The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: de Oliveira Costa, Alex
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Roncaglio, Cynthia
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/90306
Resumo: The principle of provenance and the concepts of record and organicity that guide Archival Science since the nineteenth century seem, at least partially, no longer sufficient to explain and guide the production of contemporary records. This article aims to analyze the arguments and assumptions of the classical, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science, which demonstrate the particularities and contributions of each one. The research is characterized as qualitative, exploratory, analytical and descriptive, in which the method adopted is the bibliographic survey. The theoretical framework was based on the history of the concepts of author Reinhart Koselleck and on the concepts of scientific ethos and discourse. It was observed in the clash between different ideas and different approaches, considered sometimes antagonistic, that a dialogue between them is possible through processes of re-signification of the principles and concepts throughout the own evolutionary dynamics of science.
id UFRGS-8_b24ad8cb1fb7e94b64f014f51006585a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/90306
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival ScienceO diálogo entre as vertentes clássica, moderna e contemporânea da ArquivologiaArquivoArquivologiaDocumento arquivísticoProveniênciaArchival ScienceRecordPrinciple of ProvenanceOrganicity.The principle of provenance and the concepts of record and organicity that guide Archival Science since the nineteenth century seem, at least partially, no longer sufficient to explain and guide the production of contemporary records. This article aims to analyze the arguments and assumptions of the classical, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science, which demonstrate the particularities and contributions of each one. The research is characterized as qualitative, exploratory, analytical and descriptive, in which the method adopted is the bibliographic survey. The theoretical framework was based on the history of the concepts of author Reinhart Koselleck and on the concepts of scientific ethos and discourse. It was observed in the clash between different ideas and different approaches, considered sometimes antagonistic, that a dialogue between them is possible through processes of re-signification of the principles and concepts throughout the own evolutionary dynamics of science.O princípio da proveniência e os conceitos de documento de arquivo e organicidade que norteiam a Arquivologia desde o século XIX parecem, pelo menos parcialmente, não serem mais suficientes para explicar e orientar a produção dos documentos arquivísticos contemporâneos. Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar os argumentos e pressupostos das vertentes clássica, moderna e contemporânea da Arquivologia, que demonstram as particularidades e as contribuições de cada uma. A pesquisa caracteriza-se como qualitativa, de natureza exploratória, analítica e descritiva, na qual o método adotado é o levantamento bibliográfico. O referencial teórico baseou-se na história dos conceitos de Reinhart Koselleck e nos conceitos de ethos científico e discurso.  Constatou-se no embate entre diferentes ideias e distintas abordagens, consideradas às vezes antagônicas, que é possível um diálogo entre elas mediante processos de ressignificação dos princípios e conceitos ao longo da própria dinâmica evolutiva da ciência.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2020-04-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/9030610.19132/1808-5245262.355-386Em Questão; v. 26, n. 2, maio/ago. 2020; 355-386Em Questão; v. 26, n. 2, maio/ago. 2020; 355-386Em Questão; v. 26, n. 2, maio/ago. 2020; 355-3861808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/90306/56250Copyright (c) 2020 Alex de Oliveira Costa, Cynthia Roncagliohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Oliveira Costa, AlexRoncaglio, Cynthia2024-03-26T13:44:31Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/90306Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2024-03-26T13:44:31Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
O diálogo entre as vertentes clássica, moderna e contemporânea da Arquivologia
title The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
spellingShingle The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
de Oliveira Costa, Alex
Arquivo
Arquivologia
Documento arquivístico
Proveniência
Archival Science
Record
Principle of Provenance
Organicity.
title_short The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
title_full The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
title_fullStr The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
title_full_unstemmed The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
title_sort The dialogue between the classic, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science
author de Oliveira Costa, Alex
author_facet de Oliveira Costa, Alex
Roncaglio, Cynthia
author_role author
author2 Roncaglio, Cynthia
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Oliveira Costa, Alex
Roncaglio, Cynthia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Arquivo
Arquivologia
Documento arquivístico
Proveniência
Archival Science
Record
Principle of Provenance
Organicity.
topic Arquivo
Arquivologia
Documento arquivístico
Proveniência
Archival Science
Record
Principle of Provenance
Organicity.
description The principle of provenance and the concepts of record and organicity that guide Archival Science since the nineteenth century seem, at least partially, no longer sufficient to explain and guide the production of contemporary records. This article aims to analyze the arguments and assumptions of the classical, modern and contemporary aspects of Archival Science, which demonstrate the particularities and contributions of each one. The research is characterized as qualitative, exploratory, analytical and descriptive, in which the method adopted is the bibliographic survey. The theoretical framework was based on the history of the concepts of author Reinhart Koselleck and on the concepts of scientific ethos and discourse. It was observed in the clash between different ideas and different approaches, considered sometimes antagonistic, that a dialogue between them is possible through processes of re-signification of the principles and concepts throughout the own evolutionary dynamics of science.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/90306
10.19132/1808-5245262.355-386
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/90306
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1808-5245262.355-386
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/90306/56250
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Alex de Oliveira Costa, Cynthia Roncaglio
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Alex de Oliveira Costa, Cynthia Roncaglio
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; v. 26, n. 2, maio/ago. 2020; 355-386
Em Questão; v. 26, n. 2, maio/ago. 2020; 355-386
Em Questão; v. 26, n. 2, maio/ago. 2020; 355-386
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766161488871424

Registros relacionados