Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/206333 |
Resumo: | Introduction: Campylobacteriosis is considered the most common bacteria-caused human gastroenteritis in the world. Poultry is a major reservoir of Campylobacter. Human infection may occur by consumption of raw and undercooked poultry or by contamination of other foods by these items. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in poultry processing plants with conventional culture method and real-time PCR. Methodology: A total of 108 poultry processing plant samples were collected to test with conventional microbiology and qPCR. Sampling included cloacal swabs, swabs of transport crates (before and after the cleaning and disinfection process) and carcasses (after the chiller, cooled at 4°C and frozen at −12°C). Results: Positivity in cloacal swabs indicated that poultry arrived contaminated at the slaughterhouse. Contamination in transport cages was substantially increased after the cleaning process, indicating that the process was ineffective. The detection of Campylobacter on carcasses was higher than that on cloacal swabs, which could indicate cross-contamination during the slaughtering process. Conventional microbiology and molecular methods revealed a prevalence of 69.4% and 43.5%, respectively. Lower detection by qPCR can be attributed to the high specificity of the kit and to biological components that could inhibit PCR reactions. Conclusions: Our results indicate that poultry arrive contaminated at the slaughterhouse and that contamination can increase during the slaughtering process due to cross-contamination. The isolation of Campylobacter in cooled and frozen carcasses corroborates the bacterial survival even at temperatures considered limiting to bacterial growth which are routinely used for food preservation. |
id |
UFRGS-2_86afa23862907c81a1dde49b829dfa98 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/206333 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Borges, Karen ApellanisCisco, Isabel CristinaFurian, Thales QuediTedesco, Denise CristinaRodrigues, Laura BeatrizNascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro doSantos, Luciana Ruschel dos2020-02-28T04:07:06Z20201972-2680http://hdl.handle.net/10183/206333001112371Introduction: Campylobacteriosis is considered the most common bacteria-caused human gastroenteritis in the world. Poultry is a major reservoir of Campylobacter. Human infection may occur by consumption of raw and undercooked poultry or by contamination of other foods by these items. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in poultry processing plants with conventional culture method and real-time PCR. Methodology: A total of 108 poultry processing plant samples were collected to test with conventional microbiology and qPCR. Sampling included cloacal swabs, swabs of transport crates (before and after the cleaning and disinfection process) and carcasses (after the chiller, cooled at 4°C and frozen at −12°C). Results: Positivity in cloacal swabs indicated that poultry arrived contaminated at the slaughterhouse. Contamination in transport cages was substantially increased after the cleaning process, indicating that the process was ineffective. The detection of Campylobacter on carcasses was higher than that on cloacal swabs, which could indicate cross-contamination during the slaughtering process. Conventional microbiology and molecular methods revealed a prevalence of 69.4% and 43.5%, respectively. Lower detection by qPCR can be attributed to the high specificity of the kit and to biological components that could inhibit PCR reactions. Conclusions: Our results indicate that poultry arrive contaminated at the slaughterhouse and that contamination can increase during the slaughtering process due to cross-contamination. The isolation of Campylobacter in cooled and frozen carcasses corroborates the bacterial survival even at temperatures considered limiting to bacterial growth which are routinely used for food preservation.application/pdfengJournal of Infection in Developing Countries. [Sassari, Italy]. Vol. 14, no. 1 (Jan. 2020), p. 109-113CampylobacterFrangos de corteDiagnostico molecularPrevalênciaAbatedouroBrasilCampylobacterSlaughterhousePoultryqPCRDetection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plantsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001112371.pdf.txt001112371.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain23519http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/206333/2/001112371.pdf.txt3c2cde715ca2d5683705a3505472da14MD52ORIGINAL001112371.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf831378http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/206333/1/001112371.pdf364f2ec88d2371041776af1451de047bMD5110183/2063332021-08-18 04:33:08.470557oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/206333Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-08-18T07:33:08Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
title |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
spellingShingle |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants Borges, Karen Apellanis Campylobacter Frangos de corte Diagnostico molecular Prevalência Abatedouro Brasil Campylobacter Slaughterhouse Poultry qPCR |
title_short |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
title_full |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
title_fullStr |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
title_full_unstemmed |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
title_sort |
Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants |
author |
Borges, Karen Apellanis |
author_facet |
Borges, Karen Apellanis Cisco, Isabel Cristina Furian, Thales Quedi Tedesco, Denise Cristina Rodrigues, Laura Beatriz Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do Santos, Luciana Ruschel dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cisco, Isabel Cristina Furian, Thales Quedi Tedesco, Denise Cristina Rodrigues, Laura Beatriz Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do Santos, Luciana Ruschel dos |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Borges, Karen Apellanis Cisco, Isabel Cristina Furian, Thales Quedi Tedesco, Denise Cristina Rodrigues, Laura Beatriz Nascimento, Vladimir Pinheiro do Santos, Luciana Ruschel dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Campylobacter Frangos de corte Diagnostico molecular Prevalência Abatedouro Brasil |
topic |
Campylobacter Frangos de corte Diagnostico molecular Prevalência Abatedouro Brasil Campylobacter Slaughterhouse Poultry qPCR |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Campylobacter Slaughterhouse Poultry qPCR |
description |
Introduction: Campylobacteriosis is considered the most common bacteria-caused human gastroenteritis in the world. Poultry is a major reservoir of Campylobacter. Human infection may occur by consumption of raw and undercooked poultry or by contamination of other foods by these items. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in poultry processing plants with conventional culture method and real-time PCR. Methodology: A total of 108 poultry processing plant samples were collected to test with conventional microbiology and qPCR. Sampling included cloacal swabs, swabs of transport crates (before and after the cleaning and disinfection process) and carcasses (after the chiller, cooled at 4°C and frozen at −12°C). Results: Positivity in cloacal swabs indicated that poultry arrived contaminated at the slaughterhouse. Contamination in transport cages was substantially increased after the cleaning process, indicating that the process was ineffective. The detection of Campylobacter on carcasses was higher than that on cloacal swabs, which could indicate cross-contamination during the slaughtering process. Conventional microbiology and molecular methods revealed a prevalence of 69.4% and 43.5%, respectively. Lower detection by qPCR can be attributed to the high specificity of the kit and to biological components that could inhibit PCR reactions. Conclusions: Our results indicate that poultry arrive contaminated at the slaughterhouse and that contamination can increase during the slaughtering process due to cross-contamination. The isolation of Campylobacter in cooled and frozen carcasses corroborates the bacterial survival even at temperatures considered limiting to bacterial growth which are routinely used for food preservation. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-02-28T04:07:06Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/206333 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1972-2680 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001112371 |
identifier_str_mv |
1972-2680 001112371 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/206333 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Infection in Developing Countries. [Sassari, Italy]. Vol. 14, no. 1 (Jan. 2020), p. 109-113 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/206333/2/001112371.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/206333/1/001112371.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
3c2cde715ca2d5683705a3505472da14 364f2ec88d2371041776af1451de047b |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447708881649664 |