Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Magagnin, Cibele Massotti, Wink, Priscila Lamb, Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de, Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves, Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri, Aquino, Valério Rodrigues, Barth, Afonso Luis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302
Resumo: Objectives: Polymyxin resistance has been increasing in many regions, and appropriate determination ofpolymyxin susceptibility is now a major challenge worldwide. Many clinical laboratories rely on gradientdiffusion methods to assess polymyxin susceptibility, although broth microdilution (BMD) is the onlymethod currently recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST. The aim of this study was to assess theperformance of the polymyxin B (PMB) Etest in a setting with a high prevalence of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP).Methods: A commercial Etest susceptibility testing method was evaluated and compared with thereference BMD method, considering isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 2 mg/L forPMB as susceptible to this drug. A total of 310 clinical KPC-KP isolates were evaluated.Results: Susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest compared with BMD (82.6% vs. 75.8%). The MIC50,MIC90and modal MICs for PMB were 0.25, 32 and 0.25 mg/L (27.1%) by BMD and 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L(49.7%) by Etest, respectively. Although categorical agreement was 90.0%, there was poor essentialagreement (50.6%). A high rate (34.7%) of very major errors (VMEs) and a relatively low rate (2.1%) ofmajor errors were found.Conclusion: The considerable number of resistant isolates in this study allowed an accurate estimation ofVME rates and, consequently, a more comprehensive assessment of susceptibility testing for polymyxins.Etest did not meet fully the acceptance criteria for US FDA requirements. These data do not support theuse of this commercial method for determining PMB MICs in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales populations.
id UFRGS-2_e0aaf3197082ff2a9d84ee2ef41886b1
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/229302
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Zavascki, Alexandre PrehnMagagnin, Cibele MassottiWink, Priscila LambOliveira, Vanessa Pimentel deNunes, Aline Gabrielle AlvesKremer, Thaysa GuglieriAquino, Valério RodriguesBarth, Afonso Luis2021-09-01T04:23:52Z20202213-7165http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302001130296Objectives: Polymyxin resistance has been increasing in many regions, and appropriate determination ofpolymyxin susceptibility is now a major challenge worldwide. Many clinical laboratories rely on gradientdiffusion methods to assess polymyxin susceptibility, although broth microdilution (BMD) is the onlymethod currently recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST. The aim of this study was to assess theperformance of the polymyxin B (PMB) Etest in a setting with a high prevalence of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP).Methods: A commercial Etest susceptibility testing method was evaluated and compared with thereference BMD method, considering isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 2 mg/L forPMB as susceptible to this drug. A total of 310 clinical KPC-KP isolates were evaluated.Results: Susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest compared with BMD (82.6% vs. 75.8%). The MIC50,MIC90and modal MICs for PMB were 0.25, 32 and 0.25 mg/L (27.1%) by BMD and 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L(49.7%) by Etest, respectively. Although categorical agreement was 90.0%, there was poor essentialagreement (50.6%). A high rate (34.7%) of very major errors (VMEs) and a relatively low rate (2.1%) ofmajor errors were found.Conclusion: The considerable number of resistant isolates in this study allowed an accurate estimation ofVME rates and, consequently, a more comprehensive assessment of susceptibility testing for polymyxins.Etest did not meet fully the acceptance criteria for US FDA requirements. These data do not support theuse of this commercial method for determining PMB MICs in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales populations.application/pdfengJournal of global antimicrobial resistance. Amsterdam. Vol. 22 (2020), p. 40-42.Polimixina BColistinaInfecções por KlebsiellaEnterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicosKlebsiella pneumoniaePrevalênciaResistência microbiana a medicamentosBroth microdilutionCarbapenem resistanceColistinGradient testKlebsiella pneumoniaePolymyxin BPerformance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniaeEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001130296.pdf.txt001130296.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19156http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/2/001130296.pdf.txt086653632878378c922a45424009e600MD52ORIGINAL001130296.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf340789http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/1/001130296.pdfd43885c8e1580847ced83c587b21bd96MD5110183/2293022021-09-19 04:25:57.501558oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/229302Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-09-19T07:25:57Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
title Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
spellingShingle Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn
Polimixina B
Colistina
Infecções por Klebsiella
Enterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicos
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Prevalência
Resistência microbiana a medicamentos
Broth microdilution
Carbapenem resistance
Colistin
Gradient test
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Polymyxin B
title_short Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
title_full Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
title_fullStr Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
title_full_unstemmed Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
title_sort Performance of polymyxin B Etest in a setting of high prevalence of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae
author Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn
author_facet Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn
Magagnin, Cibele Massotti
Wink, Priscila Lamb
Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de
Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves
Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri
Aquino, Valério Rodrigues
Barth, Afonso Luis
author_role author
author2 Magagnin, Cibele Massotti
Wink, Priscila Lamb
Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de
Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves
Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri
Aquino, Valério Rodrigues
Barth, Afonso Luis
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zavascki, Alexandre Prehn
Magagnin, Cibele Massotti
Wink, Priscila Lamb
Oliveira, Vanessa Pimentel de
Nunes, Aline Gabrielle Alves
Kremer, Thaysa Guglieri
Aquino, Valério Rodrigues
Barth, Afonso Luis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Polimixina B
Colistina
Infecções por Klebsiella
Enterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicos
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Prevalência
Resistência microbiana a medicamentos
topic Polimixina B
Colistina
Infecções por Klebsiella
Enterobacteriáceas resistentes a carbapenêmicos
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Prevalência
Resistência microbiana a medicamentos
Broth microdilution
Carbapenem resistance
Colistin
Gradient test
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Polymyxin B
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Broth microdilution
Carbapenem resistance
Colistin
Gradient test
Klebsiella pneumoniae
Polymyxin B
description Objectives: Polymyxin resistance has been increasing in many regions, and appropriate determination ofpolymyxin susceptibility is now a major challenge worldwide. Many clinical laboratories rely on gradientdiffusion methods to assess polymyxin susceptibility, although broth microdilution (BMD) is the onlymethod currently recommended by the CLSI and EUCAST. The aim of this study was to assess theperformance of the polymyxin B (PMB) Etest in a setting with a high prevalence of KPC-producingKlebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-KP).Methods: A commercial Etest susceptibility testing method was evaluated and compared with thereference BMD method, considering isolates with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) 2 mg/L forPMB as susceptible to this drug. A total of 310 clinical KPC-KP isolates were evaluated.Results: Susceptibility was significantly higher by Etest compared with BMD (82.6% vs. 75.8%). The MIC50,MIC90and modal MICs for PMB were 0.25, 32 and 0.25 mg/L (27.1%) by BMD and 0.5, 16 and 0.5 mg/L(49.7%) by Etest, respectively. Although categorical agreement was 90.0%, there was poor essentialagreement (50.6%). A high rate (34.7%) of very major errors (VMEs) and a relatively low rate (2.1%) ofmajor errors were found.Conclusion: The considerable number of resistant isolates in this study allowed an accurate estimation ofVME rates and, consequently, a more comprehensive assessment of susceptibility testing for polymyxins.Etest did not meet fully the acceptance criteria for US FDA requirements. These data do not support theuse of this commercial method for determining PMB MICs in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales populations.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01T04:23:52Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2213-7165
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001130296
identifier_str_mv 2213-7165
001130296
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/229302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of global antimicrobial resistance. Amsterdam. Vol. 22 (2020), p. 40-42.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/2/001130296.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/229302/1/001130296.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 086653632878378c922a45424009e600
d43885c8e1580847ced83c587b21bd96
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447765326495744