Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Salvador, Evilasio da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Katálysis (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76
Resumo: The purpose of this article is to reveal how mandatory budget allotments for social policies facilitate or impede attending the interests of the bourgeoisie and its fractions, highlighting as an example the differences between educational policy, for which there are mandatory spending requirements, and housing policy, which does not have this obligation. To do so, it looks at the presumptions in relation to the state and its role in guaranteeing the conditions of production and maintenance of bourgeois hegemony, especially through the use of allocation of government funds to distinct factions of the bourgeoisie. The article then presents different visions about the budget ties and financing of social policies and then presents systematized data based on the government budget and Statements on Tax Spending (fiscal exemptions) from 2003 until 2015, to reveal the space for the reproduction of capital in educational and housing policies, even if with differences in degree due to mandatory budget allocations or not.
id UFSC-10_da17ab7dbe57b8962fc3561d88db7732
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51135
network_acronym_str UFSC-10
network_name_str Revista Katálysis (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotmentsHegemonia e políticas sociais no Brasil: contribuições ao debate sobre vinculação orçamentáriaThe purpose of this article is to reveal how mandatory budget allotments for social policies facilitate or impede attending the interests of the bourgeoisie and its fractions, highlighting as an example the differences between educational policy, for which there are mandatory spending requirements, and housing policy, which does not have this obligation. To do so, it looks at the presumptions in relation to the state and its role in guaranteeing the conditions of production and maintenance of bourgeois hegemony, especially through the use of allocation of government funds to distinct factions of the bourgeoisie. The article then presents different visions about the budget ties and financing of social policies and then presents systematized data based on the government budget and Statements on Tax Spending (fiscal exemptions) from 2003 until 2015, to reveal the space for the reproduction of capital in educational and housing policies, even if with differences in degree due to mandatory budget allocations or not.Este artigo tem por objetivo evidenciar como a vinculação orçamentária para as políticas sociais facilita ou dificulta o atendimento aos interesses da burguesia e suas frações, destacando como ilustração as diferenças entre a política educacional, com vinculação orçamentária, e a política habitacional, que não possui tal obrigatoriedade. Para isso, trabalham-se os pressupostos com relação ao Estado e seu papel na garantia das condições de produção e na manutenção da hegemonia burguesa, especialmente a partir da destinação do fundo público às distintas frações da burguesia. Em seguida, são apresentadas as diferentes visões acerca da vinculação orçamentária e os financiamentos das políticas sociais, para posteriormente apresentar os dados sistematizados a partir do orçamento público e do Demonstrativo de Gastos Tributários (renúncias tributárias) entre os anos de 2003 e 2015, buscando evidenciar o espaço para a reprodução do capital nas políticas de educação e habitação, ainda que com diferenças em grau devido à vinculação de recursos ou sua ausência.Revista KatálysisRevista KatálysisRevista Katálysis2018-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p7610.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85Revista Katálysis; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-851982-02591414-4980reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76/36197Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Ramos Ribeiro, Evilasio da Silva Salvadorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Isabela RamosSalvador, Evilasio da Silva2018-04-05T16:00:02Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51135Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/oairevistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com1982-02591414-4980opendoar:2018-04-05T16:00:02Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
Hegemonia e políticas sociais no Brasil: contribuições ao debate sobre vinculação orçamentária
title Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
spellingShingle Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos
title_short Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
title_full Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
title_fullStr Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
title_full_unstemmed Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
title_sort Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
author Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos
author_facet Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos
Salvador, Evilasio da Silva
author_role author
author2 Salvador, Evilasio da Silva
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos
Salvador, Evilasio da Silva
description The purpose of this article is to reveal how mandatory budget allotments for social policies facilitate or impede attending the interests of the bourgeoisie and its fractions, highlighting as an example the differences between educational policy, for which there are mandatory spending requirements, and housing policy, which does not have this obligation. To do so, it looks at the presumptions in relation to the state and its role in guaranteeing the conditions of production and maintenance of bourgeois hegemony, especially through the use of allocation of government funds to distinct factions of the bourgeoisie. The article then presents different visions about the budget ties and financing of social policies and then presents systematized data based on the government budget and Statements on Tax Spending (fiscal exemptions) from 2003 until 2015, to reveal the space for the reproduction of capital in educational and housing policies, even if with differences in degree due to mandatory budget allocations or not.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-02-09
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76
10.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76/36197
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Ramos Ribeiro, Evilasio da Silva Salvador
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Ramos Ribeiro, Evilasio da Silva Salvador
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
Revista Katálysis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85
Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85
Revista Katálysis; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85
1982-0259
1414-4980
reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Katálysis (Online)
collection Revista Katálysis (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com
_version_ 1789434942130749440