Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Agro@mbiente on-line |
Texto Completo: | https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080 |
Resumo: | The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts. |
id |
UFRR-4_5b486371bde5c12a31e60fa48eae1a76 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/4080 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRR-4 |
network_name_str |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategiesCommon bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategiesAgricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos.The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts.UFRR2017-10-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/408010.18227/1982-8470ragro.v11i4.4080AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 11 No. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 11 Núm. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 11 n. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-3061982-8470reponame:Agro@mbiente on-lineinstname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)instacron:UFRRporhttps://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080/2353Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINEinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva Toledo, Wellington daAgápto, João Paulode Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca2017-10-03T21:04:22Zoai:oai.revista.ufrr.br:article/4080Revistahttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambientePUBhttps://revista.ufrr.br/index.php/agroambiente/oai||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br1982-84701982-8470opendoar:2017-10-03T21:04:22Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
title |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
spellingShingle |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies Silva Toledo, Wellington da Agricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos. |
title_short |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
title_full |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
title_fullStr |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
title_sort |
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) productivity in response to different fertilization strategies |
author |
Silva Toledo, Wellington da |
author_facet |
Silva Toledo, Wellington da Agápto, João Paulo de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Agápto, João Paulo de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva Toledo, Wellington da Agápto, João Paulo de Almeida, Gustavo Fonseca |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Agricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos. |
topic |
Agricultura familiar. Gestão de resíduos da pecuária. Impactos ambientais. Substituição de insumos. |
description |
The feasibility of reducing non-renewable natural resources use in agriculture, associated with the need for ecologically-appropriate of organic waste disposal has become an important element in planning more sustainable agricultural systems. Consequently, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the response of the common bean, growing in an Eutrophic Latosol in the city of Buri-SP, to the application of organic and mineral fertilizers. An experiment was carried out in the 2015 agricultural year, using a randomized block design with 4 replicates and 5 treatments, these being: 1 - mineral fertilizer; 2 - organomineral fertilizer; 3 - sheep manure compost; 4 - chicken bedding compost, and control (soil without fertilizer application). The tested variables were: pod length (cm); per plant pod number; per pod seed number; mass of 100 grains (g); and grain yield (kg ha-1). Organomineral fertilizer provided the most significant increase in pod length, per plant pod number, and yield compared to the other treatments, except for sheep manure compost, where productivity did not differ. In addition, with the exception of mass per 100 seeds, there was no difference between treatments using organic fertilization and mineral fertilizer. Under the current study´s experimental conditions, organomineral fertilizer and sheep manure compost produced the highest productivity for common beans. Thus, mineral fertilization can be replaced by organic or organomineral alternatives, so helping to produce more sustainable production management and help reduce environmental impacts. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-03 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080 10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v11i4.4080 |
url |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18227/1982-8470ragro.v11i4.4080 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revista.ufrr.br/agroambiente/article/view/4080/2353 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRR |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRR |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE JOURNALRAGR; Vol. 11 No. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; Vol. 11 Núm. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306 REVISTA AGRO@MBIENTE ON-LINE; v. 11 n. 4 (2017): outubro-dezembro; 296-306 1982-8470 reponame:Agro@mbiente on-line instname:Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) instacron:UFRR |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) |
instacron_str |
UFRR |
institution |
UFRR |
reponame_str |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
collection |
Agro@mbiente on-line |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Agro@mbiente on-line - Universidade Federal de Roraima (UFRR) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||scpuchoa@dsi.ufrr.br|| arcanjoalves@oi.com.br |
_version_ |
1799770041393086464 |