The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128 |
Resumo: | From the Nietzsche’s emphasis that God is dead – basic principle of the secularization – and the concept of religion, from the substantivist and functionalist perspectives, this paper addresses the contribution of some authors, classical (Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Freud) and modern (Eliade, Bourdieu, Habermas, Hervieu-Leger, Grace Davie, Heelas), in the important discussion of the (dis) enchantment of the world. Another issue considered is the role of religion in the contemporary society, in the context of a “reenchanted” world, with significant changes in the “market of symbolic goods”, characterized by an individualization/privatization of faith, deterritorialization of the sacred space, religious pluralism (with new and diffused religious practices) and by the phenomenon of Pentecostalism. |
id |
UFSC-18_227e5ad361f64ce24ae5f2d9d375f8c6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53259 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the worldO Erro de Nietzsche e a (não) Morte de Deus: o (des)encantamento do mundoFrom the Nietzsche’s emphasis that God is dead – basic principle of the secularization – and the concept of religion, from the substantivist and functionalist perspectives, this paper addresses the contribution of some authors, classical (Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Freud) and modern (Eliade, Bourdieu, Habermas, Hervieu-Leger, Grace Davie, Heelas), in the important discussion of the (dis) enchantment of the world. Another issue considered is the role of religion in the contemporary society, in the context of a “reenchanted” world, with significant changes in the “market of symbolic goods”, characterized by an individualization/privatization of faith, deterritorialization of the sacred space, religious pluralism (with new and diffused religious practices) and by the phenomenon of Pentecostalism.A partir da ideia de Nietzsche de que Deus está morto – princípio básico da secularização – e do conceito de religião, em uma perspectiva substantivista e funcionalista, este texto aborda a contribuição de alguns autores, clássicos (Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Freud) e modernos (Eliade, Bourdieu, Habermas, Hervieu-Léger, Grace Davie, Heelas), na importante discussão sobre o (des) encantamento do mundo. Outro tema em foco é o papel da religião na sociedade contemporânea, no contexto de um mundo “reencantado’” com mudanças significativas no “mercado de bens simbólicos”, marcado por uma individualização/privatização da fé, desterritorialização do espaço sagrado, pluralismo religioso (com novas e difusas práticas religiosas) e pelo fenômeno do pentecostalismo.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2017-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p12810.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 36 (2017); 128-142Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 36 (2017); 128-142Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 36 (2017); 128-1422175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128/35099Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRodrigues, Donizete2017-10-17T18:13:45Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/53259Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2017-10-17T18:13:45Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world O Erro de Nietzsche e a (não) Morte de Deus: o (des)encantamento do mundo |
title |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world |
spellingShingle |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world Rodrigues, Donizete |
title_short |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world |
title_full |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world |
title_fullStr |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world |
title_sort |
The Nietzsche’s “Error”, God is not Dead: the (dis) enchantment of the world |
author |
Rodrigues, Donizete |
author_facet |
Rodrigues, Donizete |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Donizete |
description |
From the Nietzsche’s emphasis that God is dead – basic principle of the secularization – and the concept of religion, from the substantivist and functionalist perspectives, this paper addresses the contribution of some authors, classical (Marx, Weber, Durkheim, Freud) and modern (Eliade, Bourdieu, Habermas, Hervieu-Leger, Grace Davie, Heelas), in the important discussion of the (dis) enchantment of the world. Another issue considered is the role of religion in the contemporary society, in the context of a “reenchanted” world, with significant changes in the “market of symbolic goods”, characterized by an individualization/privatization of faith, deterritorialization of the sacred space, religious pluralism (with new and diffused religious practices) and by the phenomenon of Pentecostalism. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-17 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128 10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2017v16n36p128/35099 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 No. 36 (2017); 128-142 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 16 Núm. 36 (2017); 128-142 Política & Sociedade; v. 16 n. 36 (2017); 128-142 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205722832896 |