COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Padova, Amanda Cristina, Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio, Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da, Sagaz, Natália
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Mix Sustentável (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594
Resumo: Sidewalks are essential components of the urban environment, because they allow the locomotion of pedestrians. The inexistence or precariousness of sidewalks compromises the mobility and accessibility of people, being a common problem in different Brazilian cities. This article presents an evaluation of the sustainability tripod from the comparison between different types of sidewalks for construction in a quilombola community in the state of Santa Catarina. After the bibliographical review, the modeling and investigation of four types of sidewalks was performed from digital prototypes, in the following building systems: a) reinforced concrete, b) interlocked floor, c) cementitious floor and d) with civil construction waste and bamboo. After that, the global sustainability assessment was performed for each prototype. It was obtained that the most economically sustainable sidewalk for the budget bases of TCPO (2012) and SINAPI (2022) was the sidewalk with interlocked floor, while the reinforced concrete sidewalk had lower values through the budget provided at DEINFRA-SC (2021). The most socially and environmentally viable sidewalk in this study is the reinforced concrete sidewalk. The contribution of this study is the identification of the most sustainable sidewalk solution for construction in a traditional quilombola community.
id UFSC-22_e786b2131c98b4353dc6ac2e70b649f6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.sites.ufsc.br:article/5594
network_acronym_str UFSC-22
network_name_str Mix Sustentável (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS COMPARAÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE AMBIENTAL, ECONÔMICA E SOCIAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE CALÇADASSustainability; Sidewalks; ComparativeSustentabilidade; Calçadas; ComparativoSidewalks are essential components of the urban environment, because they allow the locomotion of pedestrians. The inexistence or precariousness of sidewalks compromises the mobility and accessibility of people, being a common problem in different Brazilian cities. This article presents an evaluation of the sustainability tripod from the comparison between different types of sidewalks for construction in a quilombola community in the state of Santa Catarina. After the bibliographical review, the modeling and investigation of four types of sidewalks was performed from digital prototypes, in the following building systems: a) reinforced concrete, b) interlocked floor, c) cementitious floor and d) with civil construction waste and bamboo. After that, the global sustainability assessment was performed for each prototype. It was obtained that the most economically sustainable sidewalk for the budget bases of TCPO (2012) and SINAPI (2022) was the sidewalk with interlocked floor, while the reinforced concrete sidewalk had lower values through the budget provided at DEINFRA-SC (2021). The most socially and environmentally viable sidewalk in this study is the reinforced concrete sidewalk. The contribution of this study is the identification of the most sustainable sidewalk solution for construction in a traditional quilombola community. As calçadas são componentes essenciais do meio urbano, pois permitem a locomoção dos pedestres. A inexistência ou a precariedade das calçadas comprometem a mobilidade e acessibilidade das pessoas, sendo um problema comum em diferentes cidades brasileiras. Este artigo apresenta uma avaliação do tripé da sustentabilidade a partir da comparação entre diferentes tipos de calçadas para construção em uma comunidade quilombola no estado de Santa Catarina. Após a revisão bibliográfica, foi realizada a modelagem e investigação de quatro tipos de calçadas a partir de protótipos digitais, nos seguintes sistemas construtivos: a) em concreto armado, b) em piso intertravado, c) em piso cimentício e d) com resíduos de construção civil e bambu. Após, foi realizada a avaliação da sustentabilidade global para cada protótipo. Obteve-se que a calçada mais sustentável economicamente para as bases orçamentárias da TCPO (2012) e da SINAPI (2022) foi a calçada com piso intertravado, enquanto a calçada em concreto armado teve menores valores através do orçamento fornecido na DEINFRA-SC (2021). A calçada mais viável social e ambientalmente neste estudo, é a calçada em concreto armado. A contribuição deste estudo é a identificação da solução de calçada mais sustentável para construção em uma comunidade tradicional quilombola.UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina2022-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/559410.29183/2447-3073.MIX2022.v8.n5.75-91Mix Sustentável; Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-91MIX Sustentável; v. 8 n. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-912447-30732447-0899reponame:Mix Sustentável (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594/4918NacionalNacionalCopyright (c) 2022 Natália Sagazhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Julia Delmondes dePadova, Amanda CristinaDall’ Agnol, JucelioCosta Neto, Luiz Fernandes daSagaz, Natália2022-12-07T14:08:10Zoai:ojs.sites.ufsc.br:article/5594Revistahttp://mixsustentavel.paginas.ufsc.br/apresentacao-2/PUBhttp://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/oailisiane.librelotto@ufsc.br||mixsustentavel@gmail.com2447-30732447-0899opendoar:2022-12-07T14:08:10Mix Sustentável (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
COMPARAÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE AMBIENTAL, ECONÔMICA E SOCIAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE CALÇADAS
title COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
spellingShingle COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de
Sustainability; Sidewalks; Comparative
Sustentabilidade; Calçadas; Comparativo
title_short COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
title_full COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
title_sort COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
author Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de
author_facet Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de
Padova, Amanda Cristina
Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio
Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da
Sagaz, Natália
author_role author
author2 Padova, Amanda Cristina
Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio
Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da
Sagaz, Natália
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de
Padova, Amanda Cristina
Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio
Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da
Sagaz, Natália
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sustainability; Sidewalks; Comparative
Sustentabilidade; Calçadas; Comparativo
topic Sustainability; Sidewalks; Comparative
Sustentabilidade; Calçadas; Comparativo
description Sidewalks are essential components of the urban environment, because they allow the locomotion of pedestrians. The inexistence or precariousness of sidewalks compromises the mobility and accessibility of people, being a common problem in different Brazilian cities. This article presents an evaluation of the sustainability tripod from the comparison between different types of sidewalks for construction in a quilombola community in the state of Santa Catarina. After the bibliographical review, the modeling and investigation of four types of sidewalks was performed from digital prototypes, in the following building systems: a) reinforced concrete, b) interlocked floor, c) cementitious floor and d) with civil construction waste and bamboo. After that, the global sustainability assessment was performed for each prototype. It was obtained that the most economically sustainable sidewalk for the budget bases of TCPO (2012) and SINAPI (2022) was the sidewalk with interlocked floor, while the reinforced concrete sidewalk had lower values through the budget provided at DEINFRA-SC (2021). The most socially and environmentally viable sidewalk in this study is the reinforced concrete sidewalk. The contribution of this study is the identification of the most sustainable sidewalk solution for construction in a traditional quilombola community.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594
10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2022.v8.n5.75-91
url https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594
identifier_str_mv 10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2022.v8.n5.75-91
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594/4918
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Natália Sagaz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Natália Sagaz
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Nacional
Nacional
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Mix Sustentável; Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-91
MIX Sustentável; v. 8 n. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-91
2447-3073
2447-0899
reponame:Mix Sustentável (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Mix Sustentável (Online)
collection Mix Sustentável (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Mix Sustentável (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lisiane.librelotto@ufsc.br||mixsustentavel@gmail.com
_version_ 1798325231209676800