Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Ambiente Contábil |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/19788 |
Resumo: | Purpose: The present study sought to investigate whether tax management influences the cost of equity of Brazilian companies listed in Brazil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3) in the period from 2014 to 2018. Methodology: The study included the analysis of the Proxie Book-Tax Differences (BTD) as a tool for identifying tax management, as suggested in the work of Moreira e Silva (2019), as well as the control variables, which are the return on equity (ROE), market value (QTOBIN), company size (LNAT) and company financial leverage (ALV). For data collection, the Bloomberg® database and the Reference Form available on the B3 website were used. For that, it was used the Multiple Linear Regression of the data type in balanced panel, resulting in a final sample formed by 630 observations. Results: Through the BTD proxie, referring to the difference between accounting profit and tax profit, and used to capture tax management in this research, it was not possible to identify any relationship with the cost of equity. Thus, for the purposes of this research, the theoretical adequacy and the statistical models used did not show that good tax management practices have a positive or negative effect on the cost of equity. Contributions of the Study: It is observed that Brazilian studies did not analyze the effect of tax management on the cost of equity in Brazilian companies using the Book-Tax Differences (BTD) indicator as a tool for identifying tax management and its influence on the cost of capital. So, this research followed the recommendation suggested by Moreira e Silva (2019), to analyze this cost with another indicator, in this case, Book-Tax Differences (BTD). According to the results, it was not possible to identify any relationship with the cost of equity, thus contributing to the consolidation of the findings by Goh et al. (2016) and Moreira e Silva (2019) who present CashETR as the best metric for tax management, given that the results presented using the variables ETR and BTD, demonstrated that the cost of capital required by investors was unrelated to the fiscal aggressiveness of companies. |
id |
UFRN-3_ea2ad057a663c465941683b6d456af67 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/19788 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-3 |
network_name_str |
Revista Ambiente Contábil |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companiesGestión tributaria: análisis de la influencia en el costo del patrimonio de las empresas brasileñasGerenciamento tributário: análise da influência sobre o custo do capital próprio das empresas brasileirasTax Management, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Cost of Equity.Gestión fiscal, diferencias libro-impuesto (BTD), coste del patrimonio.Gerenciamento Tributário, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Custo de Capital Próprio.Gerenciamento TributárioPurpose: The present study sought to investigate whether tax management influences the cost of equity of Brazilian companies listed in Brazil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3) in the period from 2014 to 2018. Methodology: The study included the analysis of the Proxie Book-Tax Differences (BTD) as a tool for identifying tax management, as suggested in the work of Moreira e Silva (2019), as well as the control variables, which are the return on equity (ROE), market value (QTOBIN), company size (LNAT) and company financial leverage (ALV). For data collection, the Bloomberg® database and the Reference Form available on the B3 website were used. For that, it was used the Multiple Linear Regression of the data type in balanced panel, resulting in a final sample formed by 630 observations. Results: Through the BTD proxie, referring to the difference between accounting profit and tax profit, and used to capture tax management in this research, it was not possible to identify any relationship with the cost of equity. Thus, for the purposes of this research, the theoretical adequacy and the statistical models used did not show that good tax management practices have a positive or negative effect on the cost of equity. Contributions of the Study: It is observed that Brazilian studies did not analyze the effect of tax management on the cost of equity in Brazilian companies using the Book-Tax Differences (BTD) indicator as a tool for identifying tax management and its influence on the cost of capital. So, this research followed the recommendation suggested by Moreira e Silva (2019), to analyze this cost with another indicator, in this case, Book-Tax Differences (BTD). According to the results, it was not possible to identify any relationship with the cost of equity, thus contributing to the consolidation of the findings by Goh et al. (2016) and Moreira e Silva (2019) who present CashETR as the best metric for tax management, given that the results presented using the variables ETR and BTD, demonstrated that the cost of capital required by investors was unrelated to the fiscal aggressiveness of companies.Objetivo: El presente estudio buscó investigar si la gestión fiscal influye en el costo del capital de las empresas brasileñas que cotizan en Brasil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3) en el período de 2014 a 2018. Metodología: El estudio incluyó el análisis de Proxie Book-Tax Differences (BTD) como