Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Em Questão (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122916 |
Resumo: | This study proposes to present theoretical and conceptual reflections about the contributions of the dialogic and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review. The dimensions adopted in this research are part of the mediation process developed by Gomes, and its use is justified by the fact that the dimensions presented can be materialized from different perspectives in informational environments, including in the spaces of dissemination of the production of the knowledge, such as scientific journals, and, consequently, in the scope of open review, an evaluation modality that aims, from different characteristics, to provide more transparency, ethics and collaboration for the flow of manuscript appreciation, and to consolidate itself as one of the facets addressed by open science. Of an exploratory nature, with a qualitative approach and based on bibliographic research, theoretical and conceptual approximations were found between the mediation of information and its dimensions with open peer review. It is believed that such reflections provided from the understanding of the dimensions, especially the dialogic and ethical ones, can contribute to expand the understanding about the mediation of information in the editorial environment, its approximations with open science, and in particular, with open review. |
id |
UFRGS-8_efb72339451440aa352067c5a1b15b5f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/122916 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-8 |
network_name_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review Contribuição das dimensões dialógica e ética da mediação da informação para a revisão por pares abertainformation mediationdimensions of information mediationdialogical dimensionethical dimensionopen peer reviewmediação da informaçãodimensões da mediação da informaçãodimensão dialógicadimensão éticarevisão por pares abertaThis study proposes to present theoretical and conceptual reflections about the contributions of the dialogic and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review. The dimensions adopted in this research are part of the mediation process developed by Gomes, and its use is justified by the fact that the dimensions presented can be materialized from different perspectives in informational environments, including in the spaces of dissemination of the production of the knowledge, such as scientific journals, and, consequently, in the scope of open review, an evaluation modality that aims, from different characteristics, to provide more transparency, ethics and collaboration for the flow of manuscript appreciation, and to consolidate itself as one of the facets addressed by open science. Of an exploratory nature, with a qualitative approach and based on bibliographic research, theoretical and conceptual approximations were found between the mediation of information and its dimensions with open peer review. It is believed that such reflections provided from the understanding of the dimensions, especially the dialogic and ethical ones, can contribute to expand the understanding about the mediation of information in the editorial environment, its approximations with open science, and in particular, with open review.Este estudo se propõe a apresentar reflexões teóricas e conceituais acerca das contribuições das dimensões dialógica e ética da mediação da informação para a revisão por pares aberta. As dimensões adotadas nesta pesquisa fazem parte do processo mediador desenvolvido por Gomes, e sua utilização tem como justificativa o fato de que as dimensões apresentadas podem se concretizar sob diferentes perspectivas em ambientes informacionais, inclusive nos espaços de disseminação da produção do conhecimento, como os periódicos científicos, e, consequentemente, no escopo da revisão aberta, modalidade de avaliação que visa, a partir de diferentes características, proporcionar mais transparência, ética e colaboração para o fluxo de apreciação dos manuscritos, e se consolidar como uma das facetas abordados pela ciência aberta. De cunho exploratório, com abordagem qualitativa e baseado em pesquisa bibliográfica, encontrou-se aproximações teóricas e conceituais entre a mediação da informação e suas dimensões com a revisão por pares aberta. Acredita-se que tais reflexões proporcionadas a partir do entendimento das dimensões, em especial da dialógica e ética poderão contribuir para ampliar a compreensão acerca da mediação da informação no ambiente editorial, suas aproximações com a ciência aberta, e em especial, com a revisão aberta.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2022-12-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/12291610.19132/1808-5245.29.122916Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122916Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122916Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 1229161808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122916/86351Copyright (c) 2022 Francisca Clotilde de Andrade Maia, Maria Giovanna Guedes Fariashttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaia, Francisca Clotilde de AndradeFarias, Maria Giovanna Guedes2023-12-07T14:06:57Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/122916Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2023-12-07T14:06:57Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review Contribuição das dimensões dialógica e ética da mediação da informação para a revisão por pares aberta |
title |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review |
spellingShingle |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review Maia, Francisca Clotilde de Andrade information mediation dimensions of information mediation dialogical dimension ethical dimension open peer review mediação da informação dimensões da mediação da informação dimensão dialógica dimensão ética revisão por pares aberta |
title_short |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review |
title_full |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review |
title_fullStr |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review |
title_sort |
Contribution of dialogical and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review |
author |
Maia, Francisca Clotilde de Andrade |
author_facet |
Maia, Francisca Clotilde de Andrade Farias, Maria Giovanna Guedes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Farias, Maria Giovanna Guedes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maia, Francisca Clotilde de Andrade Farias, Maria Giovanna Guedes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
information mediation dimensions of information mediation dialogical dimension ethical dimension open peer review mediação da informação dimensões da mediação da informação dimensão dialógica dimensão ética revisão por pares aberta |
topic |
information mediation dimensions of information mediation dialogical dimension ethical dimension open peer review mediação da informação dimensões da mediação da informação dimensão dialógica dimensão ética revisão por pares aberta |
description |
This study proposes to present theoretical and conceptual reflections about the contributions of the dialogic and ethical dimensions of information mediation to open peer review. The dimensions adopted in this research are part of the mediation process developed by Gomes, and its use is justified by the fact that the dimensions presented can be materialized from different perspectives in informational environments, including in the spaces of dissemination of the production of the knowledge, such as scientific journals, and, consequently, in the scope of open review, an evaluation modality that aims, from different characteristics, to provide more transparency, ethics and collaboration for the flow of manuscript appreciation, and to consolidate itself as one of the facets addressed by open science. Of an exploratory nature, with a qualitative approach and based on bibliographic research, theoretical and conceptual approximations were found between the mediation of information and its dimensions with open peer review. It is believed that such reflections provided from the understanding of the dimensions, especially the dialogic and ethical ones, can contribute to expand the understanding about the mediation of information in the editorial environment, its approximations with open science, and in particular, with open review. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado por Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122916 10.19132/1808-5245.29.122916 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122916 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.19132/1808-5245.29.122916 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/122916/86351 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Francisca Clotilde de Andrade Maia, Maria Giovanna Guedes Farias https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Francisca Clotilde de Andrade Maia, Maria Giovanna Guedes Farias https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122916 Em Questão; Vol. 29 (2023); 122916 Em Questão; v. 29 (2023); 122916 1808-5245 1807-8893 reponame:Em Questão (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Em Questão (Online) |
collection |
Em Questão (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1789438636718030848 |