Notes about Statistical Evidence

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Taruffo, Michele
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/3413
Resumo: Abstract: The essay deals with some of the problems concerning the use of statistics in evidentiary inferences. Limits and conditions of such a use are explained, with reference to the modern theory of evidence and proof. Resumo: Este artigo aborda alguns dos problemas concernentes ao uso da estatística em inferências probatórias. Os limites e as condições de tal uso são explicadas, com referência à teoria moderna da prova. 
id UFRJ-22_9e81eb81405e1b1e0b8c85a85b61d26b
oai_identifier_str oai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/3413
network_acronym_str UFRJ-22
network_name_str Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
repository_id_str
spelling Notes about Statistical EvidenceEvidence Law; Legal Proof; Statistics; Direito probatório; Prova legal; EstatísticaAbstract: The essay deals with some of the problems concerning the use of statistics in evidentiary inferences. Limits and conditions of such a use are explained, with reference to the modern theory of evidence and proof. Resumo: Este artigo aborda alguns dos problemas concernentes ao uso da estatística em inferências probatórias. Os limites e as condições de tal uso são explicadas, com referência à teoria moderna da prova. Programa de Posgrado en Derecho de la Universidad Federal de Rio de JaneiroTaruffo, Michele2016-11-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/341310.21875/tjc.v1i1.3413Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 1, n. 1 (2016); 161-180Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 1, n. 1 (2016); 161-180Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 1, n. 1 (2016); 161-1802526-046410.21875/tjc.v1i1reponame:Teoria Jurídica Contemporâneainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJenghttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/3413/3718/*ref*/ABEL LLUCH, Xavier. Las reglas de la sana crítica. Madrid: La Ley, 2015./*ref*/ALLEN, Mark; HALL, Robert; LAZEAR, Victoria. Reference guide on Estimation of Economic Damages. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 425-502./*ref*/APPELBAUM, Paul. Reference Guide on Mental Health Evidence. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 813-896./*ref*/CLERMONT, Kevin. Standards of Decision in Law: Psychological and Logical Bases for the Standard of Proof, Here and Abroad. Durham: N.C., 2013./*ref*/CLERMONT, Kevin. Death of Paradox: The Killer Logic Beneath the Standard of Proof. 88 Notre Dame L.Rev., v. 88, n. 3, p. 1061-1138, fev. 2013./*ref*/DOMINIONI, Oreste. La prova penale scientifica. Milano: Giuffrè, 2005./*ref*/DONDI, Angelo. Paradigmi processuali ed “expert witness testimony” nel diritto statunitense. Riv.trim.dir proc.civ.,p. 261-285, 1996./*ref*/FERRER BELTRÁN, Jordi. La valoración racional de la prueba. Madrid-Barcelona-Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons, 2007./*ref*/FROSINI, Benito Vittorio. Causality and Causal Models: A Conceptual Perspective. International Statistical Review, vol. 74, n. 3, p. 305-334, dez. 2006./*ref*/FROSINI, Benito Vittorio. Le prove statistiche nel processo civile e nel processo penale. Milano: Giuffrè, 2002./*ref*/GARBOLINO, Paolo. Probabilità e logica della prova. Milano: Giuffrè, 2014./*ref*/GIUSSANI, Andrea. Proof of causation in group litigation. In: MartÍn-Casals, M.; Papayannis, D. M. (Ed.). Uncertain Causation in Tort Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 240-249./*ref*/GOLDSTEIN, Bernard; HENIFLIN, Mary Sue. Reference Guide on Toxicology. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 633-686./*ref*/GONZÁLEZ LAGIER, Daniel. Questio facti: ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción. México: Fontamara, 2013./*ref*/GREELY, Henry; WAGNER, Anthony. Reference Guide on Neurosciences. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 747-812./*ref*/GREEN, Michael; FREEDMAN, D. Michal; GORDIS, Leon. Reference Guide on Epidemiology. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 549-632./*ref*/HAACK, Susan. Evidence Matters: Science, Proof and Truth in the Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014./*ref*/HAACK, Susan. Defending science -- within reason. Between Scientism and Cynicism, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003./*ref*/JAMES, Fleming; HAZARD, Geoffrey C; LEUBSDORF, John. Civil Procedure. 4th ed. Boston: Little Brown, 1992./*ref*/KAYE, David; FREEDMAN, David. Reference Guide on Statistics. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 211-302./*ref*/KAYE, David; SENSABAUGH, George. Reference Guide on DNA Identification Evidence. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 129-210./*ref*/LAUDAN, Larry. Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006./*ref*/LILLY, Graham. An Introduction to the Law of Evidence. 3rd ed. St. Paul: West Publishing Company, 1996./*ref*/MORGAN, Edmund. Basic Problems of Evidence. Philadelphia: American Law Institute, 1962./*ref*/NISBETT, Richard; ROSS, Lee. L'inferenza umana. Strategie e lacune del giudizio sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1989./*ref*/REDMAYNE, Mike. Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation. The Modern Law Review, vol. 62, n. 2, p. 167-195, mar. 1999./*ref*/FEDERAL JUDICIAL CENTER et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011./*ref*/ROBERTSON, Channing; MOALLI, John; BLACK, David. Reference Guide on Engineering. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 897-960./*ref*/RODRICKS, Joseph. Reference Guide on Exposure Science. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 503-548./*ref*/RUBINFELD, Daniel. Reference Guide on Multiple Regression. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 303-358./*ref*/SCHAUER, Frederick. Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003./*ref*/SHAPIRO, Barbara. Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probable Cause: Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999./*ref*/STELLA, Federico. Giustizia e modernità: La protezione dell'innocente e la tutela delle vittime. III ed. Milano: Giuffrè, 2003./*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. Proving Complex Facts: The Case Of Mass Torts. In: MartÍn-Casals, M.; Papayannis, D. M. (Ed.). Uncertain Causation in Tort Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 165-175./*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. La valutazione delle prove. In: TARUFFO, M (Ed.). La prova nel processo civile. Milano: Giuffrè, 2012./*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. Art.116. In: Taruffo-Carratta. Dei poteri del giudice: Art.112-120. Bologna: Zanichelli, 2011. p. 519./*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. La semplice verità: Il giudice e la ricostruzione dei fatti. Bari: Laterza, 2009./*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. Le prove scientifiche nella recente esperienza statunitense. Riv.trim.dir.proc.civ., 1996. p. 219./*ref*/TOULMIN, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. upd. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008./*ref*/TWINING, William. Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.Direitos autorais 2016 Michele Taruffoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-12-19T22:01:25Zoai:www.revistas.ufrj.br:article/3413Revistahttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/oaitjc.ppgd.ufrj@gmail.com || rodrigocarelli@direito.ufrj.br || maysasdeandrade@gmail.com2526-04642526-0464opendoar:2017-12-19T22:01:25Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Notes about Statistical Evidence
title Notes about Statistical Evidence
spellingShingle Notes about Statistical Evidence
Taruffo, Michele
Evidence Law; Legal Proof; Statistics; Direito probatório; Prova legal; Estatística
title_short Notes about Statistical Evidence
title_full Notes about Statistical Evidence
title_fullStr Notes about Statistical Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Notes about Statistical Evidence
title_sort Notes about Statistical Evidence
author Taruffo, Michele
author_facet Taruffo, Michele
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Taruffo, Michele
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Evidence Law; Legal Proof; Statistics; Direito probatório; Prova legal; Estatística
topic Evidence Law; Legal Proof; Statistics; Direito probatório; Prova legal; Estatística
description Abstract: The essay deals with some of the problems concerning the use of statistics in evidentiary inferences. Limits and conditions of such a use are explained, with reference to the modern theory of evidence and proof. Resumo: Este artigo aborda alguns dos problemas concernentes ao uso da estatística em inferências probatórias. Os limites e as condições de tal uso são explicadas, com referência à teoria moderna da prova. 
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-11-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/3413
10.21875/tjc.v1i1.3413
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/3413
identifier_str_mv 10.21875/tjc.v1i1.3413
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/3413/3718
/*ref*/ABEL LLUCH, Xavier. Las reglas de la sana crítica. Madrid: La Ley, 2015.
/*ref*/ALLEN, Mark; HALL, Robert; LAZEAR, Victoria. Reference guide on Estimation of Economic Damages. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 425-502.
/*ref*/APPELBAUM, Paul. Reference Guide on Mental Health Evidence. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 813-896.
/*ref*/CLERMONT, Kevin. Standards of Decision in Law: Psychological and Logical Bases for the Standard of Proof, Here and Abroad. Durham: N.C., 2013.
/*ref*/CLERMONT, Kevin. Death of Paradox: The Killer Logic Beneath the Standard of Proof. 88 Notre Dame L.Rev., v. 88, n. 3, p. 1061-1138, fev. 2013.
/*ref*/DOMINIONI, Oreste. La prova penale scientifica. Milano: Giuffrè, 2005.
/*ref*/DONDI, Angelo. Paradigmi processuali ed “expert witness testimony” nel diritto statunitense. Riv.trim.dir proc.civ.,p. 261-285, 1996.
/*ref*/FERRER BELTRÁN, Jordi. La valoración racional de la prueba. Madrid-Barcelona-Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons, 2007.
