Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Diefenthaeler, Fernando
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Sakugawa, Raphael Luiz, Dellagrana, Rodolfo André, Follmer, Bruno, Lemos, Elisa Cristina, Campos, Wagner de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108
Resumo:   Several studies showed that respiratory exchange ratio (RER) have been used as an alternative to evaluate the aerobic capacity in a single incremental test. However, few studies have investigated trained runners. The aim of this study was to verify if the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) could be used as an alternative criterion for estimating anaerobic threshold (AT) in long-distance runners. Nineteen male long-distance runners volunteered to participate in the study. An incremental treadmill test was performed with initial speed of 10 km·h-1 with increments of 1 km·h-1 every 1 min until voluntary exhaustion. The variables measured were oxygen uptake (VO2), first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), intensity corresponding to RER level of1.0 (iRER1.0), peak velocity (PV), heart rate (HR), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE). One-way repeated measure analysis variance was used, following Bonferroni post hoc test. Agreement between parameters was evaluated by Pearson correlation and dispersion error. There were no significant differences between iRER1.0 and VT2 parameters. The correlations were significant between iRER1.0 and VT2 parameters for absolute and relative VO2, speed, and HR (r=0.95; r=0.60; r=0.72; r=0.81, respectively). A small mean error (-0.2 km·h-1) was observed between iRER1.0 and VT2. However, it was also observed an overestimation trend for high speeds. In conclusion, iRER1.0 can be used as an alternative method to detect AT in long distance runners. However, its use is limited in runners with high aerobic capacity.
id UFSC-16_e6e817f07404092f9ebf54b73ba2e256
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49157
network_acronym_str UFSC-16
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?A razão de troca respiratória é uma alternativa para estimar o limiar anaeróbio em corredores treinados?  Several studies showed that respiratory exchange ratio (RER) have been used as an alternative to evaluate the aerobic capacity in a single incremental test. However, few studies have investigated trained runners. The aim of this study was to verify if the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) could be used as an alternative criterion for estimating anaerobic threshold (AT) in long-distance runners. Nineteen male long-distance runners volunteered to participate in the study. An incremental treadmill test was performed with initial speed of 10 km·h-1 with increments of 1 km·h-1 every 1 min until voluntary exhaustion. The variables measured were oxygen uptake (VO2), first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), intensity corresponding to RER level of1.0 (iRER1.0), peak velocity (PV), heart rate (HR), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE). One-way repeated measure analysis variance was used, following Bonferroni post hoc test. Agreement between parameters was evaluated by Pearson correlation and dispersion error. There were no significant differences between iRER1.0 and VT2 parameters. The correlations were significant between iRER1.0 and VT2 parameters for absolute and relative VO2, speed, and HR (r=0.95; r=0.60; r=0.72; r=0.81, respectively). A small mean error (-0.2 km·h-1) was observed between iRER1.0 and VT2. However, it was also observed an overestimation trend for high speeds. In conclusion, iRER1.0 can be used as an alternative method to detect AT in long distance runners. However, its use is limited in runners with high aerobic capacity.  Diversos estudos demonstram que a razão de troca respiratória (RER) tem sido utilizada como uma alternativa para estimar a capacidade aeróbia em único teste incremental. No entanto, poucos estudos foram realizados com corredores treinados. Sendo assim, o objetivo do estudo foi avaliar a utilização do RER como uma alternativa para estimar o limiar anaeróbio (AT) em corredores de longa distância. Dezenove corredores de longa distância do sexo masculino participaram do estudo. Foi realizado um teste incremental com velocidade inicial de 10 km·h-1 com incrementos de 1 km·h-1 a cada minuto até a exaustão voluntária. As variáveis mensuradas foram consumo de oxigênio (VO2), limiares ventilatórios (VT1 e VT2), intensidade correspondente ao RER no valor igual a 1,0 (iRER1.0), pico de velocidade (PV), frequência cardíaca (HR) e percepção subjetiva de esforço (RPE). Foi realizada a análise de variância de medidas repetidas do tipo one-way, seguido do teste post hoc de Bonferroni. A relação entre as variáveis foi verificada pela correlação de Pearson e a concordância por meio da medida de dispersão dos erros. Não houve diferença significativa entre as variáveis iRER1.0 e VT2. Foram encontradas correlações significativas entre as variáveis iRER1.0 e VT2 para os valores absolutos e relativos de VO2, velocidade e HR (r=0,95; r=0,60; r=0,72; r=0,81, respectivamente). Um pequeno erro médio (-0,2 km·h-1) foi observado entre iRER1.0 e VT2, bem como uma tendência de superestimação em altas velocidade. Em conclusão, iRER1.0 pode ser utilizado como um método alternativo para detectar o AT em corredores de longa distância, entretanto, seu uso é limitado em corredores com alta capacidade aeróbia.