The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gallo, Carlos Artur
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360
Resumo: This work makes a comparative analysis of the judgment of lawsuits that questioned the validity of laws that guarantee the impunity of the sectors involved with the political repression during the National Security dictatorships. For the comparison, two cases were selected for analysis: the “Simón Case”, judged in June 2005 by the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice, and the ADPF 153, judged in April 2010 by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. The decisions are compared and, after, we try to identificate what explains them, verifying their connection with the politics of memory that have been implemented in each context.
id UFSC-18_a3cd71fdac7907e6cbab3856b116c10d
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/57813
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”O passado no banco dos réus: uma análise das decisões das Cortes Supremas argentina e brasileira sobre a validade das “leis de impunidade”This work makes a comparative analysis of the judgment of lawsuits that questioned the validity of laws that guarantee the impunity of the sectors involved with the political repression during the National Security dictatorships. For the comparison, two cases were selected for analysis: the “Simón Case”, judged in June 2005 by the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice, and the ADPF 153, judged in April 2010 by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. The decisions are compared and, after, we try to identificate what explains them, verifying their connection with the politics of memory that have been implemented in each context.Este trabalho faz uma análise comparada de demandas que questionavam a validade de leis que garantem e/ou garantiram a impunidade dos setores envolvidos com a repressão política praticada durante as ditaduras de Segurança Nacional. Foram selecionados dois casos para comparação: o “Caso Simón”, julgado em junho de 2005 pela Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación (CSJN) argentina, e a Arguição por Descumprimento de Preceito Fundamental (ADPF) no 153, julgada em abril de 2010 pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal brasileiro. São comparadas as decisões e busca-se identificar o que as explica, verificando sua conexão com as políticas de memória implementadas em cada contexto.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2019-09-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2019v18n41p36010.5007/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360Política & Sociedade; Vol. 18 No. 41 (2019); 360-395Política & Sociedade; Vol. 18 Núm. 41 (2019); 360-395Política & Sociedade; v. 18 n. 41 (2019); 360-3952175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360/40917Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGallo, Carlos Artur2019-09-23T13:23:03Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/57813Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2019-09-23T13:23:03Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
O passado no banco dos réus: uma análise das decisões das Cortes Supremas argentina e brasileira sobre a validade das “leis de impunidade”
title The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
spellingShingle The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
Gallo, Carlos Artur
title_short The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
title_full The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
title_fullStr The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
title_full_unstemmed The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
title_sort The past in the dock: an analysis of the decisions of the Argentine and Brazilian Supreme Courts on the validity of the “laws of impunity”
author Gallo, Carlos Artur
author_facet Gallo, Carlos Artur
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gallo, Carlos Artur
description This work makes a comparative analysis of the judgment of lawsuits that questioned the validity of laws that guarantee the impunity of the sectors involved with the political repression during the National Security dictatorships. For the comparison, two cases were selected for analysis: the “Simón Case”, judged in June 2005 by the Argentine Supreme Court of Justice, and the ADPF 153, judged in April 2010 by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court. The decisions are compared and, after, we try to identificate what explains them, verifying their connection with the politics of memory that have been implemented in each context.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-09-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360
10.5007/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2019v18n41p360/40917
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 18 No. 41 (2019); 360-395
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 18 Núm. 41 (2019); 360-395
Política & Sociedade; v. 18 n. 41 (2019); 360-395
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205823496192

Registros relacionados