Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Andrade, Fábio Lopes de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1016
Resumo: Comparatively analyzes the requirements of the Guidelines for the Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories, a standard developed by the National Council of Archives, and the criteria of the publication Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist for long-term digital preservation. Using the Comparative Method, the following devices present in both criteria models were investigated: Section/Set, Group, and Requirement. Functionally equivalent criteria were sought to group them based on the similarities with which requirements and criteria address preservation actions. It was observed that the requirements of the Guidelines for Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories perform preservation actions similar to those prescribed by the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist criteria. It is concluded that the latter is a viable alternative to assist in the implementation, audit, and certification of archival repositories in the Brazilian context.
id UFSC-20_55b7525de55b0b7891f018cd9885c43f
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.agora.emnuvens.com.br:article/1016
network_acronym_str UFSC-20
network_name_str Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC modelPropuesta de mejora del modelo conceptual para Repositorios Archivísticos Digitales de Confianza (RDC-Arq) para auditoría y certificación con base en la comparación con el modelo de criterios Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC)Proposta de aperfeiçoamento do modelo conceitual para Repositórios Arquivísticos Digitais Confiáveis (RDC-Arq) para auditoria e certificação a partir da comparação com o modelo de critérios Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC)Auditing and Certification of Trusted Repositories: Criteria and Checklist. Long-term digital archival preservation. Audit and certification of trusted digital repositories.Auditoria e certificação de repositórios confiáveis: Critérios e lista de verificação. Preservação arquivística digital no longo prazo. Auditoria e certificação de repositórios digitais confiáveisAuditoría y Certificación de repositorios de confianza: Criterios y lista de verificación. Conservación de archivos digitales a largo plazo. Auditoría y certificación de repositorios digitales confiablesComparatively analyzes the requirements of the Guidelines for the Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories, a standard developed by the National Council of Archives, and the criteria of the publication Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist for long-term digital preservation. Using the Comparative Method, the following devices present in both criteria models were investigated: Section/Set, Group, and Requirement. Functionally equivalent criteria were sought to group them based on the similarities with which requirements and criteria address preservation actions. It was observed that the requirements of the Guidelines for Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories perform preservation actions similar to those prescribed by the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist criteria. It is concluded that the latter is a viable alternative to assist in the implementation, audit, and certification of archival repositories in the Brazilian context.Analiza comparativamente los requisitos de las Directrices para la Implementación de Repositorios de Archivos Digitales de Confianza, una normativa elaborada por el Conselho Nacional de Arquivos, y los criterios de la publicación Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist para la preservación digital a largo plazo. Por medio de la utilización del Método Comparativo, se investigaron los siguientes dispositivos presentes en los modelos de criterios: sección/conjunto, grupo y requisito. Se buscaron criterios funcionalmente equivalentes, para agruparlos en función de las similitudes con las que los requisitos y criterios tratan las acciones de conservación. Se observó que los requisitos de las Directrices para la Implementación de Repositorios de Archivos Digitales de Confianza realizan acciones de preservación similares a las prescritas por los criterios Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist. Se concluye que este último es una alternativa viable para ayudar en la implementación, auditoría y certificación de repositorios archivísticos en el contexto brasileño.Analisa comparativamente os requisitos das Diretrizes para Implementação de Repositórios Arquivísticos Digitais Confiáveis, normativa elaborada pelo Conselho Nacional de Arquivos, e os critérios da publicação Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist para preservação digital no longo prazo. Utilizando o Método Comparativo, investigaram-se os seguintes dispositivos presentes em ambos os modelos de critérios: seção/conjunto, grupo e requisito. Buscaram-se critérios funcionalmente equivalentes, de forma a agrupá-los baseando-se nas semelhanças com que requisitos e critérios tratam as ações de preservação. Observou-se que os requisitos das Diretrizes para Implementação de Repositórios Arquivísticos Digitais Confiáveis desempenham ações de preservação semelhantes às prescritas pelos critérios Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist. Conclui-se que este último é uma alternativa viável para auxiliar na implantação, auditoria e certificação de repositórios arquivísticos no contexto brasileiro.CIN - CED - UFSC2021-08-11info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpalavras chavesapplication/pdfhttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1016ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; Vol. 31 No. 63 (2021); 1-19ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; v. 31 n. 63 (2021); 1-192763-90450103-3557reponame:Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1016/975http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAndrade, Fábio Lopes deChagas, Cintia Aparecida2021-07-01T15:00:25Zoai:ojs.agora.emnuvens.com.br:article/1016Revistahttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/raPUBhttps://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/oairevista.agora@contato.ufsc.br||ursula.blattmann@ufsc.br2763-90450103-3557opendoar:2021-07-01T15:00:25Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
