Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Portinho, Ciro Paz
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Santos, Luis Alberto dos, Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt, Rivero, Raquel Camara, Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197
Resumo: ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria.
id UFRGS-2_5a8cd9bdb08341ac4261b5ba4fcf3993
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/147197
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Portinho, Ciro PazSantos, Luis Alberto dosCerski, Carlos Thadeu SchmidtRivero, Raquel CamaraCollares, Marcus Vinicius Martins2016-08-13T02:15:54Z20140102-8650http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197000990792ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria.application/pdfengActa cirúrgica brasileira. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 29, no. 10 (Oct. 2014), p. 622-632Osso e ossosEngenharia de tecidosBone and bonesBone transplantationTissue engineeringBone matrixCraniofacial abnormalitiesMiceCranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in miceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000990792.pdf000990792.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1805853http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/1/000990792.pdfecb583e9c74f147933f9ac3ba60466d2MD51TEXT000990792.pdf.txt000990792.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain43636http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/2/000990792.pdf.txtbef629731b79ded68cc77f5b4597e341MD52THUMBNAIL000990792.pdf.jpg000990792.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1829http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/3/000990792.pdf.jpg6fc02521cc767fd0e9c187770462c405MD5310183/1471972018-10-29 08:34:36.252oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/147197Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-29T11:34:36Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
title Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
spellingShingle Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
Portinho, Ciro Paz
Osso e ossos
Engenharia de tecidos
Bone and bones
Bone transplantation
Tissue engineering
Bone matrix
Craniofacial abnormalities
Mice
title_short Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
title_full Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
title_fullStr Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
title_full_unstemmed Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
title_sort Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
author Portinho, Ciro Paz
author_facet Portinho, Ciro Paz
Santos, Luis Alberto dos
Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt
Rivero, Raquel Camara
Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins
author_role author
author2 Santos, Luis Alberto dos
Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt
Rivero, Raquel Camara
Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Portinho, Ciro Paz
Santos, Luis Alberto dos
Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt
Rivero, Raquel Camara
Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Osso e ossos
Engenharia de tecidos
topic Osso e ossos
Engenharia de tecidos
Bone and bones
Bone transplantation
Tissue engineering
Bone matrix
Craniofacial abnormalities
Mice
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Bone and bones
Bone transplantation
Tissue engineering
Bone matrix
Craniofacial abnormalities
Mice
description ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-08-13T02:15:54Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0102-8650
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000990792
identifier_str_mv 0102-8650
000990792
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Acta cirúrgica brasileira. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 29, no. 10 (Oct. 2014), p. 622-632
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/1/000990792.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/2/000990792.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/3/000990792.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ecb583e9c74f147933f9ac3ba60466d2
bef629731b79ded68cc77f5b4597e341
6fc02521cc767fd0e9c187770462c405
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447620886200320