Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: da Silva, Maria Alice
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: INTERthesis
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42
Resumo: The aim of this paper is to present Steven Wise’s concept of practical autonomy and how it is distinguished from the traditional and modern Kantian notion of autonomy. This is justified in order to emphasize the importance of this concept of autonomy for the recognition of legal rights to nonhuman animals, and the protection of its particular way of life through care practices and responsibility in the relations between human and nonhuman animals. By the aid of bibliographical research and theoretical analysis, we foremost present Wise’s main conceptual distinctions and, secondly, indicate the application of the concept of practical autonomy in the legal context, aiming to recognize rights for animals. Finally, we show how the concept of practical autonomy requires more than legal rights. It also implies moral obligations by individual agents and by the State to ensure appropriate conditions for autonomy and freedom of nonhuman animals. 
id UFSC-13_25c7aa87bffc28b720e278c1b8377b95
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39564
network_acronym_str UFSC-13
network_name_str INTERthesis
repository_id_str
spelling Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomyDerechos y cuidado para la protección de la autonomía práctica de los animales no humanosDireitos e cuidado para a proteção da autonomia prática de animais não humanosThe aim of this paper is to present Steven Wise’s concept of practical autonomy and how it is distinguished from the traditional and modern Kantian notion of autonomy. This is justified in order to emphasize the importance of this concept of autonomy for the recognition of legal rights to nonhuman animals, and the protection of its particular way of life through care practices and responsibility in the relations between human and nonhuman animals. By the aid of bibliographical research and theoretical analysis, we foremost present Wise’s main conceptual distinctions and, secondly, indicate the application of the concept of practical autonomy in the legal context, aiming to recognize rights for animals. Finally, we show how the concept of practical autonomy requires more than legal rights. It also implies moral obligations by individual agents and by the State to ensure appropriate conditions for autonomy and freedom of nonhuman animals. El objetivo del presente artículo es presentar el concepto de autonomía práctica de Steven Wise y el modo cómo éste se distingue de la noción tradicional y moderna de autonomía kantiana, buscando evidenciar la importancia de esa noción de autonomía para el reconocimiento de derechos jurídicos a los animales no humanos y la protección de sus formas específicas de vida por medio de prácticas de cuidado y de responsabilidad en las relaciones entre humanos con no-humanos. Por medio de investigación bibliográfica y análisis teórico, se buscará, inicialmente, presentar las distinciones conceptuales centrales de Wise y, posteriormente, indicar la aplicación del concepto de autonomía práctica en el ámbito jurídico, teniendo en cuenta el reconocimiento de derechos a los animales. Por fin, se muestra cómo el concepto de autonomía práctica requiere más que derechos jurídicos, ya que implica obligaciones morales por parte de agentes individuales y del Estado para asegurar las condiciones adecuadas de autonomía y de libertad de animales no humanos.  O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o conceito de autonomia prática de Steven Wise e o modo como se distingue da noção tradicional e moderna de autonomia kantiana, buscando evidenciar a importância dessa noção de autonomia para o reconhecimento de direitos jurídicos aos animais não humanos e a proteção de suas formas específicas de vida por meio de práticas de cuidado e de responsabilidade nas relações entre humanos para com não humanos. Por meio da investigação bibliográfica e análise teórica, busca-se, inicialmente, apresentar as distinções conceituais centrais de Wise para, na sequência, indicar a aplicação do conceito de autonomia prática no âmbito jurídico, tendo em vista o reconhecimento de direitos aos animais. Por fim, mostra-se como o conceito de autonomia prática requer mais do que direitos jurídicos. Ele implica obrigações morais por parte de agentes individuais e do Estado para assegurar as condições adequadas de autonomia e liberdade de animais não humanos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2015-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p4210.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 42-64Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 42-64Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 42-641807-1384reponame:INTERthesisinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42/29652Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Maria AliceKuhnen, Tânia Aparecida2024-03-15T08:46:38Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39564Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/oaiinterthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br1807-13841807-1384opendoar:2024-03-15T08:46:38INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
Derechos y cuidado para la protección de la autonomía práctica de los animales no humanos
Direitos e cuidado para a proteção da autonomia prática de animais não humanos
title Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
spellingShingle Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
da Silva, Maria Alice
title_short Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
title_full Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
title_fullStr Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
title_full_unstemmed Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
title_sort Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
author da Silva, Maria Alice
author_facet da Silva, Maria Alice
Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
author_role author
author2 Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv da Silva, Maria Alice
Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida
description The aim of this paper is to present Steven Wise’s concept of practical autonomy and how it is distinguished from the traditional and modern Kantian notion of autonomy. This is justified in order to emphasize the importance of this concept of autonomy for the recognition of legal rights to nonhuman animals, and the protection of its particular way of life through care practices and responsibility in the relations between human and nonhuman animals. By the aid of bibliographical research and theoretical analysis, we foremost present Wise’s main conceptual distinctions and, secondly, indicate the application of the concept of practical autonomy in the legal context, aiming to recognize rights for animals. Finally, we show how the concept of practical autonomy requires more than legal rights. It also implies moral obligations by individual agents and by the State to ensure appropriate conditions for autonomy and freedom of nonhuman animals. 
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-07-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42
10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42/29652
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 42-64
Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 42-64
Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 42-64
1807-1384
reponame:INTERthesis
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str INTERthesis
collection INTERthesis
repository.name.fl_str_mv INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv interthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br
_version_ 1799875118319534080

Registros relacionados