Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | INTERthesis |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to present Steven Wise’s concept of practical autonomy and how it is distinguished from the traditional and modern Kantian notion of autonomy. This is justified in order to emphasize the importance of this concept of autonomy for the recognition of legal rights to nonhuman animals, and the protection of its particular way of life through care practices and responsibility in the relations between human and nonhuman animals. By the aid of bibliographical research and theoretical analysis, we foremost present Wise’s main conceptual distinctions and, secondly, indicate the application of the concept of practical autonomy in the legal context, aiming to recognize rights for animals. Finally, we show how the concept of practical autonomy requires more than legal rights. It also implies moral obligations by individual agents and by the State to ensure appropriate conditions for autonomy and freedom of nonhuman animals. |
id |
UFSC-13_25c7aa87bffc28b720e278c1b8377b95 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39564 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-13 |
network_name_str |
INTERthesis |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomyDerechos y cuidado para la protección de la autonomía práctica de los animales no humanosDireitos e cuidado para a proteção da autonomia prática de animais não humanosThe aim of this paper is to present Steven Wise’s concept of practical autonomy and how it is distinguished from the traditional and modern Kantian notion of autonomy. This is justified in order to emphasize the importance of this concept of autonomy for the recognition of legal rights to nonhuman animals, and the protection of its particular way of life through care practices and responsibility in the relations between human and nonhuman animals. By the aid of bibliographical research and theoretical analysis, we foremost present Wise’s main conceptual distinctions and, secondly, indicate the application of the concept of practical autonomy in the legal context, aiming to recognize rights for animals. Finally, we show how the concept of practical autonomy requires more than legal rights. It also implies moral obligations by individual agents and by the State to ensure appropriate conditions for autonomy and freedom of nonhuman animals. El objetivo del presente artículo es presentar el concepto de autonomía práctica de Steven Wise y el modo cómo éste se distingue de la noción tradicional y moderna de autonomía kantiana, buscando evidenciar la importancia de esa noción de autonomía para el reconocimiento de derechos jurídicos a los animales no humanos y la protección de sus formas específicas de vida por medio de prácticas de cuidado y de responsabilidad en las relaciones entre humanos con no-humanos. Por medio de investigación bibliográfica y análisis teórico, se buscará, inicialmente, presentar las distinciones conceptuales centrales de Wise y, posteriormente, indicar la aplicación del concepto de autonomía práctica en el ámbito jurídico, teniendo en cuenta el reconocimiento de derechos a los animales. Por fin, se muestra cómo el concepto de autonomía práctica requiere más que derechos jurídicos, ya que implica obligaciones morales por parte de agentes individuales y del Estado para asegurar las condiciones adecuadas de autonomía y de libertad de animales no humanos. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o conceito de autonomia prática de Steven Wise e o modo como se distingue da noção tradicional e moderna de autonomia kantiana, buscando evidenciar a importância dessa noção de autonomia para o reconhecimento de direitos jurídicos aos animais não humanos e a proteção de suas formas específicas de vida por meio de práticas de cuidado e de responsabilidade nas relações entre humanos para com não humanos. Por meio da investigação bibliográfica e análise teórica, busca-se, inicialmente, apresentar as distinções conceituais centrais de Wise para, na sequência, indicar a aplicação do conceito de autonomia prática no âmbito jurídico, tendo em vista o reconhecimento de direitos aos animais. Por fim, mostra-se como o conceito de autonomia prática requer mais do que direitos jurídicos. Ele implica obrigações morais por parte de agentes individuais e do Estado para assegurar as condições adequadas de autonomia e liberdade de animais não humanos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2015-07-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p4210.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 42-64Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 42-64Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 42-641807-1384reponame:INTERthesisinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42/29652Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessda Silva, Maria AliceKuhnen, Tânia Aparecida2024-03-15T08:46:38Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/39564Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/oaiinterthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br1807-13841807-1384opendoar:2024-03-15T08:46:38INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy Derechos y cuidado para la protección de la autonomía práctica de los animales no humanos Direitos e cuidado para a proteção da autonomia prática de animais não humanos |
title |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy |
spellingShingle |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy da Silva, Maria Alice |
title_short |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy |
title_full |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy |
title_fullStr |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy |
title_sort |
Rights and care for the protection of nonhuman animal’s practical autonomy |
author |
da Silva, Maria Alice |
author_facet |
da Silva, Maria Alice Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
da Silva, Maria Alice Kuhnen, Tânia Aparecida |
description |
The aim of this paper is to present Steven Wise’s concept of practical autonomy and how it is distinguished from the traditional and modern Kantian notion of autonomy. This is justified in order to emphasize the importance of this concept of autonomy for the recognition of legal rights to nonhuman animals, and the protection of its particular way of life through care practices and responsibility in the relations between human and nonhuman animals. By the aid of bibliographical research and theoretical analysis, we foremost present Wise’s main conceptual distinctions and, secondly, indicate the application of the concept of practical autonomy in the legal context, aiming to recognize rights for animals. Finally, we show how the concept of practical autonomy requires more than legal rights. It also implies moral obligations by individual agents and by the State to ensure appropriate conditions for autonomy and freedom of nonhuman animals. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-07-08 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42 10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/interthesis/article/view/1807-1384.2015v12n1p42/29652 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Interdisciplinary International Journal - INTERthesis; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2015); 42-64 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinaria INTERthesis; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2015); 42-64 Revista Internacional Interdisciplinar INTERthesis; v. 12 n. 1 (2015); 42-64 1807-1384 reponame:INTERthesis instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
INTERthesis |
collection |
INTERthesis |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
INTERthesis - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
interthesis@gmail.com||interthesis@cfh.ufsc.br||cimbalista@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1805392705381990400 |