The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Hespanha, António Manuel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Guandalini Junior, Walter
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498
Resumo: In this study, a comparative analysis of the motivations in appeal decisions by the Supreme Courts of Justice in Brazil and Portugal in the second half of the nineteenth century is carried out. It begins by historically contextualizing the doctrinal understanding, in the legal cultures of both countries, about the duty of motivation regarding sentences, showing that in pre-modern societies this duty was considered an accessory instrument, necessary only for the preservation of royal law. Then, the content analysis method was used to evaluate its specificities regarding the characteristics of the appeals (origin, matter, rationale) and of the recurrent parts (gender, social status). Correlations were identified between the applicants’ characteristics, the matters contested and the types of reasoning employed, and in the end it was possible to conclude that the decisions made during this period may be characterized as transitional jurisprudence, midway between the pluralistic reasoning of the old regime and the legalistic foundation typical of modernity.
id UFPR-3_9af3bf4e67aba45609f13cf03d50b392
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/68498
network_acronym_str UFPR-3
network_name_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of JusticeA motivação das decisões sobre revista nas primeiras décadas dos Supremos Tribunais de Justiça no Brasil e em Portugal (1834–1866)Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal.História do DireitoMotivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal.In this study, a comparative analysis of the motivations in appeal decisions by the Supreme Courts of Justice in Brazil and Portugal in the second half of the nineteenth century is carried out. It begins by historically contextualizing the doctrinal understanding, in the legal cultures of both countries, about the duty of motivation regarding sentences, showing that in pre-modern societies this duty was considered an accessory instrument, necessary only for the preservation of royal law. Then, the content analysis method was used to evaluate its specificities regarding the characteristics of the appeals (origin, matter, rationale) and of the recurrent parts (gender, social status). Correlations were identified between the applicants’ characteristics, the matters contested and the types of reasoning employed, and in the end it was possible to conclude that the decisions made during this period may be characterized as transitional jurisprudence, midway between the pluralistic reasoning of the old regime and the legalistic foundation typical of modernity.No presente estudo realiza-se uma análise comparativa das motivações empregadas nas decisões proferidas em recursos de revista pelos Supremos Tribunais de Justiça do Brasil e de Portugal, na segunda metade do século XIX. Para isso se contextualiza historicamente o entendimento doutrinário predominante nas culturas jurídicas dos dois países acerca do dever de motivação das sentenças, verificando-se que na sociedade do antigo regime o dever de motivação era considerado instrumento acessório, necessário somente para a preservação do direito régio. Em seguida, emprega-se o método de análise de conteúdo para avaliar suas especificidades quanto às características dos recursos (origem, matéria, fundamentação) e das partes recorrentes (gênero, estatuto social). Foram identificadas correlações entre as características dos recorrentes, as matérias recorridas e os tipos de fundamentação empregados, e ao final concluiu-se que as decisões proferidas no período indicam tratar-se de uma jurisprudência de transição, a meio caminho entre a fundamentação pluralista do antigo regime e a fundamentação legalista típica da modernidade..Hespanha, António ManuelGuandalini Junior, Walter2020-04-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/6849810.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1.68498Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 65, n. 1 (2020); 185-2242236-72840104-331510.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)instacron:UFPRporhttps://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498/40616Direitos autorais 2020 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-04-28T14:09:54Zoai:revistas.ufpr.br:article/68498Revistahttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs2/index.php/direitoPUBhttp://ojs.c3sl.ufpr.br/ojs/index.php/direito/oai||revistadireito@ufpr.br2236-72840104-3315opendoar:2020-04-28T14:09:54Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
A motivação das decisões sobre revista nas primeiras décadas dos Supremos Tribunais de Justiça no Brasil e em Portugal (1834–1866)
title The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
spellingShingle The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
Hespanha, António Manuel
Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal.
História do Direito
Motivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal.
title_short The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
title_full The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
title_fullStr The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
title_full_unstemmed The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
title_sort The motivation of appeal decisions in the first decades of the Brazilian and Portuguese Supreme Courts of Justice
author Hespanha, António Manuel
author_facet Hespanha, António Manuel
Guandalini Junior, Walter
author_role author
author2 Guandalini Junior, Walter
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hespanha, António Manuel
Guandalini Junior, Walter
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal.
História do Direito
Motivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal.
topic Motivation of decisions. Appeal. Supreme Court of Justice. Brazil. Portugal.
História do Direito
Motivação das decisões. Recurso de revista. Supremo Tribunal de Justiça. Brasil. Portugal.
description In this study, a comparative analysis of the motivations in appeal decisions by the Supreme Courts of Justice in Brazil and Portugal in the second half of the nineteenth century is carried out. It begins by historically contextualizing the doctrinal understanding, in the legal cultures of both countries, about the duty of motivation regarding sentences, showing that in pre-modern societies this duty was considered an accessory instrument, necessary only for the preservation of royal law. Then, the content analysis method was used to evaluate its specificities regarding the characteristics of the appeals (origin, matter, rationale) and of the recurrent parts (gender, social status). Correlations were identified between the applicants’ characteristics, the matters contested and the types of reasoning employed, and in the end it was possible to conclude that the decisions made during this period may be characterized as transitional jurisprudence, midway between the pluralistic reasoning of the old regime and the legalistic foundation typical of modernity.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-28
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498
10.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1.68498
url https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498
identifier_str_mv 10.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1.68498
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufpr.br/direito/article/view/68498/40616
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2020 Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv .
publisher.none.fl_str_mv .
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR; v. 65, n. 1 (2020); 185-224
2236-7284
0104-3315
10.5380/rfdufpr.v65i1
reponame:Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron:UFPR
instname_str Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
instacron_str UFPR
institution UFPR
reponame_str Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
collection Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR (Online) - Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireito@ufpr.br
_version_ 1799766287051653120

Registros relacionados