Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area :
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/184022 |
Resumo: | In Brazil, distance education plays an important role in the training of human resources in the health area. In this context, learning objects, understood as modular digital resources used to support learning, are widely used tools in the process of knowledge construction, although not all are valid resources. To date, the literature does not have a specific instrument in Portuguese to evaluate the quality of learning objects in the health area. In order to fill this gap, this paper describes the search for evidence of validity of internal structure and convergent validity of Equalis-OAS: Scale to evaluate the quality of learning objects in the health area. For the study, Equalis-OAS was applied to professionals and undergraduate students from the different areas of Health Sciences, all participants taking a continuing education health course about Food and Nutrition in Primary Health Care. One thousand and sixty-nine volunteers participated in the study. An Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed that the instrument, which has as its construct “Quality of learning objects for the health area”, covers three dimensions: “Intrinsic Concepts of Learning Objects in the Health Area”, “Educational Characteristics” and “Presentation”. The final instrument consisted of 41 items, which explained 66.8% of the total variance of the scores. The scale had excellent internal consistency indexes (overall scale: α = 0.979; “Intrinsic Concepts of Learning Objects”: α = 0.927; “Educational”: α = 0.947; “Presentation”: α = 0.977). Regarding convergent validation, Pearson’s correlation indicated that Equalis-OAS had a moderate correlation (r=0.59, p<0.01) with LORI version 2.0, translated into Portuguese, an instrument for the evaluation of learning objects in general (i.e., not specific to the health area). These results indicate that Equalis-OAS is an instrument that presents good evidence of validity, indicating its use in the context of health education and research. |
id |
UFRGS-2_7226e49cfeb3bfada70992f82f427bdc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/184022 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Trindade, Carolina SturmKato,Sergio KakutaD'Avila, Otávio PereiraSiqueira, Ana Célia da SilvaUmpierre, Roberto NunesCorrea, Ana Paula BorngraberDahmer, AlessandraReppold, Caroline Tozzi2018-10-27T03:12:20Z20182411-2933http://hdl.handle.net/10183/184022001078547In Brazil, distance education plays an important role in the training of human resources in the health area. In this context, learning objects, understood as modular digital resources used to support learning, are widely used tools in the process of knowledge construction, although not all are valid resources. To date, the literature does not have a specific instrument in Portuguese to evaluate the quality of learning objects in the health area. In order to fill this gap, this paper describes the search for evidence of validity of internal structure and convergent validity of Equalis-OAS: Scale to evaluate the quality of learning objects in the health area. For the study, Equalis-OAS was applied to professionals and undergraduate students from the different areas of Health Sciences, all participants taking a continuing education health course about Food and Nutrition in Primary Health Care. One thousand and sixty-nine volunteers participated in the study. An Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed that the instrument, which has as its construct “Quality of learning objects for the health area”, covers three dimensions: “Intrinsic Concepts of Learning Objects in the Health Area”, “Educational Characteristics” and “Presentation”. The final instrument consisted of 41 items, which explained 66.8% of the total variance of the scores. The scale had excellent internal consistency indexes (overall scale: α = 0.979; “Intrinsic Concepts of Learning Objects”: α = 0.927; “Educational”: α = 0.947; “Presentation”: α = 0.977). Regarding convergent validation, Pearson’s correlation indicated that Equalis-OAS had a moderate correlation (r=0.59, p<0.01) with LORI version 2.0, translated into Portuguese, an instrument for the evaluation of learning objects in general (i.e., not specific to the health area). These results indicate that Equalis-OAS is an instrument that presents good evidence of validity, indicating its use in the context of health education and research.application/pdfengInternational journal for innovation education and research. Dhaka. Vol. 6, no. 8 (2018), p. 15-27Educação em saúdeEducação a distânciaMateriais de ensinoEstudo de validaçãoPsicometriaTeaching materialsDistance educationHealth educationValidation studiesPsychometricsEvaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area :Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001078547.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf508499http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/184022/1/001078547.pdfc4d1cc7115bf30f5e8b72eb4ec254618MD51TEXT001078547.pdf.txt001078547.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain43515http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/184022/2/001078547.pdf.txtade09f1fd0a0fdaca40d4b8d73477680MD52THUMBNAIL001078547.pdf.jpg001078547.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2036http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/184022/3/001078547.pdf.jpg0ccc5c8aec2046c4b98531c2af516ca3MD5310183/1840222023-10-28 03:31:51.642119oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/184022Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-10-28T06:31:51Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
