concentration of global wealth are described. On the second part, the crisis of welfare State in both countries and the proposals for a welfare State for the twenty first century are described. The juridical status of social rights is presented with their economic and political disputes, in an interdisciplinary approach. Therefore, the research holds an exploratory methodology, but also uses historical techniques from a critical theory perspective. The results indicate that the mediation of welfare State between capital and labor is weakening. However, there are still scholars and international organizations that support social rights in order to reduce inequality in this new century.Este artículo analiza la conexión entre la creciente desigualdad en Brasil y en los Estados Unidos de América y la necesidad de un Estado social en el siglo XXI. En la primera parte se describe la consolidación del neoliberalismo y la concentración de la riqueza global. En la segunda parte, se describe la crisis del Estado social en ambos países y las propuestas de un Estado social para el siglo XXI. El estatus jurídico de los derechos sociales se presenta con sus disputas económicas y políticas, en un enfoque interdisciplinario. Por tanto, la investigación tiene una metodología exploratoria, pero también utiliza técnicas históricas desde una perspectiva de teoría crítica. Los resultados indican que la mediación del Estado social entre capital y trabajo se está debilitando. Sin embargo, todavía hay académicos y organizaciones internacionales que apoyan los derechos sociales para reducir la desigualdad en este nuevo siglo.Este artigo analisa a relação entre o aumento da desigualdade no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos da América e a necessidade de um Estado social para o século XXI. Na primeira parte, estabelece-se uma relação entre a consolidação do neoliberalismo e a concentração da riqueza global. Na segunda parte, é feita a descrição da crise do Estado social nos dois países e são apresentadas as propostas de um Estado social para o século XXI. A definição da posição jurídica dos direitos sociais é analisada em conjunto com suas disputas políticas e econômicas, de forma interdisciplinar. Assim, a pesquisa guarda uma referência metodológica exploratória, ainda que se utilize de técnicas históricas e de uma perspectiva teórica marcadamente crítica. Os resultados apontam para uma diminuição da mediação do Estado social entre capital e trabalho. No entanto, estudos científicos e organizações internacionais ainda sustentam que os direitos sociais são centrais para a redução da desigualdade neste século.UFRGS2020-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/10652310.22456/1982-5269.106523Revista Debates; Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 117-195Revista Debates; v. 14 n. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 117-1951982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/106523/59704Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Debatesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFerreira, Gilberto Soaresda Luz, Cícero Krupp2020-12-18T19:51:06Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/106523Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2020-12-18T19:51:06Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America La defensa del Estado social en Brasil y en los Estados Unidos de América A defesa do Estado social no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos da América |
title |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America |
spellingShingle |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America Ferreira, Gilberto Soares Desigualdade Neoliberalismo Estado Social. Inequality Neoliberalism Welfare State. Desigualdad Neoliberalismo Estado de Bienestar. |
title_short |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America |
title_full |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America |
title_fullStr |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America |
title_full_unstemmed |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America |
title_sort |
The defense of the welfare State in Brazil and in the United States of America |
author |
Ferreira, Gilberto Soares |
author_facet |
Ferreira, Gilberto Soares da Luz, Cícero Krupp |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
da Luz, Cícero Krupp |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ferreira, Gilberto Soares da Luz, Cícero Krupp |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Desigualdade Neoliberalismo Estado Social. Inequality Neoliberalism Welfare State. Desigualdad Neoliberalismo Estado de Bienestar. |
topic |
Desigualdade Neoliberalismo Estado Social. Inequality Neoliberalism Welfare State. Desigualdad Neoliberalismo Estado de Bienestar. |
description |
This paper analyses the connection between the increasing inequality in Brazil and in the United States of America and the need for a welfare State in the twenty first century. On the first part, the consolidation of neoliberalism and the concentration of global wealth are described. On the second part, the crisis of welfare State in both countries and the proposals for a welfare State for the twenty first century are described. The juridical status of social rights is presented with their economic and political disputes, in an interdisciplinary approach. Therefore, the research holds an exploratory methodology, but also uses historical techniques from a critical theory perspective. The results indicate that the mediation of welfare State between capital and labor is weakening. However, there are still scholars and international organizations that support social rights in order to reduce inequality in this new century. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/106523 10.22456/1982-5269.106523 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/106523 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.22456/1982-5269.106523 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/106523/59704 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Debates info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Debates |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates; Vol. 14 Núm. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 117-195 Revista Debates; v. 14 n. 3 (2020): Partidos Políticos e Organização Partidária; 117-195 1982-5269 2236-479X reponame:Revista Debates instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Revista Debates |
collection |
Revista Debates |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808845566497521664 |