The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Quiroga, Tiago
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Policena, Guilherme
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Intexto (Porto Alegre)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/102545
Resumo: Tensioned by the outbreak of Covid-19 ― a phenomenon that intensifies not only the relationship with the Other in telematic networks, but the challenge of interpreting it from its several implications ―, this paper outlines the concept of intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser’s thought. Flusser thinks that, in the transition to a technically structured culture, it is necessary to recognize the other when confronting telematic networks, despite it having fallen to a minor anthropological region, in which it remains even more out of sight. Unlike a certain Greek or Enlightenment tradition, Flusser suggests that such protocols do not only produce an interobjectivity, but an intersubjectivity in which the other, even when it is entangled with technical interactions, responds to an ethical and existential meaning. The article is divided into two major parts: first, we explain the theoretical foundations for Flusser’s approach to intersubjectivity along his trajectory from philosophy to a general theory of communication (or communicology), by which he seeks to combine an understanding of encoding and decoding processes (information) with an understanding of meaning-making. We then approach intersubjectivity across different ontological levels: intersubjectivity in thought, in relation, in knowledge and, finally, in telematic networks. We conclude that Flusser's theoretical fortune on intersubjectivity contributes to an ethical response to the problem of alterity in the context of 21st century networks, as well as to the development of a communication science, addressed to a dynamic temporality, intertwined with technology.
id UFRGS-6_329d904ad35e5628d3f266ea4f0af0aa
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/102545
network_acronym_str UFRGS-6
network_name_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository_id_str
spelling The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém FlusserO Outro da comunicação: intersubjetividade em Vilém FlusserAlteridade. Comunicação. Comunicologia. Flusser. Intersubjetividade.Alterity. Communication. Communicology. Flusser. Intersubjectivity.Tensioned by the outbreak of Covid-19 ― a phenomenon that intensifies not only the relationship with the Other in telematic networks, but the challenge of interpreting it from its several implications ―, this paper outlines the concept of intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser’s thought. Flusser thinks that, in the transition to a technically structured culture, it is necessary to recognize the other when confronting telematic networks, despite it having fallen to a minor anthropological region, in which it remains even more out of sight. Unlike a certain Greek or Enlightenment tradition, Flusser suggests that such protocols do not only produce an interobjectivity, but an intersubjectivity in which the other, even when it is entangled with technical interactions, responds to an ethical and existential meaning. The article is divided into two major parts: first, we explain the theoretical foundations for Flusser’s approach to intersubjectivity along his trajectory from philosophy to a general theory of communication (or communicology), by which he seeks to combine an understanding of encoding and decoding processes (information) with an understanding of meaning-making. We then approach intersubjectivity across different ontological levels: intersubjectivity in thought, in relation, in knowledge and, finally, in telematic networks. We conclude that Flusser's theoretical fortune on intersubjectivity contributes to an ethical response to the problem of alterity in the context of 21st century networks, as well as to the development of a communication science, addressed to a dynamic temporality, intertwined with technology.Tensionado pela irrupção da Covid-19 – fenômeno que intensifica não apenas a relação com o Outro nas redes telemáticas, mas o próprio desafio de interpretá-la desde suas variadas implicações –, o texto apresenta a ideia de intersubjetividade no pensamento de Vilém Flusser. Para o filósofo tcheco-brasileiro, na transição de uma cultura tecnicamente estruturada, em que pese ter decaído para uma região antropológica reduzida, na qual se mantém ainda mais oculto, é necessário reconhecer o outro no enfrentamento das redes telemáticas. Diferente de certa tradição grega ou iluminista, Flusser sugere que tais protocolos não produzem apenas uma interobjetividade, mas uma intersubjetividade em que o outro, mesmo resultando das interações técnicas, responde a uma significação ética e existencial. Em termos metodológicos, o artigo se divide em dois grandes gestos: (1) exposição dos fundamentos teóricos da intersubjetividade que constituem a trajetória de Flusser da filosofia a uma teoria geral da comunicação (ou comunicologia) – esta última buscando conciliar os processos de codificação e decodificação (informação) justapostos à produção de sentido; (2) apresentação da intersubjetividade em diferentes níveis ontológicos: no pensamento, na relação, no conhecimento e, por fim, nas redes telemáticas. Conclui-se que a fortuna teórica de Flusser sobre a intersubjetividade contribui para uma resposta ética à problemática da alteridade no contexto das redes do século XXI, assim como para o desenvolvimento de uma ciência da comunicação, endereçada a uma temporalidade dinâmica, entrelaçada com a tecnologia.