Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Katálysis (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is to reveal how mandatory budget allotments for social policies facilitate or impede attending the interests of the bourgeoisie and its fractions, highlighting as an example the differences between educational policy, for which there are mandatory spending requirements, and housing policy, which does not have this obligation. To do so, it looks at the presumptions in relation to the state and its role in guaranteeing the conditions of production and maintenance of bourgeois hegemony, especially through the use of allocation of government funds to distinct factions of the bourgeoisie. The article then presents different visions about the budget ties and financing of social policies and then presents systematized data based on the government budget and Statements on Tax Spending (fiscal exemptions) from 2003 until 2015, to reveal the space for the reproduction of capital in educational and housing policies, even if with differences in degree due to mandatory budget allocations or not. |
id |
UFSC-10_da17ab7dbe57b8962fc3561d88db7732 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51135 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotmentsHegemonia e políticas sociais no Brasil: contribuições ao debate sobre vinculação orçamentáriaThe purpose of this article is to reveal how mandatory budget allotments for social policies facilitate or impede attending the interests of the bourgeoisie and its fractions, highlighting as an example the differences between educational policy, for which there are mandatory spending requirements, and housing policy, which does not have this obligation. To do so, it looks at the presumptions in relation to the state and its role in guaranteeing the conditions of production and maintenance of bourgeois hegemony, especially through the use of allocation of government funds to distinct factions of the bourgeoisie. The article then presents different visions about the budget ties and financing of social policies and then presents systematized data based on the government budget and Statements on Tax Spending (fiscal exemptions) from 2003 until 2015, to reveal the space for the reproduction of capital in educational and housing policies, even if with differences in degree due to mandatory budget allocations or not.Este artigo tem por objetivo evidenciar como a vinculação orçamentária para as políticas sociais facilita ou dificulta o atendimento aos interesses da burguesia e suas frações, destacando como ilustração as diferenças entre a política educacional, com vinculação orçamentária, e a política habitacional, que não possui tal obrigatoriedade. Para isso, trabalham-se os pressupostos com relação ao Estado e seu papel na garantia das condições de produção e na manutenção da hegemonia burguesa, especialmente a partir da destinação do fundo público às distintas frações da burguesia. Em seguida, são apresentadas as diferentes visões acerca da vinculação orçamentária e os financiamentos das políticas sociais, para posteriormente apresentar os dados sistematizados a partir do orçamento público e do Demonstrativo de Gastos Tributários (renúncias tributárias) entre os anos de 2003 e 2015, buscando evidenciar o espaço para a reprodução do capital nas políticas de educação e habitação, ainda que com diferenças em grau devido à vinculação de recursos ou sua ausência.Revista KatálysisRevista KatálysisRevista Katálysis2018-02-09info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p7610.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85Revista Katálysis; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-851982-02591414-4980reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76/36197Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Ramos Ribeiro, Evilasio da Silva Salvadorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Isabela RamosSalvador, Evilasio da Silva2018-04-05T16:00:02Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51135Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/oairevistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com1982-02591414-4980opendoar:2018-04-05T16:00:02Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments Hegemonia e políticas sociais no Brasil: contribuições ao debate sobre vinculação orçamentária |
title |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments |
spellingShingle |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos |
title_short |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments |
title_full |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments |
title_fullStr |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments |
title_sort |
Hegemony and Social Policies in Brazil: Contributions to the debate about mandatory budget allotments |
author |
Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos Salvador, Evilasio da Silva |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Salvador, Evilasio da Silva |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Isabela Ramos Salvador, Evilasio da Silva |
description |
The purpose of this article is to reveal how mandatory budget allotments for social policies facilitate or impede attending the interests of the bourgeoisie and its fractions, highlighting as an example the differences between educational policy, for which there are mandatory spending requirements, and housing policy, which does not have this obligation. To do so, it looks at the presumptions in relation to the state and its role in guaranteeing the conditions of production and maintenance of bourgeois hegemony, especially through the use of allocation of government funds to distinct factions of the bourgeoisie. The article then presents different visions about the budget ties and financing of social policies and then presents systematized data based on the government budget and Statements on Tax Spending (fiscal exemptions) from 2003 until 2015, to reveal the space for the reproduction of capital in educational and housing policies, even if with differences in degree due to mandatory budget allocations or not. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-02-09 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76 10.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/katalysis/article/view/1982-02592018v21n1p76/36197 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Ramos Ribeiro, Evilasio da Silva Salvador info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Isabela Ramos Ribeiro, Evilasio da Silva Salvador |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis Revista Katálysis |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 No. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85 Revista Katálysis; Vol. 21 Núm. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85 Revista Katálysis; v. 21 n. 1 (2018): Estado, Economia e Democracia no Brasil e América Latina; 76-85 1982-0259 1414-4980 reponame:Revista Katálysis (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
collection |
Revista Katálysis (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Katálysis (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistakatalysis@gmail.com || kataly@cse.ufsc.br || revistakatalysis@hotmail.com |
_version_ |
1789434942130749440 |