Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2001 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Estudos Feministas |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/S0104-026X2001000200015 |
Resumo: | This paper discusses Foucault’s concepts of power, subjectification and (a)normality, as well as Homi Bhabha’s concepts of culture and difference, in relation to the question of the feminine enunciation as articulated by the psychoanalyst Maria Rita Kehl. The article assesses how discourses on women are constructed in different televised products, emphasizing the symbolic emptiness/silences of the feminine. According to Kehl, for both men and women this fact is a consequence of “the cursed dimension in our culture,” since women have been historically in a position in which the subject is always the other: be it the father, the phallic mother or the partner |
id |
UFSC-11_75c526192eba4f973cbfa3e69951f5be |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/9638 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-11 |
network_name_str |
Revista Estudos Feministas |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on TelevisionMÍDIA E EDUCAÇÃO DA MULHER: UMA DISCUSSÃO TEÓRICA SOBRE MODOS DE ENUNCIAR O FEMININO NA TVThis paper discusses Foucault’s concepts of power, subjectification and (a)normality, as well as Homi Bhabha’s concepts of culture and difference, in relation to the question of the feminine enunciation as articulated by the psychoanalyst Maria Rita Kehl. The article assesses how discourses on women are constructed in different televised products, emphasizing the symbolic emptiness/silences of the feminine. According to Kehl, for both men and women this fact is a consequence of “the cursed dimension in our culture,” since women have been historically in a position in which the subject is always the other: be it the father, the phallic mother or the partnerNeste trabalho discutem-se os conceitos de poder, subjetivação e (a)normalidade, de Michel Foucault, bem como os conceitos de cultura e diferença propostos por Homi Bhabha, em relação à temática da enunciação do feminino, conforme a psicanalista Maria Rita Kehl. Tal discussão é feita no sentido de expor a fundamentação de uma pesquisa em andamento sobre a subjetividade feminina na mídia televisiva, a qual dá continuidade a investigações anteriores, cujos resultados são também brevemente comentados. O que está em jogo é uma descrição de como se constrói um discurso sobre as mulheres em diferentes produtos televisivos, atentando para os vazios do simbólico em relação ao feminino. Este, conforme Kehl, tanto para os homens como para as mulheres, “constitui a dimensão maldita na nossa cultura”, já que as mulheres estariam historicamente numa posição em que o sujeito é sempre o outro: ou o pai, ou a mãe fálica ou o parceiro.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2001-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/S0104-026X200100020001510.1590/S0104-026X2001000200015Revista Estudos Feministas; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2001); 586Revista Estudos Feministas; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2001); 586Revista Estudos Feministas; v. 9 n. 2 (2001); 5861806-95840104-026Xreponame:Revista Estudos Feministasinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/S0104-026X2001000200015/8869Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Estudos Feministasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFischer, Rosa Maria Bueno2022-11-21T14:23:24Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/9638Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/oai||ref@cfh.ufsc.br1806-95840104-026Xopendoar:2022-11-21T11:37:37.225409Revista Estudos Feministas - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television MÍDIA E EDUCAÇÃO DA MULHER: UMA DISCUSSÃO TEÓRICA SOBRE MODOS DE ENUNCIAR O FEMININO NA TV |
title |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television |
spellingShingle |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television Fischer, Rosa Maria Bueno |
title_short |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television |
title_full |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television |
title_fullStr |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television |
title_full_unstemmed |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television |
title_sort |
Media and Woman’s Education: A Theoretical Discussion about the Ways to Enunciate the Feminine on Television |
author |
Fischer, Rosa Maria Bueno |
author_facet |
Fischer, Rosa Maria Bueno |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fischer, Rosa Maria Bueno |
description |
This paper discusses Foucault’s concepts of power, subjectification and (a)normality, as well as Homi Bhabha’s concepts of culture and difference, in relation to the question of the feminine enunciation as articulated by the psychoanalyst Maria Rita Kehl. The article assesses how discourses on women are constructed in different televised products, emphasizing the symbolic emptiness/silences of the feminine. According to Kehl, for both men and women this fact is a consequence of “the cursed dimension in our culture,” since women have been historically in a position in which the subject is always the other: be it the father, the phallic mother or the partner |
publishDate |
2001 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2001-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/S0104-026X2001000200015 10.1590/S0104-026X2001000200015 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/S0104-026X2001000200015 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/S0104-026X2001000200015 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/ref/article/view/S0104-026X2001000200015/8869 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Estudos Feministas info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Estudos Feministas |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estudos Feministas; Vol. 9 No. 2 (2001); 586 Revista Estudos Feministas; Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2001); 586 Revista Estudos Feministas; v. 9 n. 2 (2001); 586 1806-9584 0104-026X reponame:Revista Estudos Feministas instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista Estudos Feministas |
collection |
Revista Estudos Feministas |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estudos Feministas - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ref@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435247358640128 |