Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Política & Sociedade (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234 |
Resumo: | In this paper, we seek to revisit the debate between Honneth and Fraser about the concepts of recognition and redistribution under two different perspectives. On the one hand, we will try to verify the echoes and the consequences of this discussion in the works of these two authors after the book-debate of 2003. Thus, if it is true that the central divergences between them remained, it is also a fact that there was an approximation between their ways of conceiving the sources of injustice in contemporary societies. On the other hand, in the spirit of critical theory, that both Honneth and Fraser claim inheritance, we will try to discuss how this debate dialogues with the recent trends of the black movement, showing by this way that this debate is both theoretical and political. |
id |
UFSC-18_d3aff156a7d45fbdcf0ff98777887252 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59445 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-18 |
network_name_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versaReconhecimento ou Redistribuição: O que o debate entre Honneth e Fraser diz das lutas sociais e vice-versaIn this paper, we seek to revisit the debate between Honneth and Fraser about the concepts of recognition and redistribution under two different perspectives. On the one hand, we will try to verify the echoes and the consequences of this discussion in the works of these two authors after the book-debate of 2003. Thus, if it is true that the central divergences between them remained, it is also a fact that there was an approximation between their ways of conceiving the sources of injustice in contemporary societies. On the other hand, in the spirit of critical theory, that both Honneth and Fraser claim inheritance, we will try to discuss how this debate dialogues with the recent trends of the black movement, showing by this way that this debate is both theoretical and political.Neste texto, buscamos revisitar o debate entre Honneth e Fraser acerca dos conceitos de reconhecimento e redistribuição sob duas óticas diferentes. Por um lado, faremos isso tentando verificar os ecos e as conseqüências dessa discussão nas obras desses dois autores posteriores ao livro-debate de 2003. Assim, se é verdade que as divergências centrais entre eles se mantiveram, também é fato que houve uma aproximação entre seus modos de conceberem as fontes de injustiças nas sociedades contemporâneas. Por outro lado, no espírito da teoria crítica, que tanto Honneth quanto Fraser reivindicam a herança, tentaremos discutir como esse debate dialoga com as tendências recentes do movimento negro, mostrando assim que esse debate é tanto teórico quanto político.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2018-12-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p23410.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 234-257Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 234-257Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 234-2572175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234/38990Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedadeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa2019-05-22T12:48:41Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/59445Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2019-05-22T12:48:41Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa Reconhecimento ou Redistribuição: O que o debate entre Honneth e Fraser diz das lutas sociais e vice-versa |
title |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa |
spellingShingle |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa |
title_short |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa |
title_full |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa |
title_fullStr |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa |
title_sort |
Recognition or Redistribution: What the debate between Honneth and Fraser says about social struggles and vice versa |
author |
Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa |
author_facet |
Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Neves, Paulo Sérgio da Costa |
description |
In this paper, we seek to revisit the debate between Honneth and Fraser about the concepts of recognition and redistribution under two different perspectives. On the one hand, we will try to verify the echoes and the consequences of this discussion in the works of these two authors after the book-debate of 2003. Thus, if it is true that the central divergences between them remained, it is also a fact that there was an approximation between their ways of conceiving the sources of injustice in contemporary societies. On the other hand, in the spirit of critical theory, that both Honneth and Fraser claim inheritance, we will try to discuss how this debate dialogues with the recent trends of the black movement, showing by this way that this debate is both theoretical and political. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234 10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/2175-7984.2018v17n40p234/38990 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Política & Sociedade |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 No. 40 (2018); 234-257 Política & Sociedade; Vol. 17 Núm. 40 (2018); 234-257 Política & Sociedade; v. 17 n. 40 (2018); 234-257 2175-7984 1677-4140 reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
collection |
Política & Sociedade (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435205844467712 |