Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234
Resumo: In this paper, we seek to revisit the debate between Honneth and Fraser about the concepts of recognition and redistribution under two different perspectives. On the one hand, we will try to verify the echoes and the consequences of this discussion in the works of these two authors after the book-debate of 2003. Thus, if it is true that the central divergences between them remained, it is also a fact that there was an approximation between their ways of conceiving the sources of injustice in contemporary societies. On the other hand, in the spirit of critical theory, that both Honneth and Fraser claim inheritance, we will try to discuss how this debate dialogues with the recent trends of the black movement, showing by this way that this debate is both theoretical and political.
id UFSC-18_d3aff156a7d45fbdcf0ff98777887252
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59445
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versaReconhecimento ou Redistribuição: O que o debate entre Honneth e Fraser diz das lutas sociais e vice-versaIn this paper, we seek to revisit the debate between Honneth and Fraser about the concepts of recognition and redistribution under two different perspectives. On the one hand, we will try to verify the echoes and the consequences of this discussion in the works of these two authors after the book-debate of 2003. Thus, if it is true that the central divergences between them remained, it is also a fact that there was an approximation between their ways of conceiving the sources of injustice in contemporary societies. On the other hand, in the spirit of critical theory, that both Honneth and Fraser claim inheritance, we will try to discuss how this debate dialogues with the recent trends of the black movement, showing by this way that this debate is both theoretical and political.Neste texto, buscamos revisitar o debate entre Honneth e Fraser acerca dos conceitos de reconhecimento e redistribuição sob duas óticas diferentes. Por um lado, faremos isso tentando verificar os ecos e as conseqüências dessa discussão nas obras desses dois autores posteriores ao livro-debate de 2003. Assim, se é verdade que as divergências centrais entre eles se mantiveram, também é fato que houve uma aproximação entre seus modos de conceberem as fontes de injustiças nas sociedades contemporâneas. Por outro lado, no espírito da teoria crítica, que tanto Honneth quanto Fraser reivindicam a herança, tentaremos discutir como esse debate dialoga com as tendências recentes do movimento negro, mostrando assim que esse debate é tanto teórico quanto político.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2018-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p23410.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 234-257Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 234-257Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 234-2572175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234/38990Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa2019-05-22T12:48:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59445Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2019-05-22T12:48:41Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
Reconhecimento ou Redistribuição: O que o debate entre Honneth e Fraser diz das lutas sociais e vice-versa
title Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
spellingShingle Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa
title_short Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
title_full Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
title_fullStr Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
title_full_unstemmed Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
title_sort Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
author Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa
author_facet Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa
description In this paper, we seek to revisit the debate between Honneth and Fraser about the concepts of recognition and redistribution under two different perspectives. On the one hand, we will try to verify the echoes and the consequences of this discussion in the works of these two authors after the book-debate of 2003. Thus, if it is true that the central divergences between them remained, it is also a fact that there was an approximation between their ways of conceiving the sources of injustice in contemporary societies. On the other hand, in the spirit of critical theory, that both Honneth and Fraser claim inheritance, we will try to discuss how this debate dialogues with the recent trends of the black movement, showing by this way that this debate is both theoretical and political.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234
10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234/38990
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 234-257
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 234-257
Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 234-257
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435205844467712