Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFS |
Texto Completo: | https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/15151 |
Resumo: | The 2018 elections in Brazil were marked by a process of rupture between the political substance, in its deepest and even desirable sense for a democratic society, and the forms of communication used to represent the proposals of the candidates to the voters of all country, since the elections were determined by a massive participation of virtual reality, including the circulation of images, messages and, therefore, ideas, which boosted not only the real news, but also the so-called Fake News, as a repertoire considerable weight to understand the electoral process itself and how much this presence ended up deconstructing the very meaning of “democracy”. For all these reasons, the 2018 presidential election in Brazil, as a political-historical event, can be analyzed from different angles and / or perspectives from the The dissertation chose to investigate it having as object the editorials of the newspapers Folha de São Paulo and O Globo, analyzing themes that orbited in them and that, influencing other media, that create content from them, end up acting in the electoral universe, collaborating for the presence of what Laclau (2013) calls “empty signifiers” in the election. From this point, the main questions were defined: What were the demands used for the construction of signifiers ?; How to identify in the editorials the formation of the meanings of the logic of difference and equivalence (LACLAU, 2018) ?; and what is the role of negative advertising in the construction of the voters' identity (OLIVEIRA, 2019)? The main objective of the research was, from the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the selected editorials, to create interpretative frameworks of the collected data, which would reveal the agencies and the valences, from the empirical categories formulated. For this, the theoretical basis had names like Bruno Latour (2012) and Ernesto Laclau (2013), surrounded by Isabelle Stengers (2018), Márcio Goldman (2006), Antoine Hennion (2010) and François Jullien (1999), to support the election fabrication hypothesis.”. In methodological terms, the approach was guided by four categories to carry out the analysis of the selected editorials: the fabrication of the candidate, the fabrication of the voter, the fabrication of the election and the fabrication of becoming, a strategy used to think of the “actors” ( LATOUR, 2012) and the articulations of meaning that configured what is here called “fabrication of the 2018 presidential election”. It is expected, with the ethnographic work of analysis of the editorials, to contribute so that one can better understand the historical, social, legal and political fracture represented by the 2018 presidential election. |
id |
UFS-2_1f301ae988551203566792b29a4799ba |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ufs.br:riufs/15151 |
network_acronym_str |
UFS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Ramalho, Ítalo de MeloOliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de2022-03-16T22:04:11Z2022-03-16T22:04:11Z2020-08-31RAMALHO, Ítalo de Melo. Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil. 2020. 143 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Antropologia) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2020.https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/15151The 2018 elections in Brazil were marked by a process of rupture between the political substance, in its deepest and even desirable sense for a democratic society, and the forms of communication used to represent the proposals of the candidates to the voters of all country, since the elections were determined by a massive participation of virtual reality, including the circulation of images, messages and, therefore, ideas, which boosted not only the real news, but also the so-called Fake News, as a repertoire considerable weight to understand the electoral process itself and how much this presence ended up deconstructing the very meaning of “democracy”. For all these reasons, the 2018 presidential election in Brazil, as a political-historical event, can be analyzed from different angles and / or perspectives from the The dissertation chose to investigate it having as object the editorials of the newspapers Folha de São Paulo and O Globo, analyzing themes that orbited in them and that, influencing other media, that create content from them, end up acting in the electoral universe, collaborating for the presence of what Laclau (2013) calls “empty signifiers” in the election. From this point, the main questions were defined: What were the demands used for the construction of signifiers ?; How to identify in the editorials the formation of the meanings of the logic of difference and equivalence (LACLAU, 2018) ?; and what is the role of negative advertising in the construction of the voters' identity (OLIVEIRA, 2019)? The main objective of the research was, from the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the selected editorials, to create interpretative frameworks of the collected data, which would reveal the agencies and the valences, from the empirical categories formulated. For this, the theoretical basis had names like Bruno Latour (2012) and Ernesto Laclau (2013), surrounded by Isabelle Stengers (2018), Márcio Goldman (2006), Antoine Hennion (2010) and François Jullien (1999), to support the election fabrication hypothesis.”