Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Lúcia da
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Melero, Remédios, Caregnato, Sonia Elisa, Abadal, Ernest
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: spa
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270916
Resumo: Open review is one of the components of open science that scientific journals are incorporating in their editorial proces-ses. In contrast to open access to literature and research data, open review still raises many doubts and concerns among the involved parties (editors, reviewers and authors). This article aims to analyze the perception of editors of Brazilian academic journals on open peer review. To achieve this, a questionnaire was sent to 3,208 editors, out of which 351 responded to the full set of 42 questions. The editors expressed satisfaction with the current model of scientific commu-nication, the double-blind model, and disagreed with any type of identification of reviewers. However, they perceived an advantage in open review, as it allows for mutual interaction between authors and reviewers with the goal of improving the quality of content. As barriers, they pointed out conflicts of interest and rivalries that open review might generate and the difficulty in finding reviewers willing to accept this review model. The overall conclusion points to a conservative profile among editors regarding the introduction of open peer review practices.
id UFRGS-2_09bd0430e92b4a600fd3f52cccf682bc
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/270916
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Silveira, Lúcia daMelero, RemédiosCaregnato, Sonia ElisaAbadal, Ernest2024-01-12T03:29:27Z20231699-2407http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270916001193268Open review is one of the components of open science that scientific journals are incorporating in their editorial proces-ses. In contrast to open access to literature and research data, open review still raises many doubts and concerns among the involved parties (editors, reviewers and authors). This article aims to analyze the perception of editors of Brazilian academic journals on open peer review. To achieve this, a questionnaire was sent to 3,208 editors, out of which 351 responded to the full set of 42 questions. The editors expressed satisfaction with the current model of scientific commu-nication, the double-blind model, and disagreed with any type of identification of reviewers. However, they perceived an advantage in open review, as it allows for mutual interaction between authors and reviewers with the goal of improving the quality of content. As barriers, they pointed out conflicts of interest and rivalries that open review might generate and the difficulty in finding reviewers willing to accept this review model. The overall conclusion points to a conservative profile among editors regarding the introduction of open peer review practices.La revisión abierta es uno de los componentes de la ciencia abierta que las revistas científicas están incorporando en la gestión de los procesos editoriales. A diferencia del acceso abierto a las publicaciones o a los datos de investigación, la revisión abierta suscita aún dudas y recelos por parte de los agentes implicados (editores, revisores y autores). Este artí-culo tiene como objetivo analizar la percepción de los editores de revistas publicadas en Brasil sobre la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review). Para ello, se utilizó un cuestionario online de 42 preguntas que se envió a 3.208 editores, de los cuales contestaron 351. Los editores mostraron satisfacción por el modelo actual de comunicación científica, el modelo de revisión doble ciego, mostraron desacuerdo con la identificación de los revisores, aunque percibieronuna ventaja en que la revisión abierta permitiera la interacción mutua entre autores y revisores con el objetivo de mejorar la calidad de los conte-nidos.Como barreras, señalaron los conflictos de intereses y las rivalidades que la apertura de la revisión pudiera generar yla dificultad para encontrar revisores dispuestos a aceptar este modelo de revisión. La conclusión general apunta a un perfil conservador de los editores en lo que se refiere a la introducción de prácticas de apertura en la revisión.application/pdfspaProfesional de la información. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Vol. 32, n. 6 (2023), e320620Repositórios de dados de pesquisaCiência abertaDados abertosOpen peer reviewScientific editorsScientific journalsAcademic journalsScholarly journalsScholarly communicationOpen scienceSurveysActitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuestaAttitudes of the editors of brazilian scholarly journals toward open peer review: a surveyEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001193268.pdf.txt001193268.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain55417http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270916/2/001193268.pdf.txt8ee1ab352336caa41bcff5384cdc0bb3MD52ORIGINAL001193268.pdfTexto completo (espanhol)application/pdf3201568http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270916/1/001193268.pdf272434a4920ae346b450687d42f90a68MD5110183/2709162024-01-13 04:42:15.886571oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/270916Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-01-13T06:42:15Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv Attitudes of the editors of brazilian scholarly journals toward open peer review: a survey
title Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
spellingShingle Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
Silveira, Lúcia da
Repositórios de dados de pesquisa
Ciência aberta
Dados abertos
Open peer review
Scientific editors
Scientific journals
Academic journals
Scholarly journals
Scholarly communication
Open science
Surveys
title_short Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
title_full Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
title_fullStr Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
title_full_unstemmed Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
title_sort Actitudes de los editores de revistas académicas brasileñas hacia la revisión por pares abierta (open peer review) : una encuesta
author Silveira, Lúcia da
author_facet Silveira, Lúcia da
Melero, Remédios
Caregnato, Sonia Elisa
Abadal, Ernest
author_role author
author2 Melero, Remédios
Caregnato, Sonia Elisa
Abadal, Ernest
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, Lúcia da
Melero, Remédios
Caregnato, Sonia Elisa
Abadal, Ernest
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Repositórios de dados de pesquisa
Ciência aberta
Dados abertos
topic Repositórios de dados de pesquisa
Ciência aberta
Dados abertos
Open peer review
Scientific editors
Scientific journals
Academic journals
Scholarly journals
Scholarly communication
Open science
Surveys
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Open peer review
Scientific editors
Scientific journals
Academic journals
Scholarly journals
Scholarly communication
Open science
Surveys
description Open review is one of the components of open science that scientific journals are incorporating in their editorial proces-ses. In contrast to open access to literature and research data, open review still raises many doubts and concerns among the involved parties (editors, reviewers and authors). This article aims to analyze the perception of editors of Brazilian academic journals on open peer review. To achieve this, a questionnaire was sent to 3,208 editors, out of which 351 responded to the full set of 42 questions. The editors expressed satisfaction with the current model of scientific commu-nication, the double-blind model, and disagreed with any type of identification of reviewers. However, they perceived an advantage in open review, as it allows for mutual interaction between authors and reviewers with the goal of improving the quality of content. As barriers, they pointed out conflicts of interest and rivalries that open review might generate and the difficulty in finding reviewers willing to accept this review model. The overall conclusion points to a conservative profile among editors regarding the introduction of open peer review practices.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2024-01-12T03:29:27Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270916
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1699-2407
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001193268
identifier_str_mv 1699-2407
001193268
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270916
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv spa
language spa
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Profesional de la información. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Vol. 32, n. 6 (2023), e320620
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270916/2/001193268.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/270916/1/001193268.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 8ee1ab352336caa41bcff5384cdc0bb3
272434a4920ae346b450687d42f90a68
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225109103443968