una herramienta para identificar la gestión tributaria, como se sugiere en el trabajo de Moreira e Silva (2019), así como las variables de control, que son el rendimiento del capital (ROE), valor de mercado (QTOBIN), tamaño de la empresa (LNAT) y apalancamiento financiero de la empresa (ALV). Para la recopilación de datos, se utilizaron la base de datos Bloomberg® y el Formulario de referencia disponible en el sitio web B3. Para eso, se utilizó la regresión lineal múltiple del tipo de datos en el panel equilibrado, lo que resultó en una muestra final formada por 630 observaciones. Resultados: A través del proxy BTD, refiriéndose a la diferencia entre el beneficio contable y el beneficio fiscal, y utilizado para capturar la gestión fiscal en esta investigación, no fue posible identificar ninguna relación con el costo del patrimonio. Por lo tanto, a los fines de esta investigación, la adecuación teórica y los modelos estadísticos utilizados no mostraron que las buenas prácticas de gestión tributaria tengan un efecto positivo o negativo en el costo de la equidad. Contribuciones del Estudio: Se observa que los estudios brasileños no analizaron el efecto de la gestión tributaria sobre el costo de la equidad en las empresas brasileñas utilizando el indicador Book-Tax Differences (BTD) como herramienta para identificar la gestión tributaria y su influencia en el costo del capital. Entonces, esta investigación siguió la recomendación sugerida por Moreira e Silva (2019), para analizar este costo con otro indicador, en este caso, las diferencias de impuestos en libros (BTD). Según los resultados, no fue posible identificar ninguna relación con el costo de la equidad, lo que contribuyó a la consolidación de los hallazgos de Goh et al. (2016) y Moreira e Silva (2019), quienes presentan CashETR como la mejor métrica para la gestión fiscal, dado que los resultados presentados utilizando las variables ETR y BTD, demostraron que el costo de capital requerido por los inversores no estaba relacionado con la agresividad fiscal de las empresas.Objetivo: O presente estudo buscou investigar se o gerenciamento tributário influencia no custo de capital próprio das empresas brasileiras listadas no Brasil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3) no período de 2014 a 2018. Metodologia: O estudo compreendeu a análise da proxie Book-Tax Differences (BTD) como ferramenta de identificação do gerenciamento tributário, como sugerido no trabalho de Moreira e Silva (2019), bem como as variáveis de controle, que são o retorno sobre o patrimônio líquido (ROE), valor de mercado (QTOBIN), tamanho da companhia (LNAT) e alavancagem financeira da empresa (ALV). Para a coleta de dados utilizou-se o banco de dados da Bloomberg® e o Formulário de Referência disponível no sítio eletrônico do B3. Para tanto, utilizou-se da Regressão Linear Múltipla do tipo dados em painel balanceado, resultando em uma amostra final formada por 630 observações. Resultados: Por meio da proxie BTD, referente à diferença entre lucro contábil e lucro tributário, e utilizado para capturar o gerenciamento tributário nessa pesquisa, não foi possível identificar qualquer relação com o custo de capital próprio. Assim, para fins dessa pesquisa, a adequação teórica e os modelos estatísticos utilizados não evidenciaram que boas práticas de gerenciamento tributário tenham efeito positivo ou negativo no custo de capital próprio. Contribuições do Estudo: Observa-se que os estudos brasileiros não analisaram o efeito do gerenciamento tributário sobre o custo de capital próprio nas empresas brasileiras utilizando o indicador Book-Tax Differences (BTD) como ferramenta de identificação do gerenciamento tributário e a sua influência no custo de capital. Então, a presente pesquisa seguiu a recomendação sugerida por Moreira e Silva (2019), de analisar esse custo com outro indicador, neste caso, Book-Tax Differences (BTD). De acordo com os resultados, não foi possível identificar qualquer relação com o custo de capital próprio, contribuindo, assim, para a consolidação dos achados de Goh et al. (2016) e de Moreira e Silva (2019) que apresentam o CashETR como melhor métrica para o gerenciamento tributário, tendo em vista que os resultados apresentados utilizando as variáveis ETR e BTD, demonstraram que o custo de capital exigido pelos investidores não teve relação com a agressividade fiscal das empresas.Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN2021-07-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/1978810.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2ID19788REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): Jul./Dez.; 20-40REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2021): Jul./Dez.; 20-40REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036; v. 13 n. 2 (2021): Jul./Dez.; 20-402176-903610.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2reponame:Revista Ambiente Contábilinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/19788/14351Copyright (c) 2021 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBelisa Marques de Freitas, Hana Scartaty Moreira, CaritsaRaquel Pereira da Silva, AnnandyCarlos Soares do Nascimento, ÍtaloCalyo Varela de Melo, Geison2023-01-18T20:57:21Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/19788Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambientePUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/oai||prof.mauriciocsilva@gmail.com2176-90362176-9036opendoar:2023-01-18T20:57:21Revista Ambiente Contábil - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies Gestión tributaria: análisis de la influencia en el costo del patrimonio de las empresas brasileñas Gerenciamento tributário: análise da influência sobre o custo do capital próprio das empresas brasileiras |
