Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Toledo, Wellington da
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Agápto, João Paulo, de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Agro@mbiente on-line
Texto Completo: https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080
Resumo: The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.
id UFRR-4_5b486371bde5c12a31e60fa48eae1a76
oai_identifier_str oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/4080
network_acronym_str UFRR-4
network_name_str Agro@mbiente on-line
repository_id_str
spelling Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategiesCommon bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategiesAgricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos.The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.UFRR2017-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/408010.18227/1982-8470ragro.v11i4.4080AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 11 No. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 11 Núm. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 11 n. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-3061982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080/2353Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Toledo, Wellington daAgápto, João Paulode Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca2017-10-03T21:04:22Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/4080Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2017-10-03T21:04:22Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
title Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
spellingShingle Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
Silva Toledo, Wellington da
Agricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos.
title_short Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
title_full Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
title_fullStr Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
title_full_unstemmed Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
title_sort Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
author Silva Toledo, Wellington da
author_facet Silva Toledo, Wellington da
Agápto, João Paulo
de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca
author_role author
author2 Agápto, João Paulo
de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Toledo, Wellington da
Agápto, João Paulo
de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Agricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos.
topic Agricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos.
description The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-10-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v11i4.4080
url https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080
identifier_str_mv 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v11i4.4080
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080/2353
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFRR
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 11 No. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 11 Núm. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306
REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 11 n. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306
1982-8470
reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line
instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron:UFRR
instname_str Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
instacron_str UFRR
institution UFRR
reponame_str Agro@mbiente on-line
collection Agro@mbiente on-line
repository.name.fl_str_mv Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br
_version_ 1799770041393086464