COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Mix Sustentável (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594 |
Resumo: | Sidewalks are essential components of the urban environment, because they allow the locomotion of pedestrians. The inexistence or precariousness of sidewalks compromises the mobility and accessibility of people, being a common problem in different Brazilian cities. This article presents an evaluation of the sustainability tripod from the comparison between different types of sidewalks for construction in a quilombola community in the state of Santa Catarina. After the bibliographical review, the modeling and investigation of four types of sidewalks was performed from digital prototypes, in the following building systems: a) reinforced concrete, b) interlocked floor, c) cementitious floor and d) with civil construction waste and bamboo. After that, the global sustainability assessment was performed for each prototype. It was obtained that the most economically sustainable sidewalk for the budget bases of TCPO (2012) and SINAPI (2022) was the sidewalk with interlocked floor, while the reinforced concrete sidewalk had lower values through the budget provided at DEINFRA-SC (2021). The most socially and environmentally viable sidewalk in this study is the reinforced concrete sidewalk. The contribution of this study is the identification of the most sustainable sidewalk solution for construction in a traditional quilombola community. |
id |
UFSC-22_e786b2131c98b4353dc6ac2e70b649f6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.sites.ufsc.br:article/5594 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-22 |
network_name_str |
Mix Sustentável (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS COMPARAÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE AMBIENTAL, ECONÔMICA E SOCIAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE CALÇADASSustainability; Sidewalks; ComparativeSustentabilidade; Calçadas; ComparativoSidewalks are essential components of the urban environment, because they allow the locomotion of pedestrians. The inexistence or precariousness of sidewalks compromises the mobility and accessibility of people, being a common problem in different Brazilian cities. This article presents an evaluation of the sustainability tripod from the comparison between different types of sidewalks for construction in a quilombola community in the state of Santa Catarina. After the bibliographical review, the modeling and investigation of four types of sidewalks was performed from digital prototypes, in the following building systems: a) reinforced concrete, b) interlocked floor, c) cementitious floor and d) with civil construction waste and bamboo. After that, the global sustainability assessment was performed for each prototype. It was obtained that the most economically sustainable sidewalk for the budget bases of TCPO (2012) and SINAPI (2022) was the sidewalk with interlocked floor, while the reinforced concrete sidewalk had lower values through the budget provided at DEINFRA-SC (2021). The most socially and environmentally viable sidewalk in this study is the reinforced concrete sidewalk. The contribution of this study is the identification of the most sustainable sidewalk solution for construction in a traditional quilombola community. As calçadas são componentes essenciais do meio urbano, pois permitem a locomoção dos pedestres. A inexistência ou a precariedade das calçadas comprometem a mobilidade e acessibilidade das pessoas, sendo um problema comum em diferentes cidades brasileiras. Este artigo apresenta uma avaliação do tripé da sustentabilidade a partir da comparação entre diferentes tipos de calçadas para construção em uma comunidade quilombola no estado de Santa Catarina. Após a revisão bibliográfica, foi realizada a modelagem e investigação de quatro tipos de calçadas a partir de protótipos digitais, nos seguintes sistemas construtivos: a) em concreto armado, b) em piso intertravado, c) em piso cimentício e d) com resíduos de construção civil e bambu. Após, foi realizada a avaliação da sustentabilidade global para cada protótipo. Obteve-se que a calçada mais sustentável economicamente para as bases orçamentárias da TCPO (2012) e da SINAPI (2022) foi a calçada com piso intertravado, enquanto a calçada em concreto armado teve menores valores através do orçamento fornecido na DEINFRA-SC (2021). A calçada mais viável social e ambientalmente neste estudo, é a calçada em concreto armado. A contribuição deste estudo é a identificação da solução de calçada mais sustentável para construção em uma comunidade tradicional quilombola.UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina2022-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/559410.29183/2447-3073.MIX2022.v8.n5.75-91Mix Sustentável; Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-91MIX Sustentável; v. 8 n. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-912447-30732447-0899reponame:Mix Sustentável (Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594/4918NacionalNacionalCopyright (c) 2022 Natália Sagazhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira, Julia Delmondes dePadova, Amanda CristinaDall’ Agnol, JucelioCosta Neto, Luiz Fernandes daSagaz, Natália2022-12-07T14:08:10Zoai:ojs.sites.ufsc.br:article/5594Revistahttp://mixsustentavel.paginas.ufsc.br/apresentacao-2/PUBhttp://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/oailisiane.librelotto@ufsc.br||mixsustentavel@gmail.com2447-30732447-0899opendoar:2022-12-07T14:08:10Mix Sustentável (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS COMPARAÇÃO DA SUSTENTABILIDADE AMBIENTAL, ECONÔMICA E SOCIAL PARA EXECUÇÃO DE CALÇADAS |
title |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS |
spellingShingle |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de Sustainability; Sidewalks; Comparative Sustentabilidade; Calçadas; Comparativo |
title_short |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS |
title_full |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS |
title_fullStr |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS |
title_full_unstemmed |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS |
title_sort |
COMPARISON OF ENVIRONMENTAL, ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY FOR THE EXECUTION OF SIDEWALKS |
author |
Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de |
author_facet |
Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de Padova, Amanda Cristina Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da Sagaz, Natália |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Padova, Amanda Cristina Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da Sagaz, Natália |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira, Julia Delmondes de Padova, Amanda Cristina Dall’ Agnol, Jucelio Costa Neto, Luiz Fernandes da Sagaz, Natália |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Sustainability; Sidewalks; Comparative Sustentabilidade; Calçadas; Comparativo |
topic |
Sustainability; Sidewalks; Comparative Sustentabilidade; Calçadas; Comparativo |
description |
Sidewalks are essential components of the urban environment, because they allow the locomotion of pedestrians. The inexistence or precariousness of sidewalks compromises the mobility and accessibility of people, being a common problem in different Brazilian cities. This article presents an evaluation of the sustainability tripod from the comparison between different types of sidewalks for construction in a quilombola community in the state of Santa Catarina. After the bibliographical review, the modeling and investigation of four types of sidewalks was performed from digital prototypes, in the following building systems: a) reinforced concrete, b) interlocked floor, c) cementitious floor and d) with civil construction waste and bamboo. After that, the global sustainability assessment was performed for each prototype. It was obtained that the most economically sustainable sidewalk for the budget bases of TCPO (2012) and SINAPI (2022) was the sidewalk with interlocked floor, while the reinforced concrete sidewalk had lower values through the budget provided at DEINFRA-SC (2021). The most socially and environmentally viable sidewalk in this study is the reinforced concrete sidewalk. The contribution of this study is the identification of the most sustainable sidewalk solution for construction in a traditional quilombola community. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594 10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2022.v8.n5.75-91 |
url |
https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29183/2447-3073.MIX2022.v8.n5.75-91 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.sites.ufsc.br/index.php/mixsustentavel/article/view/5594/4918 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Natália Sagaz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Natália Sagaz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
Nacional Nacional |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFSC - Federal University of Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Mix Sustentável; Vol. 8 No. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-91 MIX Sustentável; v. 8 n. 5 (2022): Mix Sustentável (edição especial - X ENSUS); 75-91 2447-3073 2447-0899 reponame:Mix Sustentável (Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Mix Sustentável (Online) |
collection |
Mix Sustentável (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Mix Sustentável (Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lisiane.librelotto@ufsc.br||mixsustentavel@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798325231209676800 |