Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribas, Schelyne
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Aburachid, Layla Maria Campos, Morales, Juan Carlos Pérez, Monteiro, Gabriella Nelli, Praça, Gibson Moreira, Castro, Henrique Oliveira, Greco, Pablo Juan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/72376
Resumo: The main objective of this study was to establish content validity evidences in the Motor Coordination Test with Ball (MCTB). Four Ph.D. professors and former sports coaches with academic experience in the motor coordination area took part of the validation process as experts. The experts assessed four motor tasks and graded using the Likert scale from one to five for criteria of clarity of language, practice relevance, and theoretical relevance. The content validity coefficient (CVC) has been used to determine the CVCc of each task and the CVCt for the instrument as a whole, adopting as a cutoff CVCc .70 and CVCt .80. The results showed good agreement among experts concerning “clarity of language” (CVC= .89), “practice relevance” (CVC= .81), and theoretical relevance (CVC= .86). For “practice relevance” of images and videos of task execution, there has been observed CVCt of .86 and CVCt of .95, respectively. When requested the order of relevance of coordination pressures, the agreement among experts presented the existence of at least four coordination pressures in each one of the tasks and, out of these, at least two had a higher relevance. After the calculation of the CVC, ecological validity was determined for the MCTB, accrediting it as an instrument for the assessment of motor coordination with ball in the context of sports games. 
id UFSC-16_b504bf21524a19781c454ce56905edc9
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/72376
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ballEvidências de validade de conteúdo do teste de coordenação motora com bolaThe main objective of this study was to establish content validity evidences in the Motor Coordination Test with Ball (MCTB). Four Ph.D. professors and former sports coaches with academic experience in the motor coordination area took part of the validation process as experts. The experts assessed four motor tasks and graded using the Likert scale from one to five for criteria of clarity of language, practice relevance, and theoretical relevance. The content validity coefficient (CVC) has been used to determine the CVCc of each task and the CVCt for the instrument as a whole, adopting as a cutoff CVCc .70 and CVCt .80. The results showed good agreement among experts concerning “clarity of language” (CVC= .89), “practice relevance” (CVC= .81), and theoretical relevance (CVC= .86). For “practice relevance” of images and videos of task execution, there has been observed CVCt of .86 and CVCt of .95, respectively. When requested the order of relevance of coordination pressures, the agreement among experts presented the existence of at least four coordination pressures in each one of the tasks and, out of these, at least two had a higher relevance. After the calculation of the CVC, ecological validity was determined for the MCTB, accrediting it as an instrument for the assessment of motor coordination with ball in the context of sports games. Objetivou-se estabelecer evidências de validade de conteúdo do Teste de Coordenação motora com bola (TCMB). Participaram como especialistas do processo de validação quatro professores doutores e ex-treinadores esportivos com experiência acadêmica na área da coordenação motora. Os especialistas avaliaram 4 tarefas motoras e atribuíram uma nota em uma escala tipo Likert de um a cinco pontos para os critérios de clareza de linguagem, pertinência prática e relevância teórica. Recorreu-se ao coeficiente de validade (CVC) para determinação do CVCc de cada tarefa e o CVCt para o instrumento como um todo, adotando como ponto de corte CVCc .70 e CVCt .80. Os resultados evidenciaram boa concordância dos especialistas quanto à “clareza de linguagem” (CVC= .89), “pertinência prática” (CVC= .81) e “relevância teórica” (CVC= .86). Para a “pertinência prática” das figuras e vídeos de execução das tarefas, observou-se CVCt de .86 e CVCt de .95, respectivamente. Quando solicitada a ordem de relevância das pressões coordenativas, a concordância entre avaliadores apresentou existência de ao menos quatro pressões coordenativas em cada tarefa e destas ao menos duas pressões com maior relevância. Após o cálculo do CVC, determinou-se a validade ecológica do TCMB aprovando-o como um instrumento para a avaliação da coordenação motora com bola no contexto dos jogos esportivo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2020-11-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Avaliado por ParesDescritiva; Validação de Instrumentoapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/72376Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e72376 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e72376 1980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/72376/44626Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibas, SchelyneAburachid, Layla Maria CamposMorales, Juan Carlos PérezMonteiro, Gabriella NelliPraça, Gibson MoreiraCastro, Henrique OliveiraGreco, Pablo Juan2020-08-06T13:49:19Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/72376Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2020-08-06T13:49:19Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
Evidências de validade de conteúdo do teste de coordenação motora com bola
title Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
spellingShingle Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
Ribas, Schelyne
title_short Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
title_full Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
title_fullStr Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
title_full_unstemmed Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
title_sort Content validity evidences in the motor coordination test with ball
author Ribas, Schelyne
author_facet Ribas, Schelyne
Aburachid, Layla Maria Campos
Morales, Juan Carlos Pérez
Monteiro, Gabriella Nelli
Praça, Gibson Moreira
Castro, Henrique Oliveira
Greco, Pablo Juan
author_role author
author2 Aburachid, Layla Maria Campos
Morales, Juan Carlos Pérez
Monteiro, Gabriella Nelli
Praça, Gibson Moreira
Castro, Henrique Oliveira
Greco, Pablo Juan
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribas, Schelyne
Aburachid, Layla Maria Campos
Morales, Juan Carlos Pérez
Monteiro, Gabriella Nelli
Praça, Gibson Moreira
Castro, Henrique Oliveira
Greco, Pablo Juan
description The main objective of this study was to establish content validity evidences in the Motor Coordination Test with Ball (MCTB). Four Ph.D. professors and former sports coaches with academic experience in the motor coordination area took part of the validation process as experts. The experts assessed four motor tasks and graded using the Likert scale from one to five for criteria of clarity of language, practice relevance, and theoretical relevance. The content validity coefficient (CVC) has been used to determine the CVCc of each task and the CVCt for the instrument as a whole, adopting as a cutoff CVCc .70 and CVCt .80. The results showed good agreement among experts concerning “clarity of language” (CVC= .89), “practice relevance” (CVC= .81), and theoretical relevance (CVC= .86). For “practice relevance” of images and videos of task execution, there has been observed CVCt of .86 and CVCt of .95, respectively. When requested the order of relevance of coordination pressures, the agreement among experts presented the existence of at least four coordination pressures in each one of the tasks and, out of these, at least two had a higher relevance. After the calculation of the CVC, ecological validity was determined for the MCTB, accrediting it as an instrument for the assessment of motor coordination with ball in the context of sports games. 
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Avaliado por Pares
Descritiva; Validação de Instrumento
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/72376
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/72376
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/72376/44626
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 22 (2020); e72376
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 22 (2020); e72376
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435125976530944