Repositórios digitais confiáveis: a verificação de compatibilidade entre modelos internacionais de critérios de preservação digital no longo prazo e o RDC-Arq

• Autor(a) principal: Lopes de Andrade , Fabio
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Aparecida Chagas , Cintia
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Ágora (Florianópolis. Online)
• Texto Completo: https://agora.emnuvens.com.br/ra/article/view/1177
• topic: Catalogue of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories NESTOR; Audit and Certification of Trusted Digital Repositories; Trusted Digital Archive Repository (RDC-Arq); Audit and Certification of Reliable Digital Repositories (ACTDR); Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC); Catalogue of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories NESTOR; Auditoria e Certificação de repositórios digitais confiáveis; Repositório Arquivístico Digital Confiável (RDC-Arq); Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories (ACTDR); Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC)

This study analyzes comparatively the criteria of the Catalogue of Criteria for Trusted Digital Repositories (NESTOR), the Trustworthy Repositories Audit & Certification: Criteria and Checklist (TRAC) and Audit and Certification of Trustworthy Digital Repositories (ACTDR), comparing them with the requirements of the Guidelines for the Implementation of Trusted Digital Archival Repositories (RDC-Arq). The similarities and differences were observed regarding the agents of preservation actions, the preservation actions, and the target digital objects of these preservation actions, listed in each requirement, as well as the effectiveness of the audit and certification actions in each of the digital preservation models. The methodology used was a bibliographic review of scientific research on long-term digital preservation, particularly those cited in the RDC-Arq. The requirements and criteria of the models for auditing and certification of digital repositories were compared quantitatively and qualitatively, in search of conceptual similarities and differences. It was concluded that TRAC presents great conceptual similarity to RDC-Arq, as well as that there is already software available to assist in the audit work. The NESTOR Catalog presented criteria of great conceptual amplitude, but that, for the most part, were not similar to the RDC-Arq. ACTDR proved to be more complex and detailed than RDC-Arq, and it is possible to infer that there is relative conceptual similarity between the two.