STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Madeira, Lígia Mori
Data de Publicação: 2014
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Debates
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49506
Resumo: The research aims to investigate the performance of the Brazilian Supreme Court as an actor who interferes in the formulation and implementation of social policies in Brazil, especially performing as veto player or acting as a partner of the Federal Executive in relation to programs and social policies. The research analyses judicial actions between 2003 and 2013, verifying aspects as legitimacy of actors, applications and substantive examination. It is possible to verify that the Brazilian judiciary has been an actor of constant intervention in this type of public policy, working mainly in the stages of implementation. However, it is possible to envision a new role for the judiciary in relation to the formulation of public policies, where criteria as the agenda-setting and the design of the intervention are part of the Judiciaries' new attributions.
id UFRGS-26_d0105a7be4d55378bf169c7db465171a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/49506
network_acronym_str UFRGS-26
network_name_str Revista Debates
repository_id_str
spelling STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013STF como ator político no Brasil: o papel do tribunal no julgamento de ações de políticas sociais entre 2003 e 2013JudiciaryJudicialization of PoliticsSocial PoliciesVeto or Governance.JudiciárioJudicialização da PolíticaPolíticas SociaisVeto ou Governança.The research aims to investigate the performance of the Brazilian Supreme Court as an actor who interferes in the formulation and implementation of social policies in Brazil, especially performing as veto player or acting as a partner of the Federal Executive in relation to programs and social policies. The research analyses judicial actions between 2003 and 2013, verifying aspects as legitimacy of actors, applications and substantive examination. It is possible to verify that the Brazilian judiciary has been an actor of constant intervention in this type of public policy, working mainly in the stages of implementation. However, it is possible to envision a new role for the judiciary in relation to the formulation of public policies, where criteria as the agenda-setting and the design of the intervention are part of the Judiciaries' new attributions.A pesquisa tem como objetivo investigar a atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal como um ator que interfere na formulação e implementação das políticas sociais no Brasil, especialmente atuando como ator com poder de veto ou agindo como um parceiro do Executivo Federal em relação aos programas e políticas sociais. A pesquisa analisa ações em julgamento entre os anos 2003 e 2013, verificando aspectos como a legitimidade dos atores, aplicações e mérito. É possível verificar que o Judiciário brasileiro tem sido um ator de intervenção constante neste tipo de política pública, atuando principalmente nas fases de execução. No entanto, é possível prever um novo papel para o tribuna em relação à formulação de políticas públicas, no qual critérios como a definição de agenda e o desenho da intervenção passam a fazer parte das novas atribuições do Poder Judiciário.UFRGS2014-12-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpesquisa qualitativaapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/4950610.22456/1982-5269.49506Revista Debates; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2014); 57-95Revista Debates; v. 8 n. 3 (2014); 57-951982-52692236-479Xreponame:Revista Debatesinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49506/32320Madeira, Lígia Moriinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-01-10T13:10:20Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/49506Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debatesPUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/debates/oai1982-52692236-479Xopendoar:2023-01-10T13:10:20Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
STF como ator político no Brasil: o papel do tribunal no julgamento de ações de políticas sociais entre 2003 e 2013
title STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
spellingShingle STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
Madeira, Lígia Mori
Judiciary
Judicialization of Politics
Social Policies
Veto or Governance.
Judiciário
Judicialização da Política
Políticas Sociais
Veto ou Governança.
title_short STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
title_full STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
title_fullStr STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
title_full_unstemmed STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
title_sort STF as a political actor in Brazil: the role of the Supreme Court in the judgement of social policies between 2003 and 2013
author Madeira, Lígia Mori
author_facet Madeira, Lígia Mori
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Madeira, Lígia Mori
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judiciary
Judicialization of Politics
Social Policies
Veto or Governance.
Judiciário
Judicialização da Política
Políticas Sociais
Veto ou Governança.
topic Judiciary
Judicialization of Politics
Social Policies
Veto or Governance.
Judiciário
Judicialização da Política
Políticas Sociais
Veto ou Governança.
description The research aims to investigate the performance of the Brazilian Supreme Court as an actor who interferes in the formulation and implementation of social policies in Brazil, especially performing as veto player or acting as a partner of the Federal Executive in relation to programs and social policies. The research analyses judicial actions between 2003 and 2013, verifying aspects as legitimacy of actors, applications and substantive examination. It is possible to verify that the Brazilian judiciary has been an actor of constant intervention in this type of public policy, working mainly in the stages of implementation. However, it is possible to envision a new role for the judiciary in relation to the formulation of public policies, where criteria as the agenda-setting and the design of the intervention are part of the Judiciaries' new attributions.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-12-19
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
pesquisa qualitativa
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49506
10.22456/1982-5269.49506
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49506
identifier_str_mv 10.22456/1982-5269.49506
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/debates/article/view/49506/32320
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRGS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Debates; Vol. 8 Núm. 3 (2014); 57-95
Revista Debates; v. 8 n. 3 (2014); 57-95
1982-5269
2236-479X
reponame:Revista Debates
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Revista Debates
collection Revista Debates
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Debates - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808845565388128256

Registros relacionados