Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências da Administração |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66 |
Resumo: | The present study aims to analyze how the concept of “legitimacy” has been evolving in the Stakeholders Theory. To that end, an exploratory and qualitative research has been done based on integrative literature review. The results showed that the concept of “legitimacy” still is imprecise and rarely discussed in the stakeholder literature. Few authors have attempted to formulate a definition for the concept and the majority adopts the most accepted definition. Some studies, despite using the term "legitimacy", do not offer any definition employed. Discrepancy related to legitimacy typology, aspects and objectives were found. The concept is commonly adapted to the context and objective which it is being used to. An important factor that contributes to the imprecision in the definition of the term "legitimacy" derives from the use of a very broad concept for "stakeholder". Therefore, the study contributes to the development of the concept of “legitimacy” in regard to Stakeholders Theory. |
id |
UFSC-15_c062fa80b83816d87ca7ad66163e2e7b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/37650 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-15 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders TheoryLegitimidade: uma análise da evolução do conceito na teoria dos stakeholdersThe present study aims to analyze how the concept of “legitimacy” has been evolving in the Stakeholders Theory. To that end, an exploratory and qualitative research has been done based on integrative literature review. The results showed that the concept of “legitimacy” still is imprecise and rarely discussed in the stakeholder literature. Few authors have attempted to formulate a definition for the concept and the majority adopts the most accepted definition. Some studies, despite using the term "legitimacy", do not offer any definition employed. Discrepancy related to legitimacy typology, aspects and objectives were found. The concept is commonly adapted to the context and objective which it is being used to. An important factor that contributes to the imprecision in the definition of the term "legitimacy" derives from the use of a very broad concept for "stakeholder". Therefore, the study contributes to the development of the concept of “legitimacy” in regard to Stakeholders Theory.O presente estudo buscou analisar como o conceito de “legitimidade” tem evoluído na Teoria dos Stakeholders. Para isso, foi realizada uma pesquisa exploratória qualitativa baseada em pesquisa bibliográfica. Os resultados mostraram que o conceito de legitimidade é ainda bastante impreciso e pouco debatido na literatura de stakeholders. Poucos autores buscaram formular uma definição para o conceito e a maioria adota a definição mais aceita. Há ainda trabalhos que, apesar de utilizarem o termo “legitimidade”, não oferecem nenhum tipo de definição empregada. Foram encontradas divergências relativas a tipologias, aspectos e objetos da legitimidade. O conceito é comumente adaptado ao contexto e ao objetivo para o qual é utilizado. Um importante fator que contribui para a imprecisão na definição do termo “legitimidade” deriva da própria utilização de um conceito bastante amplo para “stakeholder”. Portanto, o presente estudo contribui com o desenvolvimento do conceito de “legitimidade” na Teoria dos Stakeholders.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2016-04-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p6610.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 66-802175-80771516-3865reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administraçãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarakat, Simone RuchdiFreitas, Livia PaulucciBoaventura, João Maurício GamaMacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty2017-07-12T11:37:59Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/37650Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/admPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/oairevista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br2175-80771516-3865opendoar:2017-07-12T11:37:59Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory Legitimidade: uma análise da evolução do conceito na teoria dos stakeholders |
title |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory |
spellingShingle |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory Barakat, Simone Ruchdi |
title_short |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory |
title_full |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory |
title_fullStr |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory |
title_sort |
Legitimacy: Concept Development Analysis under Stakeholders Theory |
author |
Barakat, Simone Ruchdi |
author_facet |
Barakat, Simone Ruchdi Freitas, Livia Paulucci Boaventura, João Maurício Gama MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas, Livia Paulucci Boaventura, João Maurício Gama MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Barakat, Simone Ruchdi Freitas, Livia Paulucci Boaventura, João Maurício Gama MacLennan, Maria Laura Ferranty |
description |
The present study aims to analyze how the concept of “legitimacy” has been evolving in the Stakeholders Theory. To that end, an exploratory and qualitative research has been done based on integrative literature review. The results showed that the concept of “legitimacy” still is imprecise and rarely discussed in the stakeholder literature. Few authors have attempted to formulate a definition for the concept and the majority adopts the most accepted definition. Some studies, despite using the term "legitimacy", do not offer any definition employed. Discrepancy related to legitimacy typology, aspects and objectives were found. The concept is commonly adapted to the context and objective which it is being used to. An important factor that contributes to the imprecision in the definition of the term "legitimacy" derives from the use of a very broad concept for "stakeholder". Therefore, the study contributes to the development of the concept of “legitimacy” in regard to Stakeholders Theory. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-04-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66 10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/adm/article/view/2175-8077.2016v18n44p66/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista de Ciências da Administração |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências da Administração; V.18 N.44 Abril de 2016; 66-80 2175-8077 1516-3865 reponame:Revista de Ciências da Administração instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
collection |
Revista de Ciências da Administração |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências da Administração - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revista@cse.ufsc.br||mfpcris@gmail.com||rca.cse@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435142471680000 |