Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302 |
Resumo: | Objectives: Polymyxin resistance has been increasing in many regions, and appropriate determination ofpolymyxin susceptibility is now a major challenge worldwide. Many clinical laboratories rely on gradientdiffusion methods to assess polymyxin susceptibility, although broth microdilution (BMD) is the onlymethod currently recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST. The aim of this study was to assess theperformance of the polymyxin B (PMB) Etest in a setting with a high prevalence of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP).Methods: A commercial Etest susceptibility testing method was evaluated and compared with thereference BMD method, considering isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 2 mg/L forPMB as susceptible to this drug. A total of 310 clinical KPC-KP isolates were evaluated.Results: Susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest compared with BMD (82.6% vs. 75.8%). The MIC50,MIC90and modal MICs for PMB were 0.25, 32 and 0.25 mg/L (27.1%) by BMD and 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L(49.7%) by Etest, respectively. Although categorical agreement was 90.0%, there was poor essentialagreement (50.6%). A high rate (34.7%) of very major errors (VMEs) and a relatively low rate (2.1%) ofmajor errors were found.Conclusion: The considerable number of resistant isolates in this study allowed an accurate estimation ofVME rates and, consequently, a more comprehensive assessment of susceptibility testing for polymyxins.Etest did not meet fully the acceptance criteria for US FDA requirements. These data do not support theuse of this commercial method for determining PMB MICs in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales populations. |
id |
UFRGS-2_e0aaf3197082ff2a9d84ee2ef41886b1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/229302 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Zavascki, Alexandre PrehnMagagnin, Cibele MassottiWink, Priscila LambOliveira, Vanessa Pimentel deNunes, Aline Gabrielle AlvesKremer, Thaysa GuglieriAquino, Valério RodriguesBarth, Afonso Luis2021-09-01T04:23:52Z20202213-7165http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302001130296Objectives: Polymyxin resistance has been increasing in many regions, and appropriate determination ofpolymyxin susceptibility is now a major challenge worldwide. Many clinical laboratories rely on gradientdiffusion methods to assess polymyxin susceptibility, although broth microdilution (BMD) is the onlymethod currently recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST. The aim of this study was to assess theperformance of the polymyxin B (PMB) Etest in a setting with a high prevalence of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP).Methods: A commercial Etest susceptibility testing method was evaluated and compared with thereference BMD method, considering isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 2 mg/L forPMB as susceptible to this drug. A total of 310 clinical KPC-KP isolates were evaluated.Results: Susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest compared with BMD (82.6% vs. 75.8%). The MIC50,MIC90and modal MICs for PMB were 0.25, 32 and 0.25 mg/L (27.1%) by BMD and 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L(49.7%) by Etest, respectively. Although categorical agreement was 90.0%, there was poor essentialagreement (50.6%). A high rate (34.7%) of very major errors (VMEs) and a relatively low rate (2.1%) ofmajor errors were found.Conclusion: The considerable number of resistant isolates in this study allowed an accurate estimation ofVME rates and, consequently, a more comprehensive assessment of susceptibility testing for polymyxins.Etest did not meet fully the acceptance criteria for US FDA requirements. These data do not support theuse of this commercial method for determining PMB MICs in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales populations.application/pdfengJournal of global antimicrobial resistance. Amsterdam. Vol. 22 (2020), p. 40-42.Polimixina BColistinaInfecções por KlebsiellaEnterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicosKlebsiella pneumoniaePrevalênciaResistência microbiana a medicamentosBroth microdilutionCarbapenem resistanceColistinGradient testKlebsiella pneumoniaePolymyxin BPerformance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniaeEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001130296.pdf.txt001130296.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19156http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/2/001130296.pdf.txt086653632878378c922a45424009e600MD52ORIGINAL001130296.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf340789http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/1/001130296.pdfd43885c8e1580847ced83c587b21bd96MD5110183/2293022021-09-19 04:25:57.501558oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/229302Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-09-19T07:25:57Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
title |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
spellingShingle |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn Polimixina B Colistina Infecções por Klebsiella Enterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicos Klebsiella pneumoniae Prevalência Resistência microbiana a medicamentos Broth microdilution Carbapenem resistance Colistin Gradient test Klebsiella pneumoniae Polymyxin B |
title_short |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
title_full |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
title_fullStr |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
title_sort |
Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae |
author |
Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn |
author_facet |
Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn Magagnin, Cibele Massotti Wink, Priscila Lamb Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri Aquino, Valério Rodrigues Barth, Afonso Luis |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Magagnin, Cibele Massotti Wink, Priscila Lamb Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri Aquino, Valério Rodrigues Barth, Afonso Luis |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn Magagnin, Cibele Massotti Wink, Priscila Lamb Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri Aquino, Valério Rodrigues Barth, Afonso Luis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Polimixina B Colistina Infecções por Klebsiella Enterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicos Klebsiella pneumoniae Prevalência Resistência microbiana a medicamentos |
topic |
Polimixina B Colistina Infecções por Klebsiella Enterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicos Klebsiella pneumoniae Prevalência Resistência microbiana a medicamentos Broth microdilution Carbapenem resistance Colistin Gradient test Klebsiella pneumoniae Polymyxin B |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Broth microdilution Carbapenem resistance Colistin Gradient test Klebsiella pneumoniae Polymyxin B |
description |
Objectives: Polymyxin resistance has been increasing in many regions, and appropriate determination ofpolymyxin susceptibility is now a major challenge worldwide. Many clinical laboratories rely on gradientdiffusion methods to assess polymyxin susceptibility, although broth microdilution (BMD) is the onlymethod currently recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST. The aim of this study was to assess theperformance of the polymyxin B (PMB) Etest in a setting with a high prevalence of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP).Methods: A commercial Etest susceptibility testing method was evaluated and compared with thereference BMD method, considering isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 2 mg/L forPMB as susceptible to this drug. A total of 310 clinical KPC-KP isolates were evaluated.Results: Susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest compared with BMD (82.6% vs. 75.8%). The MIC50,MIC90and modal MICs for PMB were 0.25, 32 and 0.25 mg/L (27.1%) by BMD and 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L(49.7%) by Etest, respectively. Although categorical agreement was 90.0%, there was poor essentialagreement (50.6%). A high rate (34.7%) of very major errors (VMEs) and a relatively low rate (2.1%) ofmajor errors were found.Conclusion: The considerable number of resistant isolates in this study allowed an accurate estimation ofVME rates and, consequently, a more comprehensive assessment of susceptibility testing for polymyxins.Etest did not meet fully the acceptance criteria for US FDA requirements. These data do not support theuse of this commercial method for determining PMB MICs in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales populations. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-01T04:23:52Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2213-7165 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001130296 |
identifier_str_mv |
2213-7165 001130296 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of global antimicrobial resistance. Amsterdam. Vol. 22 (2020), p. 40-42. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/2/001130296.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/1/001130296.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
086653632878378c922a45424009e600 d43885c8e1580847ced83c587b21bd96 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447765326495744 |