title |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies |
spellingShingle |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies Belisa Marques de Freitas, Hana Tax Management, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Cost of Equity. Gestión fiscal, diferencias libro-impuesto (BTD), coste del patrimonio. Gerenciamento Tributário, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Custo de Capital Próprio. Gerenciamento Tributário |
title_short |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies |
title_full |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies |
title_fullStr |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies |
title_sort |
Tax management: analysis of the influence on the cost of equity of Brazilian companies |
author |
Belisa Marques de Freitas, Hana |
author_facet |
Belisa Marques de Freitas, Hana Scartaty Moreira, Caritsa Raquel Pereira da Silva, Annandy Carlos Soares do Nascimento, Ítalo Calyo Varela de Melo, Geison |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Scartaty Moreira, Caritsa Raquel Pereira da Silva, Annandy Carlos Soares do Nascimento, Ítalo Calyo Varela de Melo, Geison |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Belisa Marques de Freitas, Hana Scartaty Moreira, Caritsa Raquel Pereira da Silva, Annandy Carlos Soares do Nascimento, Ítalo Calyo Varela de Melo, Geison |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Tax Management, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Cost of Equity. Gestión fiscal, diferencias libro-impuesto (BTD), coste del patrimonio. Gerenciamento Tributário, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Custo de Capital Próprio. Gerenciamento Tributário |
topic |
Tax Management, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Cost of Equity. Gestión fiscal, diferencias libro-impuesto (BTD), coste del patrimonio. Gerenciamento Tributário, Book-Tax Differences (BTD), Custo de Capital Próprio. Gerenciamento Tributário |
description |
Purpose: The present study sought to investigate whether tax management influences the cost of equity of Brazilian companies listed in Brazil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3) in the period from 2014 to 2018. Methodology: The study included the analysis of the Proxie Book-Tax Differences (BTD) as a tool for identifying tax management, as suggested in the work of Moreira e Silva (2019), as well as the control variables, which are the return on equity (ROE), market value (QTOBIN), company size (LNAT) and company financial leverage (ALV). For data collection, the Bloomberg® database and the Reference Form available on the B3 website were used. For that, it was used the Multiple Linear Regression of the data type in balanced panel, resulting in a final sample formed by 630 observations. Results: Through the BTD proxie, referring to the difference between accounting profit and tax profit, and used to capture tax management in this research, it was not possible to identify any relationship with the cost of equity. Thus, for the purposes of this research, the theoretical adequacy and the statistical models used did not show that good tax management practices have a positive or negative effect on the cost of equity. Contributions of the Study: It is observed that Brazilian studies did not analyze the effect of tax management on the cost of equity in Brazilian companies using the Book-Tax Differences (BTD) indicator as a tool for identifying tax management and its influence on the cost of capital. So, this research followed the recommendation suggested by Moreira e Silva (2019), to analyze this cost with another indicator, in this case, Book-Tax Differences (BTD). According to the results, it was not possible to identify any relationship with the cost of equity, thus contributing to the consolidation of the findings by Goh et al. (2016) and Moreira e Silva (2019) who present CashETR as the best metric for tax management, given that the results presented using the variables ETR and BTD, demonstrated that the cost of capital required by investors was unrelated to the fiscal aggressiveness of companies. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-07-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/19788 10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2ID19788 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/19788 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2ID19788 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/19788/14351 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 13 No. 2 (2021): Jul./Dez.; 20-40 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 13 Núm. 2 (2021): Jul./Dez.; 20-40 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036; v. 13 n. 2 (2021): Jul./Dez.; 20-40 2176-9036 10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2 reponame:Revista Ambiente Contábil instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Revista Ambiente Contábil |
collection |
Revista Ambiente Contábil |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ambiente Contábil - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||prof.mauriciocsilva@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1799770189155270656 |