Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria. |
id |
UFRGS-2_5a8cd9bdb08341ac4261b5ba4fcf3993 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/147197 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Portinho, Ciro PazSantos, Luis Alberto dosCerski, Carlos Thadeu SchmidtRivero, Raquel CamaraCollares, Marcus Vinicius Martins2016-08-13T02:15:54Z20140102-8650http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197000990792ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria.application/pdfengActa cirúrgica brasileira. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 29, no. 10 (Oct. 2014), p. 622-632Osso e ossosEngenharia de tecidosBone and bonesBone transplantationTissue engineeringBone matrixCraniofacial abnormalitiesMiceCranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in miceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000990792.pdf000990792.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1805853http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/1/000990792.pdfecb583e9c74f147933f9ac3ba60466d2MD51TEXT000990792.pdf.txt000990792.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain43636http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/2/000990792.pdf.txtbef629731b79ded68cc77f5b4597e341MD52THUMBNAIL000990792.pdf.jpg000990792.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1829http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/3/000990792.pdf.jpg6fc02521cc767fd0e9c187770462c405MD5310183/1471972018-10-29 08:34:36.252oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/147197Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-29T11:34:36Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
title |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
spellingShingle |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice Portinho, Ciro Paz Osso e ossos Engenharia de tecidos Bone and bones Bone transplantation Tissue engineering Bone matrix Craniofacial abnormalities Mice |
title_short |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
title_full |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
title_fullStr |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
title_full_unstemmed |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
title_sort |
Cranial vault reconstruction with bone morphogenetic protein, calcium phosphate, acellular dermal matrix, and calcium alginate in mice |
author |
Portinho, Ciro Paz |
author_facet |
Portinho, Ciro Paz Santos, Luis Alberto dos Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt Rivero, Raquel Camara Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Luis Alberto dos Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt Rivero, Raquel Camara Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Portinho, Ciro Paz Santos, Luis Alberto dos Cerski, Carlos Thadeu Schmidt Rivero, Raquel Camara Collares, Marcus Vinicius Martins |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Osso e ossos Engenharia de tecidos |
topic |
Osso e ossos Engenharia de tecidos Bone and bones Bone transplantation Tissue engineering Bone matrix Craniofacial abnormalities Mice |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Bone and bones Bone transplantation Tissue engineering Bone matrix Craniofacial abnormalities Mice |
description |
ABSTRACTPURPOSE: To evaluate experimental cranial vault reconstructions, by combining bone morphogenetic protein type 2 (BMP-2) and different matrices.METHODS: Fourty-nine animals were initially included (seven per group). We designed an experimental, open, prospective and comparative study, divided in seven groups: 1 – BMP-2+calcium phosphate (BT); 2 – BMP-2+acellular dermal matrix (BM); 3 – BMP-2+calcium alginate (BA); 4 – TCP; 5 – MDM; 6 – ALG; 7 – Bone autograft (BAG). A bone failure was created in left parietal bone of adult male mice. At the same procedure reconstruction was performed. After five weeks, animals were sacrificed, and reconstruction area was removed to histological analysis. After exclusion due to death or infection, thirty-eight animals were evaluated (BT=5; BM=6; BA=6; TCP=7; MDM=3; ALG=6; BAG=5).RESULTS: A higher incidence of infection has occurred in MDM group (57%, P=0.037). In cortical fusion, groups BAG, TCP, and BMP-2+TCP (BT) obtained the best scores, comparing to the others (P=0.00846). In new bone formation, groups BT, BAG, and TCP have presented the best scores (P=0.00835). When neovascularization was considered, best groups were BMP-2+MDM (BM), BMP-2+ALG (BA), TCP, and MDM (P=0.001695). BAG group was the best in bone marrow formation, followed by groups BT and TCP (P=0.008317). CONCLUSIONS: Bone morphogenetic protein type 2 increased bone regeneration in experimental skull reconstruction, especially when combined to calcium phosphate. Such association was even comparable to bone autograft, the gold-standard treatment, in some histological criteria. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-08-13T02:15:54Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
0102-8650 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000990792 |
identifier_str_mv |
0102-8650 000990792 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/147197 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Acta cirúrgica brasileira. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 29, no. 10 (Oct. 2014), p. 622-632 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/1/000990792.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/2/000990792.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/147197/3/000990792.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
ecb583e9c74f147933f9ac3ba60466d2 bef629731b79ded68cc77f5b4597e341 6fc02521cc767fd0e9c187770462c405 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447620886200320 |