Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/75663 |
Resumo: | The relevance of the discussion on Nature of Science in Science Education has been pointed out in recent years and there have been several approaches that take the construction of scientific knowledge as an educational object. In this article, we bring contributions to the debate around that approach that became known as consensual aspects. We do this through the Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, pointing out that the contradictory and contentious character is what drives human activity, and, consequently, the production of scientific knowledge. In this sense, an exaggerated emphasis on consensus, and not on the contradictory, would do little to promote, in Science Education, a critical analysis of science and the society in which it is inserted. |
id |
UFSC-23_22b313365b73097467697e9693757d5d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/75663 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-23 |
network_name_str |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theoryContribuições para o debate em torno dos aspectos consensuais em natureza da ciência a partir da teoria da atividade cultural-históricaThe relevance of the discussion on Nature of Science in Science Education has been pointed out in recent years and there have been several approaches that take the construction of scientific knowledge as an educational object. In this article, we bring contributions to the debate around that approach that became known as consensual aspects. We do this through the Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, pointing out that the contradictory and contentious character is what drives human activity, and, consequently, the production of scientific knowledge. In this sense, an exaggerated emphasis on consensus, and not on the contradictory, would do little to promote, in Science Education, a critical analysis of science and the society in which it is inserted.A relevância da discussão sobre Natureza da Ciência na Educação em Ciências tem sido apontada nos últimos anos e diversas têm sido as abordagens que tomam a construção do conhecimento científico como objeto educacional. No presente artigo trazemos contribuições para o debate em torno daquela abordagem que ficou conhecida como a dos aspectos consensuais. Fazemos por meio da Teoria da Atividade Cultural-Histórica, apontando, que o caráter contraditório e contencioso é o que move a atividade humana, e, consequentemente, a produção do conhecimento científico. Nesse sentido, uma exagerada ênfase nos consensos, e não no contraditório, pouco contribuiria para promover, na Educação em Ciências, uma análise crítica da ciência e da sociedade na qual está inserida.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2021-11-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/7566310.5007/1982-5153.2021.e75663Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 14 n. 2 (2021); 225-2431982-5153reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/75663/47539Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGarcia, João OtavioCamillo, Juliano2021-11-16T15:23:05Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/75663Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/oai1982-51531982-5153opendoar:2021-11-16T15:23:05Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory Contribuições para o debate em torno dos aspectos consensuais em natureza da ciência a partir da teoria da atividade cultural-histórica |
title |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory |
spellingShingle |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory Garcia, João Otavio |
title_short |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory |
title_full |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory |
title_fullStr |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory |
title_sort |
Contributions to the nature of science consensus view approach from cultural-historical activity theory |
author |
Garcia, João Otavio |
author_facet |
Garcia, João Otavio Camillo, Juliano |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Camillo, Juliano |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Garcia, João Otavio Camillo, Juliano |
description |
The relevance of the discussion on Nature of Science in Science Education has been pointed out in recent years and there have been several approaches that take the construction of scientific knowledge as an educational object. In this article, we bring contributions to the debate around that approach that became known as consensual aspects. We do this through the Cultural-Historical Activity Theory, pointing out that the contradictory and contentious character is what drives human activity, and, consequently, the production of scientific knowledge. In this sense, an exaggerated emphasis on consensus, and not on the contradictory, would do little to promote, in Science Education, a critical analysis of science and the society in which it is inserted. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/75663 10.5007/1982-5153.2021.e75663 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/75663 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1982-5153.2021.e75663 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/75663/47539 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 14 n. 2 (2021); 225-243 1982-5153 reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
collection |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808843265541144576 |