/*ref*/FROSINI, Benito Vittorio. Causality and Causal Models: A Conceptual Perspective. International Statistical Review, vol. 74, n. 3, p. 305-334, dez. 2006.
/*ref*/FROSINI, Benito Vittorio. Le prove statistiche nel processo civile e nel processo penale. Milano: Giuffrè, 2002.
/*ref*/GARBOLINO, Paolo. Probabilità e logica della prova. Milano: Giuffrè, 2014.
/*ref*/GIUSSANI, Andrea. Proof of causation in group litigation. In: MartÍn-Casals, M.; Papayannis, D. M. (Ed.). Uncertain Causation in Tort Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 240-249.
/*ref*/GOLDSTEIN, Bernard; HENIFLIN, Mary Sue. Reference Guide on Toxicology. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 633-686.
/*ref*/GONZÁLEZ LAGIER, Daniel. Questio facti: ensayos sobre prueba, causalidad y acción. México: Fontamara, 2013.
/*ref*/GREELY, Henry; WAGNER, Anthony. Reference Guide on Neurosciences. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 747-812.
/*ref*/GREEN, Michael; FREEDMAN, D. Michal; GORDIS, Leon. Reference Guide on Epidemiology. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 549-632.
/*ref*/HAACK, Susan. Evidence Matters: Science, Proof and Truth in the Law. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.
/*ref*/HAACK, Susan. Defending science -- within reason. Between Scientism and Cynicism, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2003.
/*ref*/JAMES, Fleming; HAZARD, Geoffrey C; LEUBSDORF, John. Civil Procedure. 4th ed. Boston: Little Brown, 1992.
/*ref*/KAYE, David; FREEDMAN, David. Reference Guide on Statistics. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 211-302.
/*ref*/KAYE, David; SENSABAUGH, George. Reference Guide on DNA Identification Evidence. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 129-210.
/*ref*/LAUDAN, Larry. Truth, Error, and Criminal Law: An Essay in Legal Epistemology. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
/*ref*/LILLY, Graham. An Introduction to the Law of Evidence. 3rd ed. St. Paul: West Publishing Company, 1996.
/*ref*/MORGAN, Edmund. Basic Problems of Evidence. Philadelphia: American Law Institute, 1962.
/*ref*/NISBETT, Richard; ROSS, Lee. L'inferenza umana. Strategie e lacune del giudizio sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino, 1989.
/*ref*/REDMAYNE, Mike. Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation. The Modern Law Review, vol. 62, n. 2, p. 167-195, mar. 1999.
/*ref*/FEDERAL JUDICIAL CENTER et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011.
/*ref*/ROBERTSON, Channing; MOALLI, John; BLACK, David. Reference Guide on Engineering. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 897-960.
/*ref*/RODRICKS, Joseph. Reference Guide on Exposure Science. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 503-548.
/*ref*/RUBINFELD, Daniel. Reference Guide on Multiple Regression. In: Federal Judicial Center et al. Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. 3rd ed. Washington, D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2011. p. 303-358.
/*ref*/SCHAUER, Frederick. Profiles, Probabilities and Stereotypes. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003.
/*ref*/SHAPIRO, Barbara. Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probable Cause: Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
/*ref*/STELLA, Federico. Giustizia e modernità: La protezione dell'innocente e la tutela delle vittime. III ed. Milano: Giuffrè, 2003.
/*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. Proving Complex Facts: The Case Of Mass Torts. In: MartÍn-Casals, M.; Papayannis, D. M. (Ed.). Uncertain Causation in Tort Law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2016. p. 165-175.
/*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. La valutazione delle prove. In: TARUFFO, M (Ed.). La prova nel processo civile. Milano: Giuffrè, 2012.
/*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. Art.116. In: Taruffo-Carratta. Dei poteri del giudice: Art.112-120. Bologna: Zanichelli, 2011. p. 519.
/*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. La semplice verità: Il giudice e la ricostruzione dei fatti. Bari: Laterza, 2009.
/*ref*/TARUFFO, Michele. Le prove scientifiche nella recente esperienza statunitense. Riv.trim.dir.proc.civ., 1996. p. 219.
/*ref*/TOULMIN, Stephen. The Uses of Argument. upd. ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
/*ref*/TWINING, William. Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Michele Taruffo
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Michele Taruffo
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Posgrado en Derecho de la Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Posgrado en Derecho de la Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 1, n. 1 (2016); 161-180
Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 1, n. 1 (2016); 161-180
Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 1, n. 1 (2016); 161-180
2526-0464
10.21875/tjc.v1i1
reponame:Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
collection Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
repository.name.fl_str_mv Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tjc.ppgd.ufrj@gmail.com || rodrigocarelli@direito.ufrj.br || maysasdeandrade@gmail.com
_version_ 1797042348764430336

Registros relacionados