. In methodological terms, the approach was guided by four categories to carry out the analysis of the selected editorials: the fabrication of the candidate, the fabrication of the voter, the fabrication of the election and the fabrication of becoming, a strategy used to think of the “actors” ( LATOUR, 2012) and the articulations of meaning that configured what is here called “fabrication of the 2018 presidential election”. It is expected, with the ethnographic work of analysis of the editorials, to contribute so that one can better understand the historical, social, legal and political fracture represented by the 2018 presidential election.As eleições de 2018 no Brasil foram marcadas por um processo de ruptura entre a substância política, em seu sentido mais profundo e mesmo desejável para uma sociedade democrática, e as formas de comunicação utilizadas para representarem as propostas das candidaturas aos/às eleitores/as de todo país, visto que foram, as eleições, determinadas por uma participação maciça da realidade virtual, incluindo aí a circulação de imagens, mensagens e, portanto, ideias, que impulsionaram não apenas as notícias verdadeiras, mas também as chamadas Fake News. Por esse motivo, a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil, como um acontecimento político-histórico, pode ser analisada por diversos ângulos e/ou perspectivas a partir das tensões que a atravessam. A dissertação escolheu investigá-la tendo como objeto os editoriais dos jornais Folha de São Paulo e O Globo, analisando temas que neles orbitaram e que, influenciando outras mídias, criaram conteúdos a partir deles, terminando por atuar no universo eleitoral, colaborando para a presença do que Laclau (2013) chama de “significantes vazios” na eleição. A partir desse viés, definiram-se os principais questionamentos: Quais foram as demandas utilizadas para a construção de significantes?; Como identificar nos editoriais a formação dos sentidos das lógicas da diferença e da equivalência (LACLAU, 2018)?; e qual o papel da propaganda negativa na construção da identidade dos/das eleitores/as (OLIVEIRA, 2019)? O objetivo da pesquisa foi, a partir da análise quantitativa e qualitativa dos editoriais selecionados, criar enquadramentos interpretativos dos dados coletados, que revelassem as agências e as valências, a partir das categorias empíricas formuladas. Para isso, a base teórica contou com nomes como Ernesto Laclau (2018) e Bruno Latour (2012), circundados por Isabelle Stengers (2018), Márcio Goldman (2006), Antoine Hennion (2010) e François Jullien (1999), para sustentar a hipótese da fabricação da eleição. Em termos metodológicos, a abordagem pautou-se por quatro categorias para realizar as análises dos editoriais selecionados: a fabricação do candidato, a fabricação do eleitor, a fabricação da eleição e a fabricação do devir, estratégia utilizada para se pensar nos “atores” (LATOUR, 2012) e nas articulações de sentido que configuraram o que aqui chamamos de “fabricação da eleição presidencial de 2018”. Espera-se, com o trabalho etnográfico de análise dos editoriais, contribuir para que se possa melhor compreender a fratura histórica, social, jurídica e política representada pela eleição presidencial de 2018.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESSão CristóvãoporAntropologiaEleições no BrasilEditoriaisAspectos políticosBrasilPolítica e governoEleição presidencial 2018FabricaçãoEditoraisAnthropology2018 presidential electionManufacturingEditorialsCIENCIAS HUMANAS::ANTROPOLOGIAOs editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasilinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisPós-Graduação em AntropologiaUniversidade Federal de Sergipereponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSinstname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)instacron:UFSinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessORIGINALITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdfITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdfapplication/pdf1708246https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/2/ITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf970a265ea96c14a2289197d4799f79b1MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81475https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/1/license.txt098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44cMD51TEXTITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.txtITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain333263https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/3/ITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.txt543e345bd3b91e6cbbb7ba6e6a23087eMD53THUMBNAILITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.jpgITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1222https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/4/ITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.jpg2a6d5582e706f2ba7e0a89c49a0611c4MD54riufs/151512022-03-16 19:04:11.51oai:ufs.br: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Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://ri.ufs.br/oai/requestrepositorio@academico.ufs.bropendoar:2022-03-16T22:04:11Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
title |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
spellingShingle |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil Ramalho, Ítalo de Melo Antropologia Eleições no Brasil Editoriais Aspectos políticos Brasil Política e governo Eleição presidencial 2018 Fabricação Editorais Anthropology 2018 presidential election Manufacturing Editorials CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ANTROPOLOGIA |
title_short |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
title_full |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
