Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/20395 |
Resumo: | In this work, an indirect ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for an outer membrane protein of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis was used for detection of Salmonella in 154 samples of chicken meat. Its efficiency was determined through comparison with the results obtained from the conventional method. The prevalence of samples contaminated with Salmonella was 23% with the conventional culture method, and 26% with the ELISA. From thirty-five samples positive for Salmonella by the conventional method, 33 were also positive by ELISA. Seven other samples were only positive in the ELISA. Comparison of the results obtained in the two methods showed an ELISA sensitivity and specificity of 94%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82% and 98% respectively. The serotyping of the isolates revealed 31 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, 2 Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg, 1 Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis and 1 Salmonella enterica sorovar 6,7 |
id |
UFRGS-2_f08473e3685fb11de0ecb9b07d469d7d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/20395 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Schneid, Andréa dos SantosRodrigues, Kelly LameiroChemello, DaviTondo, Eduardo CesarAyub, Marco Antônio ZáchiaAleixo, José Antônio Guimarães2010-04-16T09:14:44Z20061517-8382http://hdl.handle.net/10183/20395000601373In this work, an indirect ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for an outer membrane protein of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis was used for detection of Salmonella in 154 samples of chicken meat. Its efficiency was determined through comparison with the results obtained from the conventional method. The prevalence of samples contaminated with Salmonella was 23% with the conventional culture method, and 26% with the ELISA. From thirty-five samples positive for Salmonella by the conventional method, 33 were also positive by ELISA. Seven other samples were only positive in the ELISA. Comparison of the results obtained in the two methods showed an ELISA sensitivity and specificity of 94%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82% and 98% respectively. The serotyping of the isolates revealed 31 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, 2 Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg, 1 Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis and 1 Salmonella enterica sorovar 6,7application/pdfengBrazilian journal of microbiology. São Paulo. vol. 37, n. 3 (jul/set. 2006), p. 350-355SalmonellaCarne de frangoAnticorpo monoclonalELISASalmonellaMonoclonal antibodyPoliclonal antibodyELISAEvaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meatinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000601373.pdf000601373.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf145396http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/20395/1/000601373.pdf5c7ed5a370a562bb5ed926d6ca6c3003MD51TEXT000601373.pdf.txt000601373.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain26565http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/20395/2/000601373.pdf.txtf93afaf6c1d3630108ce3570ed4dfe90MD52THUMBNAIL000601373.pdf.jpg000601373.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1750http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/20395/3/000601373.pdf.jpg9f2335f6efe3f737851b966a594f918cMD5310183/203952018-10-08 08:34:13.121oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/20395Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-08T11:34:13Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
title |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat Schneid, Andréa dos Santos Salmonella Carne de frango Anticorpo monoclonal ELISA Salmonella Monoclonal antibody Policlonal antibody ELISA |
title_short |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
title_full |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
title_sort |
Evaluation of an indirect Elisa for the detection of Salmonella in chicken meat |
author |
Schneid, Andréa dos Santos |
author_facet |
Schneid, Andréa dos Santos Rodrigues, Kelly Lameiro Chemello, Davi Tondo, Eduardo Cesar Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia Aleixo, José Antônio Guimarães |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rodrigues, Kelly Lameiro Chemello, Davi Tondo, Eduardo Cesar Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia Aleixo, José Antônio Guimarães |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Schneid, Andréa dos Santos Rodrigues, Kelly Lameiro Chemello, Davi Tondo, Eduardo Cesar Ayub, Marco Antônio Záchia Aleixo, José Antônio Guimarães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Salmonella Carne de frango Anticorpo monoclonal ELISA |
topic |
Salmonella Carne de frango Anticorpo monoclonal ELISA Salmonella Monoclonal antibody Policlonal antibody ELISA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Salmonella Monoclonal antibody Policlonal antibody ELISA |
description |
In this work, an indirect ELISA based on a monoclonal antibody (MAb) specific for an outer membrane protein of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis was used for detection of Salmonella in 154 samples of chicken meat. Its efficiency was determined through comparison with the results obtained from the conventional method. The prevalence of samples contaminated with Salmonella was 23% with the conventional culture method, and 26% with the ELISA. From thirty-five samples positive for Salmonella by the conventional method, 33 were also positive by ELISA. Seven other samples were only positive in the ELISA. Comparison of the results obtained in the two methods showed an ELISA sensitivity and specificity of 94%, and positive and negative predictive values of 82% and 98% respectively. The serotyping of the isolates revealed 31 Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis, 2 Salmonella enterica serovar Heidelberg, 1 Salmonella enterica serovar Choleraesuis and 1 Salmonella enterica sorovar 6,7 |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2006 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2010-04-16T09:14:44Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/20395 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1517-8382 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000601373 |
identifier_str_mv |
1517-8382 000601373 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/20395 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian journal of microbiology. São Paulo. vol. 37, n. 3 (jul/set. 2006), p. 350-355 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/20395/1/000601373.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/20395/2/000601373.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/20395/3/000601373.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
5c7ed5a370a562bb5ed926d6ca6c3003 f93afaf6c1d3630108ce3570ed4dfe90 9f2335f6efe3f737851b966a594f918c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224706542534656 |