Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707 |
Resumo: | AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 106 MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDPbiotin nick end labeling assay. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027). |
id |
UFRGS-2_221dc1f71628d122b2815f1e1a42ad5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/115707 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Gonçalves, Fabiany da CostaSchneider, NatáliaPinto, Fernanda OtesbelgueMeyer, Fabiola SchonsVisioli, FernandaPfaffenseller, BiancaLopez, Patrícia Luciana da CostaPassos, Eduardo PandolfiCirne Lima, Elizabeth ObinoMeurer, LuísePaz, Ana Helena da Rosa2015-05-01T01:57:59Z20142219-2840http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707000952068AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 106 MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDPbiotin nick end labeling assay. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027).application/pdfengWorld journal of gastroenterology. Beijing. Vol. 20, no. 48 (Dec. 2014), p. 18228-18239Colite ulcerativaCélulas-tronco mesenquimaisDoenças inflamatórias intestinaisInjeções intravenosasUlcerative colitisDextran sulfate sodiumInflammatory bowel diseaseMesenchymal stem cellCell transplantationIntravenous injectionImmunomodulationIntravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000952068.pdf000952068.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1439305http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/1/000952068.pdfbfa3ef1be62884577bd525db3c04a375MD51TEXT000952068.pdf.txt000952068.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain49415http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/2/000952068.pdf.txt54b191f0cab476dc4b4f7f84202836ffMD52THUMBNAIL000952068.pdf.jpg000952068.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2483http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/3/000952068.pdf.jpg83c8fd2f016c7b86c50a2dd59dd92161MD5310183/1157072021-05-07 04:46:24.365685oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/115707Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-05-07T07:46:24Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
title |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
spellingShingle |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa Colite ulcerativa Células-tronco mesenquimais Doenças inflamatórias intestinais Injeções intravenosas Ulcerative colitis Dextran sulfate sodium Inflammatory bowel disease Mesenchymal stem cell Cell transplantation Intravenous injection Immunomodulation |
title_short |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
title_full |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
title_fullStr |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
title_sort |
Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis? |
author |
Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa |
author_facet |
Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa Schneider, Natália Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue Meyer, Fabiola Schons Visioli, Fernanda Pfaffenseller, Bianca Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino Meurer, Luíse Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schneider, Natália Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue Meyer, Fabiola Schons Visioli, Fernanda Pfaffenseller, Bianca Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino Meurer, Luíse Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa Schneider, Natália Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue Meyer, Fabiola Schons Visioli, Fernanda Pfaffenseller, Bianca Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino Meurer, Luíse Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Colite ulcerativa Células-tronco mesenquimais Doenças inflamatórias intestinais Injeções intravenosas |
topic |
Colite ulcerativa Células-tronco mesenquimais Doenças inflamatórias intestinais Injeções intravenosas Ulcerative colitis Dextran sulfate sodium Inflammatory bowel disease Mesenchymal stem cell Cell transplantation Intravenous injection Immunomodulation |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Ulcerative colitis Dextran sulfate sodium Inflammatory bowel disease Mesenchymal stem cell Cell transplantation Intravenous injection Immunomodulation |
description |
AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 106 MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDPbiotin nick end labeling assay. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027). |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-01T01:57:59Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2219-2840 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000952068 |
identifier_str_mv |
2219-2840 000952068 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
World journal of gastroenterology. Beijing. Vol. 20, no. 48 (Dec. 2014), p. 18228-18239 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/1/000952068.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/2/000952068.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/3/000952068.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
bfa3ef1be62884577bd525db3c04a375 54b191f0cab476dc4b4f7f84202836ff 83c8fd2f016c7b86c50a2dd59dd92161 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447580634513408 |