Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências da Administração |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91 |
Resumo: | This article, considering the lack of sources that synthesize propositions models for sustainability management in an organizational context, after identifying five models, proposes to compare them making use of a reference frame created to represent ideal conditions for sustainability management in organizations. For the comparative analysis were identified conceptual advances, convergences, and weaknesses. A key finding reveals the incompleteness of the models. As they are compared with each other and with the reference frame all of them have shown fails in some fundamental respect for achieving organizational sustainability. It was realized the need for greater insights when it comes to deploying and operating models of sustainability management in organizations. In summary, this study provided to create information to eliminating weaknesses and to suggest improvements. This can guide improvements applicable to the development of a global unifying framework of good experiences to systemic and structural management organizational sustainability. |
id |
UFSC-15_541286bf0a8801903dc8eacb3ad09811 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/27440 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-15 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its managementSustentabilidade em Contexto Organizacional: uma análise comparativa de modelos que propõem trajetórias para sua gestãoThis article, considering the lack of sources that synthesize propositions models for sustainability management in an organizational context, after identifying five models, proposes to compare them making use of a reference frame created to represent ideal conditions for sustainability management in organizations. For the comparative analysis were identified conceptual advances, convergences, and weaknesses. A key finding reveals the incompleteness of the models. As they are compared with each other and with the reference frame all of them have shown fails in some fundamental respect for achieving organizational sustainability. It was realized the need for greater insights when it comes to deploying and operating models of sustainability management in organizations. In summary, this study provided to create information to eliminating weaknesses and to suggest improvements. This can guide improvements applicable to the development of a global unifying framework of good experiences to systemic and structural management organizational sustainability.Este artigo, considerando a inexistência de fontes que sintetizam proposições de modelos para a gestão da sustentabilidade em contexto organizacional, depois de identificar cinco modelos, se propõe a compará-los fazendo uso de um quadro referência criado para representar condições ideais de gestão da sustentabilidade nas organizações. Pela análise comparativa foram identificados avanços conceituais, convergências, e fragilidades. Uma das principais constatações denuncia a incompletude dos modelos. À medida que são comparados entre si e com o quadro referência todos demonstraram falhar em algum aspecto basilar para o alcance da sustentabilidade organizacional. Percebeu-se a necessidade de maiores aprofundamentos quando se trata da implantação e operacionalização de modelos de gestão da sustentabilidade nas organizações. Em suma, este estudo permitiu criar informações para a eliminação de fragilidades e para a sugestão de avanços. Isso pode orientar aprimoramentos cabíveis ao desenvolvimento de um framework global unificador das boas experiências para a gestão sistêmica e estrutural da sustentabilidade organizacional.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionRevisão de Literaturaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p9110.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 91-1102175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMunck, LucianoBansi, Ana ClaudiaGalleli, Bárbara2017-07-12T11:41:01Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/27440Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2017-07-12T11:41:01Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management Sustentabilidade em Contexto Organizacional: uma análise comparativa de modelos que propõem trajetórias para sua gestão |
title |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management |
spellingShingle |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management Munck, Luciano |
title_short |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management |
title_full |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management |
title_fullStr |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management |
title_sort |
Sustainability in Organizational Context: a comparative analysis of models that suggest paths for its management |
author |
Munck, Luciano |
author_facet |
Munck, Luciano Bansi, Ana Claudia Galleli, Bárbara |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bansi, Ana Claudia Galleli, Bárbara |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Munck, Luciano Bansi, Ana Claudia Galleli, Bárbara |
description |
This article, considering the lack of sources that synthesize propositions models for sustainability management in an organizational context, after identifying five models, proposes to compare them making use of a reference frame created to represent ideal conditions for sustainability management in organizations. For the comparative analysis were identified conceptual advances, convergences, and weaknesses. A key finding reveals the incompleteness of the models. As they are compared with each other and with the reference frame all of them have shown fails in some fundamental respect for achieving organizational sustainability. It was realized the need for greater insights when it comes to deploying and operating models of sustainability management in organizations. In summary, this study provided to create information to eliminating weaknesses and to suggest improvements. This can guide improvements applicable to the development of a global unifying framework of good experiences to systemic and structural management organizational sustainability. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Revisão de Literatura |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91 10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p91/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 91-110 2175-8077 1516-3865 reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
collection |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435142099435520 |