title_fullStr |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
title_sort |
Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil |
author |
Ramalho, Ítalo de Melo |
author_facet |
Ramalho, Ítalo de Melo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramalho, Ítalo de Melo |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de |
contributor_str_mv |
Oliveira, Wilson José Ferreira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antropologia Eleições no Brasil Editoriais Aspectos políticos Brasil Política e governo Eleição presidencial 2018 Fabricação Editorais |
topic |
Antropologia Eleições no Brasil Editoriais Aspectos políticos Brasil Política e governo Eleição presidencial 2018 Fabricação Editorais Anthropology 2018 presidential election Manufacturing Editorials CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ANTROPOLOGIA |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Anthropology 2018 presidential election Manufacturing Editorials |
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv |
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::ANTROPOLOGIA |
description |
The 2018 elections in Brazil were marked by a process of rupture between the political substance, in its deepest and even desirable sense for a democratic society, and the forms of communication used to represent the proposals of the candidates to the voters of all country, since the elections were determined by a massive participation of virtual reality, including the circulation of images, messages and, therefore, ideas, which boosted not only the real news, but also the so-called Fake News, as a repertoire considerable weight to understand the electoral process itself and how much this presence ended up deconstructing the very meaning of “democracy”. For all these reasons, the 2018 presidential election in Brazil, as a political-historical event, can be analyzed from different angles and / or perspectives from the The dissertation chose to investigate it having as object the editorials of the newspapers Folha de São Paulo and O Globo, analyzing themes that orbited in them and that, influencing other media, that create content from them, end up acting in the electoral universe, collaborating for the presence of what Laclau (2013) calls “empty signifiers” in the election. From this point, the main questions were defined: What were the demands used for the construction of signifiers ?; How to identify in the editorials the formation of the meanings of the logic of difference and equivalence (LACLAU, 2018) ?; and what is the role of negative advertising in the construction of the voters' identity (OLIVEIRA, 2019)? The main objective of the research was, from the quantitative and qualitative analysis of the selected editorials, to create interpretative frameworks of the collected data, which would reveal the agencies and the valences, from the empirical categories formulated. For this, the theoretical basis had names like Bruno Latour (2012) and Ernesto Laclau (2013), surrounded by Isabelle Stengers (2018), Márcio Goldman (2006), Antoine Hennion (2010) and François Jullien (1999), to support the election fabrication hypothesis.”. In methodological terms, the approach was guided by four categories to carry out the analysis of the selected editorials: the fabrication of the candidate, the fabrication of the voter, the fabrication of the election and the fabrication of becoming, a strategy used to think of the “actors” ( LATOUR, 2012) and the articulations of meaning that configured what is here called “fabrication of the 2018 presidential election”. It is expected, with the ethnographic work of analysis of the editorials, to contribute so that one can better understand the historical, social, legal and political fracture represented by the 2018 presidential election. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-08-31 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16T22:04:11Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-16T22:04:11Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv |
RAMALHO, Ítalo de Melo. Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil. 2020. 143 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Antropologia) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2020. |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/15151 |
identifier_str_mv |
RAMALHO, Ítalo de Melo. Os editoriais e a eleição presidencial de 2018 no Brasil. 2020. 143 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Antropologia) – Universidade Federal de Sergipe, São Cristóvão, 2020. |
url |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/handle/riufs/15151 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Graduação em Antropologia |
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFS instname:Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) instacron:UFS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
instacron_str |
UFS |
institution |
UFS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/2/ITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/1/license.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/3/ITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.txt https://ri.ufs.br/jspui/bitstream/riufs/15151/4/ITALO_MELO_RAMALHO.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
970a265ea96c14a2289197d4799f79b1 098cbbf65c2c15e1fb2e49c5d306a44c 543e345bd3b91e6cbbb7ba6e6a23087e 2a6d5582e706f2ba7e0a89c49a0611c4 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFS - Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
repositorio@academico.ufs.br |
_version_ |
1802110776277729280 |