Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Floresta e Ambiente |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300116 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT This study aims to show the organizational capacity and structure of the forest management system of the State of Amapá, Brazil. The research was based on the principles applied in Public Administration functions. We found that forest management in Amapá is performed by four State agencies consisting of two management systems that act on the production side, with one being in direct administration as the formulator of forestry policy, and one being an autonomous agency linked to the previous one as executor of forestry policy, and the other two systems being more directly linked to protection, with one being a formulator of environmental policy and the other its executor. There was a statistically significant correlation between the perceptions of public officers and the users of institutions regarding the organizational system. Some conflicts were observed between the four institutions in terms of forest administration responsibilities. We concluded that the maintenance of the existing forest coverage is not directly due to institutional capacities. |
id |
UFRJ-3_ae2a80f335479e68cea3d4d764e14b9b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2179-80872018000300116 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-3 |
network_name_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazilgovernanceorganizational managementAmazonABSTRACT This study aims to show the organizational capacity and structure of the forest management system of the State of Amapá, Brazil. The research was based on the principles applied in Public Administration functions. We found that forest management in Amapá is performed by four State agencies consisting of two management systems that act on the production side, with one being in direct administration as the formulator of forestry policy, and one being an autonomous agency linked to the previous one as executor of forestry policy, and the other two systems being more directly linked to protection, with one being a formulator of environmental policy and the other its executor. There was a statistically significant correlation between the perceptions of public officers and the users of institutions regarding the organizational system. Some conflicts were observed between the four institutions in terms of forest administration responsibilities. We concluded that the maintenance of the existing forest coverage is not directly due to institutional capacities.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300116Floresta e Ambiente v.25 n.3 2018reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087.033616info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRocha,José das Dores de SáSilva,José de ArimatéaHoeflich,Vitor AfonsoSantos,Anadalvo Juazeiro dosLuchesa,Claudioeng2018-07-23T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872018000300116Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2018-07-23T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
title |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
spellingShingle |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil Rocha,José das Dores de Sá governance organizational management Amazon |
title_short |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
title_full |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
title_sort |
Forest Management in the State of Amapá, Brazil |
author |
Rocha,José das Dores de Sá |
author_facet |
Rocha,José das Dores de Sá Silva,José de Arimatéa Hoeflich,Vitor Afonso Santos,Anadalvo Juazeiro dos Luchesa,Claudio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva,José de Arimatéa Hoeflich,Vitor Afonso Santos,Anadalvo Juazeiro dos Luchesa,Claudio |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha,José das Dores de Sá Silva,José de Arimatéa Hoeflich,Vitor Afonso Santos,Anadalvo Juazeiro dos Luchesa,Claudio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
governance organizational management Amazon |
topic |
governance organizational management Amazon |
description |
ABSTRACT This study aims to show the organizational capacity and structure of the forest management system of the State of Amapá, Brazil. The research was based on the principles applied in Public Administration functions. We found that forest management in Amapá is performed by four State agencies consisting of two management systems that act on the production side, with one being in direct administration as the formulator of forestry policy, and one being an autonomous agency linked to the previous one as executor of forestry policy, and the other two systems being more directly linked to protection, with one being a formulator of environmental policy and the other its executor. There was a statistically significant correlation between the perceptions of public officers and the users of institutions regarding the organizational system. Some conflicts were observed between the four institutions in terms of forest administration responsibilities. We concluded that the maintenance of the existing forest coverage is not directly due to institutional capacities. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300116 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872018000300116 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2179-8087.033616 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente v.25 n.3 2018 reponame:Floresta e Ambiente instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
collection |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br|| |
_version_ |
1750128142099415040 |