Propuesta de mejora del modelo conceptual para Repositorios Archivísticos Digitales de Confianza (RDC-Arq) para auditoría y certificación con base en la comparación con el modelo de criterios Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC)
Proposta de aperfeiçoamento do modelo conceitual para Repositórios Arquivísticos Digitais Confiáveis (RDC-Arq) para auditoria e certificação a partir da comparação com o modelo de critérios Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC)
title Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
spellingShingle Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
Andrade, Fábio Lopes de
Auditing and Certification of Trusted Repositories: Criteria and Checklist. Long-term digital archival preservation. Audit and certification of trusted digital repositories.
Auditoria e certificação de repositórios confiáveis: Critérios e lista de verificação. Preservação arquivística digital no longo prazo. Auditoria e certificação de repositórios digitais confiáveis
Auditoría y Certificación de repositorios de confianza: Criterios y lista de verificación. Conservación de archivos digitales a largo plazo. Auditoría y certificación de repositorios digitales confiables
title_short Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
title_full Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
title_fullStr Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
title_full_unstemmed Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
title_sort Proposal for improvement of the RDC-Arq model and certification for trusted digital archival repositories based on comparison with the TRAC model
author Andrade, Fábio Lopes de
author_facet Andrade, Fábio Lopes de
Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
author_role author
author2 Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Andrade, Fábio Lopes de
Chagas, Cintia Aparecida
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Auditing and Certification of Trusted Repositories: Criteria and Checklist. Long-term digital archival preservation. Audit and certification of trusted digital repositories.
Auditoria e certificação de repositórios confiáveis: Critérios e lista de verificação. Preservação arquivística digital no longo prazo. Auditoria e certificação de repositórios digitais confiáveis
Auditoría y Certificación de repositorios de confianza: Criterios y lista de verificación. Conservación de archivos digitales a largo plazo. Auditoría y certificación de repositorios digitales confiables
topic Auditing and Certification of Trusted Repositories: Criteria and Checklist. Long-term digital archival preservation. Audit and certification of trusted digital repositories.
Auditoria e certificação de repositórios confiáveis: Critérios e lista de verificação. Preservação arquivística digital no longo prazo. Auditoria e certificação de repositórios digitais confiáveis
Auditoría y Certificación de repositorios de confianza: Criterios y lista de verificación. Conservación de archivos digitales a largo plazo. Auditoría y certificación de repositorios digitales confiables
description Comparatively analyzes the requirements of the Guidelines for the Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories, a standard developed by the National Council of Archives, and the criteria of the publication Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist for long-term digital preservation. Using the Comparative Method, the following devices present in both criteria models were investigated: Section/Set, Group, and Requirement. Functionally equivalent criteria were sought to group them based on the similarities with which requirements and criteria address preservation actions. It was observed that the requirements of the Guidelines for Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories perform preservation actions similar to those prescribed by the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist criteria. It is concluded that the latter is a viable alternative to assist in the implementation, audit, and certification of archival repositories in the Brazilian context.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-08-11
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
palavras chaves
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1016
url https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1016
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1016/975
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CIN - CED - UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CIN - CED - UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; Vol. 31 No. 63 (2021); 1-19
ÁGORA: Arquivologia em debate; v. 31 n. 63 (2021); 1-19
2763-9045
0103-3557
reponame:Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ágora (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revista.agora@contato.ufsc.br||ursula.blattmann@ufsc.br
_version_ 1789435164138405888

Registros relacionados