title |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : Trindade, Carolina Sturm Educação em saúde Educação a distância Materiais de ensino Estudo de validação Psicometria Teaching materials Distance education Health education Validation studies Psychometrics |
title_short |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
title_full |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the quality of learning objects in the health care area : |
author |
Trindade, Carolina Sturm |
author_facet |
Trindade, Carolina Sturm Kato,Sergio Kakuta D'Avila, Otávio Pereira Siqueira, Ana Célia da Silva Umpierre, Roberto Nunes Correa, Ana Paula Borngraber Dahmer, Alessandra Reppold, Caroline Tozzi |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kato,Sergio Kakuta D'Avila, Otávio Pereira Siqueira, Ana Célia da Silva Umpierre, Roberto Nunes Correa, Ana Paula Borngraber Dahmer, Alessandra Reppold, Caroline Tozzi |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Trindade, Carolina Sturm Kato,Sergio Kakuta D'Avila, Otávio Pereira Siqueira, Ana Célia da Silva Umpierre, Roberto Nunes Correa, Ana Paula Borngraber Dahmer, Alessandra Reppold, Caroline Tozzi |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Educação em saúde Educação a distância Materiais de ensino Estudo de validação Psicometria |
topic |
Educação em saúde Educação a distância Materiais de ensino Estudo de validação Psicometria Teaching materials Distance education Health education Validation studies Psychometrics |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Teaching materials Distance education Health education Validation studies Psychometrics |
description |
In Brazil, distance education plays an important role in the training of human resources in the health area. In this context, learning objects, understood as modular digital resources used to support learning, are widely used tools in the process of knowledge construction, although not all are valid resources. To date, the literature does not have a specific instrument in Portuguese to evaluate the quality of learning objects in the health area. In order to fill this gap, this paper describes the search for evidence of validity of internal structure and convergent validity of Equalis-OAS: Scale to evaluate the quality of learning objects in the health area. For the study, Equalis-OAS was applied to professionals and undergraduate students from the different areas of Health Sciences, all participants taking a continuing education health course about Food and Nutrition in Primary Health Care. One thousand and sixty-nine volunteers participated in the study. An Exploratory Factor Analysis revealed that the instrument, which has as its construct “Quality of learning objects for the health area”, covers three dimensions: “Intrinsic Concepts of Learning Objects in the Health Area”, “Educational Characteristics” and “Presentation”. The final instrument consisted of 41 items, which explained 66.8% of the total variance of the scores. The scale had excellent internal consistency indexes (overall scale: α = 0.979; “Intrinsic Concepts of Learning Objects”: α = 0.927; “Educational”: α = 0.947; “Presentation”: α = 0.977). Regarding convergent validation, Pearson’s correlation indicated that Equalis-OAS had a moderate correlation (r=0.59, p<0.01) with LORI version 2.0, translated into Portuguese, an instrument for the evaluation of learning objects in general (i.e., not specific to the health area). These results indicate that Equalis-OAS is an instrument that presents good evidence of validity, indicating its use in the context of health education and research. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-27T03:12:20Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/184022 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2411-2933 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001078547 |
identifier_str_mv |
2411-2933 001078547 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/184022 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
International journal for innovation education and research. Dhaka. Vol. 6, no. 8 (2018), p. 15-27 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/184022/1/001078547.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/184022/2/001078547.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/184022/3/001078547.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
c4d1cc7115bf30f5e8b72eb4ec254618 ade09f1fd0a0fdaca40d4b8d73477680 0ccc5c8aec2046c4b98531c2af516ca3 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447672524374016 |