Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cazella, Ademir Antonio
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Capellesso, Adinor José, Medeiros, Monique, Tecchio, Andréia, Sencébé, Yannick, Búrigo, Fábio Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49
Resumo: In the past two decades an evident dichotomy has been established between policies of a productive nature and those aimed at social assistance for family farms in Brazil. The purpose of this article is to analyze this duality in the main public policies for family farming, and presents a quantitative overview of the results. From a methodological perspective the analysis was based on the number of farmers who benefit from the agrarian reform policies, rural credit, institutional food markets, rural social security and income transfer. The main results of this study indicate that the economic support for the productive activities of Brazilian family farming have been concentrated among the intermediary and well-established farms that are inserted in markets. In parallel, most family farmers are relegated to social assistance programs and not integrated to the working agendas of the main professional organizations in agriculture.
id UFSC-18_514abf2227c3637e01414a37fb8633df
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49347
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and socialPolíticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil: o dilema entre inclusão produtiva e assistência socialIn the past two decades an evident dichotomy has been established between policies of a productive nature and those aimed at social assistance for family farms in Brazil. The purpose of this article is to analyze this duality in the main public policies for family farming, and presents a quantitative overview of the results. From a methodological perspective the analysis was based on the number of farmers who benefit from the agrarian reform policies, rural credit, institutional food markets, rural social security and income transfer. The main results of this study indicate that the economic support for the productive activities of Brazilian family farming have been concentrated among the intermediary and well-established farms that are inserted in markets. In parallel, most family farmers are relegated to social assistance programs and not integrated to the working agendas of the main professional organizations in agriculture.Nas duas últimas décadas, estabeleceu-se uma evidente dicotomia entre as políticas de caráterprodutivo e aquelas destinadas à assistência social das unidades agrícolas familiares no Brasil.Este artigo tem por objetivo analisar esse processo de dualização das principais políticas públicas destinadas à agricultura familiar, elaborando um panorama quantitativo dos seus resultados. Do ponto de vista metodológico, a análise se apoia sobre o número de agricultores beneficiados pelas políticas de reforma agrária, crédito rural, mercados institucionais de alimentos, previdência social rural e transferência de renda. Os principais resultados deste estudo indicam que o apoio econômico para as atividades produtivas da agricultura familiar brasileira tem se concentrado nas camadas intermediárias e consolidadas inseridas nos mercados. Em paralelo, a maior parte dos agricultores familiares é relegada ao assistencialismo social, não integrando as agendas de trabalho das principais organizações profissionais agrícolas.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2016-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p4910.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 49 – 79Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 49 – 79Política & Sociedade; v. 15 (2016); 49 – 792175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49/33797Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCazella, Ademir AntonioCapellesso, Adinor JoséMedeiros, MoniqueTecchio, AndréiaSencébé, YannickBúrigo, Fábio Luiz2020-01-21T12:03:31Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/49347Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2020-01-21T12:03:31Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
Políticas públicas de desenvolvimento rural no Brasil: o dilema entre inclusão produtiva e assistência social
title Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
spellingShingle Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
Cazella, Ademir Antonio
title_short Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
title_full Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
title_fullStr Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
title_full_unstemmed Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
title_sort Rural Development Policy in Brazil: the dilemma between productive inclusion and social
author Cazella, Ademir Antonio
author_facet Cazella, Ademir Antonio
Capellesso, Adinor José
Medeiros, Monique
Tecchio, Andréia
Sencébé, Yannick
Búrigo, Fábio Luiz
author_role author
author2 Capellesso, Adinor José
Medeiros, Monique
Tecchio, Andréia
Sencébé, Yannick
Búrigo, Fábio Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cazella, Ademir Antonio
Capellesso, Adinor José
Medeiros, Monique
Tecchio, Andréia
Sencébé, Yannick
Búrigo, Fábio Luiz
description In the past two decades an evident dichotomy has been established between policies of a productive nature and those aimed at social assistance for family farms in Brazil. The purpose of this article is to analyze this duality in the main public policies for family farming, and presents a quantitative overview of the results. From a methodological perspective the analysis was based on the number of farmers who benefit from the agrarian reform policies, rural credit, institutional food markets, rural social security and income transfer. The main results of this study indicate that the economic support for the productive activities of Brazilian family farming have been concentrated among the intermediary and well-established farms that are inserted in markets. In parallel, most family farmers are relegated to social assistance programs and not integrated to the working agendas of the main professional organizations in agriculture.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49
10.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2016v15nesp1p49/33797
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 49 – 79
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 15 (2016); 49 – 79
Política & Sociedade; v. 15 (2016); 49 – 79
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205395677184