Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Magalhães, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Morais Araújo, Mateus, Torok Moreira, Shandor
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Política & Sociedade (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90225
Resumo: This article aims to broaden the debate on the presidential nomination for the position of Justiceof the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) by exploring the mechanisms through whichexpectations of the Justices’ behavior can be anticipated. After analyzing the current discussionon the topic, which highlights influence as one of the main objectives in the selection of STFnominees, we present and discuss the mechanisms by which this influence can be expected bythe president: ideology, loyalty, and gratitude. Based on this, we formulate hypotheses about thejudicial behavior of Justices who have been nominated through one of these mechanisms, at theexpense of the others, and provide anecdotal evidence that presidents nominate Justices withexpectations of loyalty and gratitude. Additionally, we observe that the manifestation of theseelements in the behavior of the Justices, although criticized, is also expected by other politicalactors.
id UFSC-18_d64f19a16279ef75af06a43568ff1746
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/90225
network_acronym_str UFSC-18
network_name_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court"Vou indicar quem toma cerveja comigo": convertendo indicações em influência no STFPresidential nominationSupreme Federal Court (STF)LoyaltyGratitudeJudicial behaviorIndicação presidencialSTFLealdadeGratidãoComportamento judicialThis article aims to broaden the debate on the presidential nomination for the position of Justiceof the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) by exploring the mechanisms through whichexpectations of the Justices’ behavior can be anticipated. After analyzing the current discussionon the topic, which highlights influence as one of the main objectives in the selection of STFnominees, we present and discuss the mechanisms by which this influence can be expected bythe president: ideology, loyalty, and gratitude. Based on this, we formulate hypotheses about thejudicial behavior of Justices who have been nominated through one of these mechanisms, at theexpense of the others, and provide anecdotal evidence that presidents nominate Justices withexpectations of loyalty and gratitude. Additionally, we observe that the manifestation of theseelements in the behavior of the Justices, although criticized, is also expected by other politicalactors.Este artigo tem como objetivo ampliar os horizontes do debate sobre a indicação presidencial para o cargo de Ministro do Supremo Tribunal Federal no Brasil por meio da exploração dos mecanismos pelos quais se pode antecipar expectativas de comportamento dos Ministros. Após uma análise da discussão atual sobre o tema, que destaca a influência como um dos principais objetivos na escolha de indicados ao STF, apresentamos e discutimos os mecanismos pelos quais essa influência pode ser esperada pelo presidente: ideologia, lealdade e gratidão. Com base nisso, formulamos hipóteses sobre o comportamento judicial de Ministros que tenham sido indicados por meio de um desses mecanismos, em detrimento dos outros, e fornecemos evidências anedóticas de que presidentes indicam Ministros com expectativas de lealdade e gratidão. Além disso, observamos que a manifestação desses elementos no comportamento dos Ministros, embora criticada, também é esperada por outros atores políticos.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)2023-08-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/9022510.5007/2175-7984.2022.e90225Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 163-183Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 163-183Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 163-1832175-79841677-4140reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90225/54077http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMagalhães, LucasMorais Araújo, MateusTorok Moreira, Shandor2023-08-23T17:26:58Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/90225Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/oai||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br2175-79841677-4140opendoar:2023-08-23T17:26:58Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
"Vou indicar quem toma cerveja comigo": convertendo indicações em influência no STF
title Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
spellingShingle Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
Magalhães, Lucas
Presidential nomination
Supreme Federal Court (STF)
Loyalty
Gratitude
Judicial behavior
Indicação presidencial
STF
Lealdade
Gratidão
Comportamento judicial
title_short Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
title_full Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
title_fullStr Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
title_full_unstemmed Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
title_sort Nominating only my beer pals: Converting nominations into influence in the Supreme Court
author Magalhães, Lucas
author_facet Magalhães, Lucas
Morais Araújo, Mateus
Torok Moreira, Shandor
author_role author
author2 Morais Araújo, Mateus
Torok Moreira, Shandor
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Magalhães, Lucas
Morais Araújo, Mateus
Torok Moreira, Shandor
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Presidential nomination
Supreme Federal Court (STF)
Loyalty
Gratitude
Judicial behavior
Indicação presidencial
STF
Lealdade
Gratidão
Comportamento judicial
topic Presidential nomination
Supreme Federal Court (STF)
Loyalty
Gratitude
Judicial behavior
Indicação presidencial
STF
Lealdade
Gratidão
Comportamento judicial
description This article aims to broaden the debate on the presidential nomination for the position of Justiceof the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) by exploring the mechanisms through whichexpectations of the Justices’ behavior can be anticipated. After analyzing the current discussionon the topic, which highlights influence as one of the main objectives in the selection of STFnominees, we present and discuss the mechanisms by which this influence can be expected bythe president: ideology, loyalty, and gratitude. Based on this, we formulate hypotheses about thejudicial behavior of Justices who have been nominated through one of these mechanisms, at theexpense of the others, and provide anecdotal evidence that presidents nominate Justices withexpectations of loyalty and gratitude. Additionally, we observe that the manifestation of theseelements in the behavior of the Justices, although criticized, is also expected by other politicalactors.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-08-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90225
10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e90225
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90225
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2175-7984.2022.e90225
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/politica/article/view/90225/54077
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 No. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 163-183
Política & Sociedade; Vol. 21 Núm. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 163-183
Política & Sociedade; v. 21 n. 52 (2022): Novas agendas de pesquisa sobre o Supremo Tribunal Federal; 163-183
2175-7984
1677-4140
reponame:Política & Sociedade (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Política & Sociedade (Online)
collection Política & Sociedade (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Política & Sociedade (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||ernesto.seidl@ufsc.br|| ps@cfh.ufsc.br
_version_ 1799875159242309632

Registros relacionados