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2020-12-21info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/10254510.19132/1807-8583202051.146-165Intexto; No. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165Intexto; Núm. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165Intexto; No. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165Intexto; N. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165Intexto; n. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-1651807-8583reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/102545/59465Copyright (c) 2020 Tiago Quiroga, Guilherme Policenahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuiroga, TiagoPolicena, Guilherme2023-02-09T12:22:09Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/102545Revistahttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intextoONGhttp://seer.ufrgs.br/intexto/oai||intexto@ufrgs.br1807-85831807-8583opendoar:2023-02-09T12:22:09Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
O Outro da comunicação: intersubjetividade em Vilém Flusser
title The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
spellingShingle The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
Quiroga, Tiago
Alteridade. Comunicação. Comunicologia. Flusser. Intersubjetividade.
Alterity. Communication. Communicology. Flusser. Intersubjectivity.
title_short The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
title_full The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
title_fullStr The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
title_full_unstemmed The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
title_sort The Other of communication: intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser
author Quiroga, Tiago
author_facet Quiroga, Tiago
Policena, Guilherme
author_role author
author2 Policena, Guilherme
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quiroga, Tiago
Policena, Guilherme
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Alteridade. Comunicação. Comunicologia. Flusser. Intersubjetividade.
Alterity. Communication. Communicology. Flusser. Intersubjectivity.
topic Alteridade. Comunicação. Comunicologia. Flusser. Intersubjetividade.
Alterity. Communication. Communicology. Flusser. Intersubjectivity.
description Tensioned by the outbreak of Covid-19 ― a phenomenon that intensifies not only the relationship with the Other in telematic networks, but the challenge of interpreting it from its several implications ―, this paper outlines the concept of intersubjectivity in Vilém Flusser’s thought. Flusser thinks that, in the transition to a technically structured culture, it is necessary to recognize the other when confronting telematic networks, despite it having fallen to a minor anthropological region, in which it remains even more out of sight. Unlike a certain Greek or Enlightenment tradition, Flusser suggests that such protocols do not only produce an interobjectivity, but an intersubjectivity in which the other, even when it is entangled with technical interactions, responds to an ethical and existential meaning. The article is divided into two major parts: first, we explain the theoretical foundations for Flusser’s approach to intersubjectivity along his trajectory from philosophy to a general theory of communication (or communicology), by which he seeks to combine an understanding of encoding and decoding processes (information) with an understanding of meaning-making. We then approach intersubjectivity across different ontological levels: intersubjectivity in thought, in relation, in knowledge and, finally, in telematic networks. We conclude that Flusser's theoretical fortune on intersubjectivity contributes to an ethical response to the problem of alterity in the context of 21st century networks, as well as to the development of a communication science, addressed to a dynamic temporality, intertwined with technology.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-21
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/102545
10.19132/1807-8583202051.146-165
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/102545
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1807-8583202051.146-165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/intexto/article/view/102545/59465
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Tiago Quiroga, Guilherme Policena
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Tiago Quiroga, Guilherme Policena
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Intexto; No. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165
Intexto; Núm. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165
Intexto; No. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165
Intexto; N. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165
Intexto; n. 51 (2020): Edição Especial Dossiê Flusser: 100 anos; 146-165
1807-8583
reponame:Intexto (Porto Alegre)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Intexto (Porto Alegre)
collection Intexto (Porto Alegre)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Intexto (Porto Alegre) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||intexto@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766110940168192