Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Raicik, Anabel Cardoso
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Angotti, José André Peres
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Alexandria (Florianópolis)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331
Resumo: The study of scientific controversies is a complex theme because of its contextual peculiarities. Philosophers, sociologists, historians of science, and researchers in science have shown that their analysis can present diverse perspectives that encompass the appreciation of their genesis and progress as well as considerations about its and. In this sense, the present article discusses Kuhn’s conceptions of values in the theorical choice that can contribute to the understanding of the termination process warm debates in science. Moreover, in the case of a theoretical article approaches to McMullin's classification involving resolution, closure and abandonment of controversies in Science. Indeed, it introduces implications for the teaching of sciences aimed, above all, to break with the limited view that disputes are resolved through experiments.
id UFSC-23_313e243a6d8566d709776a02e4b56266
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55722
network_acronym_str UFSC-23
network_name_str Alexandria (Florianópolis)
repository_id_str
spelling Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptionsA escolha teórica em controvérsias científicas: valores e seus juízos à luz de concepções kuhnianasThe study of scientific controversies is a complex theme because of its contextual peculiarities. Philosophers, sociologists, historians of science, and researchers in science have shown that their analysis can present diverse perspectives that encompass the appreciation of their genesis and progress as well as considerations about its and. In this sense, the present article discusses Kuhn’s conceptions of values in the theorical choice that can contribute to the understanding of the termination process warm debates in science. Moreover, in the case of a theoretical article approaches to McMullin's classification involving resolution, closure and abandonment of controversies in Science. Indeed, it introduces implications for the teaching of sciences aimed, above all, to break with the limited view that disputes are resolved through experiments.O estudo de controvérsias científicas é um tema complexo por suas peculiaridades contextuais. Filósofos, sociólogos, historiadores da ciência e pesquisadores em ensino de ciências têm mostrado que a sua análise pode apresentar perspectivas diversas que abrangem tanto a apreciação de sua gênese e progresso como ponderações acerca de seu término. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo discute concepções de Kuhn sobre valores na escolha teórica que podem contribuir para o entendimento do processo de término de debates calorosos na ciência. Além disso, tratando-se de um artigo teórico, aborda uma classificação de McMullin envolvendo resolução, encerramento e abandono de controvérsias na ciência. Com efeito, apresenta implicações para o ensino de ciências visando, sobretudo, romper com a visão limitada de que exclusivamente por meio de experimentações as querelas são resolvidas.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2019-05-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2019v12n1p33110.5007/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 12 n. 1 (2019); 331-3491982-5153reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331/40034Copyright (c) 2019 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRaicik, Anabel CardosoAngotti, José André Peres2019-05-27T19:13:40Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/55722Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/oai1982-51531982-5153opendoar:2019-05-27T19:13:40Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
A escolha teórica em controvérsias científicas: valores e seus juízos à luz de concepções kuhnianas
title Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
spellingShingle Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
Raicik, Anabel Cardoso
title_short Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
title_full Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
title_fullStr Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
title_sort Theoretical choice in scientific controversies: values and their judgments in the light of kuhnian conceptions
author Raicik, Anabel Cardoso
author_facet Raicik, Anabel Cardoso
Angotti, José André Peres
author_role author
author2 Angotti, José André Peres
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Raicik, Anabel Cardoso
Angotti, José André Peres
description The study of scientific controversies is a complex theme because of its contextual peculiarities. Philosophers, sociologists, historians of science, and researchers in science have shown that their analysis can present diverse perspectives that encompass the appreciation of their genesis and progress as well as considerations about its and. In this sense, the present article discusses Kuhn’s conceptions of values in the theorical choice that can contribute to the understanding of the termination process warm debates in science. Moreover, in the case of a theoretical article approaches to McMullin's classification involving resolution, closure and abandonment of controversies in Science. Indeed, it introduces implications for the teaching of sciences aimed, above all, to break with the limited view that disputes are resolved through experiments.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-05-27
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331
10.5007/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/alexandria/article/view/1982-5153.2019v12n1p331/40034
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Alexandria: Revista de Educação em Ciência e Tecnologia; v. 12 n. 1 (2019); 331-349
1982-5153
reponame:Alexandria (Florianópolis)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Alexandria (Florianópolis)
collection Alexandria (Florianópolis)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Alexandria (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808843265402732544

Registros relacionados