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil2017-05-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion"Avaliado por Pares",Original paperAvaliado por ParesArtigos Originaisapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2017v19n1p10810.1590/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2017); 108-117Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 19 n. 1 (2017); 108-1171980-00371415-8426reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108/34144Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDiefenthaeler, FernandoSakugawa, Raphael LuizDellagrana, Rodolfo AndréFollmer, BrunoLemos, Elisa CristinaCampos, Wagner de2018-12-05T10:43:05Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49157Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/PUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/oairbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1980-00371415-8426opendoar:2018-12-05T10:43:05Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
A razão de troca respiratória é uma alternativa para estimar o limiar anaeróbio em corredores treinados?
title Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
spellingShingle Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
Diefenthaeler, Fernando
title_short Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
title_full Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
title_fullStr Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
title_full_unstemmed Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
title_sort Is respiratory exchange ratio an alternative to estimate anaerobic threshold in trained runners?
author Diefenthaeler, Fernando
author_facet Diefenthaeler, Fernando
Sakugawa, Raphael Luiz
Dellagrana, Rodolfo André
Follmer, Bruno
Lemos, Elisa Cristina
Campos, Wagner de
author_role author
author2 Sakugawa, Raphael Luiz
Dellagrana, Rodolfo André
Follmer, Bruno
Lemos, Elisa Cristina
Campos, Wagner de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Diefenthaeler, Fernando
Sakugawa, Raphael Luiz
Dellagrana, Rodolfo André
Follmer, Bruno
Lemos, Elisa Cristina
Campos, Wagner de
description   Several studies showed that respiratory exchange ratio (RER) have been used as an alternative to evaluate the aerobic capacity in a single incremental test. However, few studies have investigated trained runners. The aim of this study was to verify if the respiratory exchange ratio (RER) could be used as an alternative criterion for estimating anaerobic threshold (AT) in long-distance runners. Nineteen male long-distance runners volunteered to participate in the study. An incremental treadmill test was performed with initial speed of 10 km·h-1 with increments of 1 km·h-1 every 1 min until voluntary exhaustion. The variables measured were oxygen uptake (VO2), first and second ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2, respectively), intensity corresponding to RER level of1.0 (iRER1.0), peak velocity (PV), heart rate (HR), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE). One-way repeated measure analysis variance was used, following Bonferroni post hoc test. Agreement between parameters was evaluated by Pearson correlation and dispersion error. There were no significant differences between iRER1.0 and VT2 parameters. The correlations were significant between iRER1.0 and VT2 parameters for absolute and relative VO2, speed, and HR (r=0.95; r=0.60; r=0.72; r=0.81, respectively). A small mean error (-0.2 km·h-1) was observed between iRER1.0 and VT2. However, it was also observed an overestimation trend for high speeds. In conclusion, iRER1.0 can be used as an alternative method to detect AT in long distance runners. However, its use is limited in runners with high aerobic capacity.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-28
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
"Avaliado por Pares",
Original paper
Avaliado por Pares
Artigos Originais
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108
10.1590/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/1980-0037.2017v19n1p108/34144
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Florianópolis, SC. Brasil
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2017); 108-117
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano; v. 19 n. 1 (2017); 108-117
1980-0037
1415-8426
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria & Desempenho Humano (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rbcdh@contato.ufsc.br || portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435124663713792