Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Quinaud, Ricardo Teixeira
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Backes, Ana Flávia, Silva, Daiane Cardoso da, Nascimento, Juarez Vieira do, Ramos, Valmor, Milistetd, Michel
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318
Resumo: The validation of this questionnaire is an important tool for analyzing the knowledge and skills of coaches, as well as a better understanding of their practice context. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish the content validity of the Coaches’ Knowledge and Competence Questionnaire (CKCQ). Five specialists with doctorate degree for at least 10 years, academic experience and periodicity of publications with the theme in national and international journals participated in the validation process. Specialists evaluated 38 items of the questionnaire and assigned a score on a 1-5 point likert scale for each item in the language clarity, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance criteria. The content validity coefficient (CVC) was used to determine the CVCI of items and the CVCt of the total instrument of each criterion, adopting cutoff point of 0.81. The approximate results found for language clarity (0.92), practical pertinence (0.99) and theoretical relevance (0.98) presented values considered almost perfect and appropriate for validation. The content validation of the CKCQ is an important alternative for the evaluation of the knowledge and competences of sports coaches. 
id UFSC-16_867b86062a277d27a7a2b677e48fd688
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51804
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQConstrução e validação do conteúdo do questionário dos conhecimentos e competências do treinador - QCCTThe validation of this questionnaire is an important tool for analyzing the knowledge and skills of coaches, as well as a better understanding of their practice context. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish the content validity of the Coaches’ Knowledge and Competence Questionnaire (CKCQ). Five specialists with doctorate degree for at least 10 years, academic experience and periodicity of publications with the theme in national and international journals participated in the validation process. Specialists evaluated 38 items of the questionnaire and assigned a score on a 1-5 point likert scale for each item in the language clarity, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance criteria. The content validity coefficient (CVC) was used to determine the CVCI of items and the CVCt of the total instrument of each criterion, adopting cutoff point of 0.81. The approximate results found for language clarity (0.92), practical pertinence (0.99) and theoretical relevance (0.98) presented values considered almost perfect and appropriate for validation. The content validation of the CKCQ is an important alternative for the evaluation of the knowledge and competences of sports coaches. A validação do presente questionário apresenta-se como importante ferramenta para a análise dos conhecimentos e competências de treinadores, bem como melhor entendimento de seu contexto de prática. Para tanto, o objetivo do presente estudo foi estabelecer a validade de conteúdo do Questionário acerca dos Conhecimentos e Competências Funcionais do Treinador Esportivo (QCCT). Participaram do processo de validação cinco especialistas com titulação de doutor há pelo menos 10 anos, experiência acadêmica e periodicidade de publicações com a temática em revista nacionais e internacionais. Os especialistas avaliaram 38 itens do questionário e atribuíram uma nota em uma escala likert de um a cinco para cada item nos critérios de clareza de linguagem, pertinência prática e relevância teórica. Fez-se o uso do coeficiente de validade (CVC) para determinação do CVCI dos itens e o CVCt do total do instrumento de cada critério, adotando como ponto de corte 0,81. Os resultados aproximados encontrados para clareza de linguagem (0,92), pertinência prática (0,99) e relevância teórica (0,98) apresentaram valores considerados quase perfeitos e apropriados para sua validação. A partir da validação do conteúdo, o QCCT mostra-se como uma importante alternativa para a avaliação dos conhecimentos e competências dos treinadores esportivos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2018-06-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Original articleAvaliado por ParesArtigos originaisapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2018v20n3p31810.1590/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2018); 318-331Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 20 n. 3 (2018); 318-3311980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318/36958Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessQuinaud, Ricardo TeixeiraBackes, Ana FláviaSilva, Daiane Cardoso daNascimento, Juarez Vieira doRamos, ValmorMilistetd, Michel2018-09-03T10:58:23Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/51804Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-09-03T10:58:23Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
Construção e validação do conteúdo do questionário dos conhecimentos e competências do treinador - QCCT
title Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
spellingShingle Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
Quinaud, Ricardo Teixeira
title_short Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
title_full Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
title_fullStr Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
title_full_unstemmed Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
title_sort Construction and content validity of the coaches’ knowledge and competence questionnaire - CKCQ
author Quinaud, Ricardo Teixeira
author_facet Quinaud, Ricardo Teixeira
Backes, Ana Flávia
Silva, Daiane Cardoso da
Nascimento, Juarez Vieira do
Ramos, Valmor
Milistetd, Michel
author_role author
author2 Backes, Ana Flávia
Silva, Daiane Cardoso da
Nascimento, Juarez Vieira do
Ramos, Valmor
Milistetd, Michel
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quinaud, Ricardo Teixeira
Backes, Ana Flávia
Silva, Daiane Cardoso da
Nascimento, Juarez Vieira do
Ramos, Valmor
Milistetd, Michel
description The validation of this questionnaire is an important tool for analyzing the knowledge and skills of coaches, as well as a better understanding of their practice context. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to establish the content validity of the Coaches’ Knowledge and Competence Questionnaire (CKCQ). Five specialists with doctorate degree for at least 10 years, academic experience and periodicity of publications with the theme in national and international journals participated in the validation process. Specialists evaluated 38 items of the questionnaire and assigned a score on a 1-5 point likert scale for each item in the language clarity, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance criteria. The content validity coefficient (CVC) was used to determine the CVCI of items and the CVCt of the total instrument of each criterion, adopting cutoff point of 0.81. The approximate results found for language clarity (0.92), practical pertinence (0.99) and theoretical relevance (0.98) presented values considered almost perfect and appropriate for validation. The content validation of the CKCQ is an important alternative for the evaluation of the knowledge and competences of sports coaches. 
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-06-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Original article
Avaliado por Pares
Artigos originais
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318
10.1590/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2018v20n3p318/36958
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 20 No. 3 (2018); 318-331
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 20 n. 3 (2018); 318-331
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435125057978368

Registros relacionados