Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Schneider, Natália, Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue, Meyer, Fabiola Schons, Visioli, Fernanda, Pfaffenseller, Bianca, Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa, Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi, Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino, Meurer, Luíse, Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707
Resumo: AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 106 MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDPbiotin nick end labeling assay. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027).
id UFRGS-2_221dc1f71628d122b2815f1e1a42ad5f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/115707
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Gonçalves, Fabiany da CostaSchneider, NatáliaPinto, Fernanda OtesbelgueMeyer, Fabiola SchonsVisioli, FernandaPfaffenseller, BiancaLopez, Patrícia Luciana da CostaPassos, Eduardo PandolfiCirne Lima, Elizabeth ObinoMeurer, LuísePaz, Ana Helena da Rosa2015-05-01T01:57:59Z20142219-2840http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707000952068AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 106 MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDPbiotin nick end labeling assay. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027).application/pdfengWorld journal of gastroenterology. Beijing. Vol. 20, no. 48 (Dec. 2014), p. 18228-18239Colite ulcerativaCélulas-tronco mesenquimaisDoenças inflamatórias intestinaisInjeções intravenosasUlcerative colitisDextran sulfate sodiumInflammatory bowel diseaseMesenchymal stem cellCell transplantationIntravenous injectionImmunomodulationIntravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000952068.pdf000952068.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1439305http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/1/000952068.pdfbfa3ef1be62884577bd525db3c04a375MD51TEXT000952068.pdf.txt000952068.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain49415http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/2/000952068.pdf.txt54b191f0cab476dc4b4f7f84202836ffMD52THUMBNAIL000952068.pdf.jpg000952068.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2483http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/3/000952068.pdf.jpg83c8fd2f016c7b86c50a2dd59dd92161MD5310183/1157072021-05-07 04:46:24.365685oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/115707Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-05-07T07:46:24Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
title Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
spellingShingle Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa
Colite ulcerativa
Células-tronco mesenquimais
Doenças inflamatórias intestinais
Injeções intravenosas
Ulcerative colitis
Dextran sulfate sodium
Inflammatory bowel disease
Mesenchymal stem cell
Cell transplantation
Intravenous injection
Immunomodulation
title_short Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
title_full Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
title_fullStr Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
title_sort Intravenous vs intraperitoneal mesenchymal stem cells administration : what is the best route for treating experimental colitis?
author Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa
author_facet Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa
Schneider, Natália
Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue
Meyer, Fabiola Schons
Visioli, Fernanda
Pfaffenseller, Bianca
Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa
Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi
Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino
Meurer, Luíse
Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa
author_role author
author2 Schneider, Natália
Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue
Meyer, Fabiola Schons
Visioli, Fernanda
Pfaffenseller, Bianca
Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa
Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi
Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino
Meurer, Luíse
Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Fabiany da Costa
Schneider, Natália
Pinto, Fernanda Otesbelgue
Meyer, Fabiola Schons
Visioli, Fernanda
Pfaffenseller, Bianca
Lopez, Patrícia Luciana da Costa
Passos, Eduardo Pandolfi
Cirne Lima, Elizabeth Obino
Meurer, Luíse
Paz, Ana Helena da Rosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colite ulcerativa
Células-tronco mesenquimais
Doenças inflamatórias intestinais
Injeções intravenosas
topic Colite ulcerativa
Células-tronco mesenquimais
Doenças inflamatórias intestinais
Injeções intravenosas
Ulcerative colitis
Dextran sulfate sodium
Inflammatory bowel disease
Mesenchymal stem cell
Cell transplantation
Intravenous injection
Immunomodulation
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Ulcerative colitis
Dextran sulfate sodium
Inflammatory bowel disease
Mesenchymal stem cell
Cell transplantation
Intravenous injection
Immunomodulation
description AIM: To investigate the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) transplanted intraperitoneally and intravenously in a murine model of colitis. METHODS: MSCs were isolated from C57BL/6 mouse adipose tissue. MSC cultures were analyzed according to morphology, cellular differentiation potential, and surface molecular markers. Experimental acute colitis was induced in C57BL/6 mice by oral administration of 2% dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) in drinking water ad libitum from days 0 to 7. Colitis mice were treated with 1 × 106 MSCs via intraperitoneal or intravenous injection on days 2 and 5. The disease activity index was determined daily based on the following parameters: weight loss, stool consistency and presence of blood in the feces and anus. To compare morphological and functional differences in tissue regeneration between different MSC injection modalities, mice were euthanized on day 8, and their colons were examined for length, weight, and histopathological changes. Inflammatory responses were determined by measuring the levels of different serum cytokines using a CBA Th1/Th2/Th17 kit. Apoptotic rates were evaluated by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUDPbiotin nick end labeling assay. RESULTS: Intravenous infusion of MSCs was more effective than intraperitoneal treatment (P < 0.001) in reducing the clinical and histopathologic severity of colitis, which includes weight loss, diarrhea and inflammation. An histological evaluation demonstrated decreased colonic inflammation based on reduced crypt loss and reduced infiltration of inflammatory cells. This therapeutic effect was most likely mediated by the down-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines [interleukin (IL)-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)]; and by the up-regulation of anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and IL-4). Intravenous transplantation also induced high levels of IFN that lead to activation of the immunosuppressive activity of the MSCs, which did not occur with intraperitoneal transplantation (P = 0.006). An increase in apoptotic T cells was observed after intravenous, but not intraperitoneal, MSC infusion, suggesting that MSCs can induce apoptosis in resistant T cells in colonic inflammation (P = 0.027).
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-05-01T01:57:59Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2219-2840
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000952068
identifier_str_mv 2219-2840
000952068
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115707
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv World journal of gastroenterology. Beijing. Vol. 20, no. 48 (Dec. 2014), p. 18228-18239
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/1/000952068.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/2/000952068.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115707/3/000952068.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv bfa3ef1be62884577bd525db3c04a375
54b191f0cab476dc4b4f7f84202836ff
83c8fd2f016c7b86c50a2dd59dd92161
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447580634513408