Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/66962
Resumo: This article analyzes parliamentary discourses on the Brazilian Amazon (2000-2017). The purpose is to examine how the topic was dealt with in the legislative arena, under which perspectives and what arguments are put forward by the deputies. The corpus comprises 2,778 statements,which were categorized into 25 themes, with the aid of NVivo software. The main conclusions show that the value of land as an input for agricultural and livestock production is the predominant argument in the debates, disregarding the international discourse on forestry. The debate isdriven by the agenda of the Executive Branch, especially on the following issues: deforestation, climate, land regularization, preservation areas and indigenous lands. The dominant parliamentary discourse reinforces the anti-ecology thesis of the National Congress, with a clear alignment with the liberal environmental perspective focused on the defense of agribusiness.
id UFSC-18_adb6cff81125ecfad1889c5fbb4f744c
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/66962
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies sayDiscursos parlamentarios sobre la Amazonía: sobre lo que dicen los diputados brasileñosDiscursos parlamentares sobre a Amazônia: sobre o que falam os deputados brasileirosThis article analyzes parliamentary discourses on the Brazilian Amazon (2000-2017). The purpose is to examine how the topic was dealt with in the legislative arena, under which perspectives and what arguments are put forward by the deputies. The corpus comprises 2,778 statements,which were categorized into 25 themes, with the aid of NVivo software. The main conclusions show that the value of land as an input for agricultural and livestock production is the predominant argument in the debates, disregarding the international discourse on forestry. The debate isdriven by the agenda of the Executive Branch, especially on the following issues: deforestation, climate, land regularization, preservation areas and indigenous lands. The dominant parliamentary discourse reinforces the anti-ecology thesis of the National Congress, with a clear alignment with the liberal environmental perspective focused on the defense of agribusiness. El artículo analiza los discursos parlamentarios sobre la Amazonia brasileña (2000-2017). El objetivo es examinar cómo el tema fue tratado en la arena legislativa, bajo qué perspectivas y qué argumentos son accionados por los diputados. El corpus comprende 2.778 pronunciamientos, que fueron categorizados en 25 temas, con la ayuda del software NVivo. Las principales conclusiones muestran que el valor de la tierra como insumo para la producción agrícola y ganadera es elargumento predominante en los debates, desatando el discurso internacional de recorte forestal.El debate es conducido por la agenda del Poder Ejecutivo, especialmente en lo que se refiere a los siguientes temas: deforestación, clima, regularización agraria, áreas de preservación y tierras indígenas. El discurso parlamentario dominante refuerza la tesis de antiecologismo del Congreso Nacional, con un nítido alineamiento a la perspectiva ambientalista liberal volcada hacia la defensa del agronegócio. Analisa os discursos parlamentares sobre a Amazônia brasileira (2000-2017). O objetivo é examinar como o tema foi tratado na arena legislativa, sob quais perspectivas e que argumentos são acionados pelos deputados. O corpus compreende 2.778 pronunciamentos, que foram categorizados em 25 temas para a análise de conteúdo, com o auxílio do software NVivo. As principais conclusões mostram que o valor da terra como insumo para a produção agrícola e pecuária é o argumento predominante nos debates, destoando do discurso internacional de viés florestal. O debate é conduzido pela agenda do Poder Executivo, especialmente no que se refere aos seguintes temas: desmatamento, clima, regularização fundiária, áreas de preservação e terras indígenas. O discurso parlamentar dominante reforça a tese de antiecologismo do Congresso Nacional, com um nítido alinhamento à perspectiva ambientalista liberal voltada para a defesa do agronegócio.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2021-01-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/6696210.5007/2175-7984.2020.e66962Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 46 (2020): Revista Política & Sociedade; 299 – 331Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 46 (2020): Revista Política & Sociedade; 299 – 331Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 46 (2020): Revista Política & Sociedade; 299 – 3312175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/66962/45357Copyright (c) 2021 Política & Sociedadehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBarros, Antonio Teixeira de2021-01-29T03:43:06Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/66962Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2021-01-29T03:43:06Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
Discursos parlamentarios sobre la Amazonía: sobre lo que dicen los diputados brasileños
Discursos parlamentares sobre a Amazônia: sobre o que falam os deputados brasileiros
title Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
spellingShingle Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
title_short Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
title_full Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
title_fullStr Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
title_full_unstemmed Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
title_sort Parliamentary speeches on the Amazon: about what the Brazilian deputies say
author Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
author_facet Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barros, Antonio Teixeira de
description This article analyzes parliamentary discourses on the Brazilian Amazon (2000-2017). The purpose is to examine how the topic was dealt with in the legislative arena, under which perspectives and what arguments are put forward by the deputies. The corpus comprises 2,778 statements,which were categorized into 25 themes, with the aid of NVivo software. The main conclusions show that the value of land as an input for agricultural and livestock production is the predominant argument in the debates, disregarding the international discourse on forestry. The debate isdriven by the agenda of the Executive Branch, especially on the following issues: deforestation, climate, land regularization, preservation areas and indigenous lands. The dominant parliamentary discourse reinforces the anti-ecology thesis of the National Congress, with a clear alignment with the liberal environmental perspective focused on the defense of agribusiness.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-01-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/66962
10.5007/2175-7984.2020.e66962
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/66962
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2020.e66962
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/66962/45357
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Política & Sociedade
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Política & Sociedade
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 No. 46 (2020): Revista Política & Sociedade; 299 – 331
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 19 Núm. 46 (2020): Revista Política & Sociedade; 299 – 331
Política & Sociedade; v. 19 n. 46 (2020): Revista Política & Sociedade; 299 – 331
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435206184206336