Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Borba, Vildeane da Rocha
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Caregnato, Sônia Elisa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Encontros Bibli
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797
Resumo: Objective: reports the experience of using altmetric data aggregators Altmetric.com and Webometric Analyst, in a study on the presence of articles from Brazilian scientific journals on Information Science on social media platforms. Methods: the study was characterized as descriptive, of qualitative and quantitative nature, which analyzed the aggregators Altmetric.com and Webometric Analyst. The corpus used to test them consisted of 13 Brazilian journals in Information Science, encompassing 2,724 scientific articles published in the period from 2011 to 2018. Result: from the use of the two aggregators to collect altmetric data about articles from Brazilian journals in Information Science, it was primarily verified that different methodologies and tools generate different results, with discrepancies and specific similarities. It was also noticed that the DOI numbers of some articles were incorrect, that is, the link of these DOIs pointed to an error page in CrossRef, assuming that was the reason for the small number of positive results in the Altmetric.com via API. Although the Webometric Analyst has shown greater coverage of altmetric data for articles from Brazilian journals in Information Science, possibly due to the search strategy used, in this case author, title and year, some inconsistencies were noticed in Mendeley, such as an article with different versions or with different publication dates, showing divergent counts of readers for the same article. Conclusions: it is considered that the tools used for generating altmetric data should be understood as facilitators of data collection on social media platforms, however one must be aware of the scope and limitations of each of these tools, as well as of the collection chosen for testing and capture. As the nature of the platforms is uneven, they can be employed as to complement one another.
id UFSC-29_52fefcb2cbcba457ed2d964589476578
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78797
network_acronym_str UFSC-29
network_name_str Encontros Bibli
repository_id_str
spelling Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analystAgregadores de dados altmétricos: analisando o altmetric.com e o webometric analystAltmetricAltmetric data aggregatorsAltmetric.com APIWebometric AnalystAltmetriaAgregadores de dados altmétricosPI do Altmetric.comWebometric AnalystObjective: reports the experience of using altmetric data aggregators Altmetric.com and Webometric Analyst, in a study on the presence of articles from Brazilian scientific journals on Information Science on social media platforms. Methods: the study was characterized as descriptive, of qualitative and quantitative nature, which analyzed the aggregators Altmetric.com and Webometric Analyst. The corpus used to test them consisted of 13 Brazilian journals in Information Science, encompassing 2,724 scientific articles published in the period from 2011 to 2018. Result: from the use of the two aggregators to collect altmetric data about articles from Brazilian journals in Information Science, it was primarily verified that different methodologies and tools generate different results, with discrepancies and specific similarities. It was also noticed that the DOI numbers of some articles were incorrect, that is, the link of these DOIs pointed to an error page in CrossRef, assuming that was the reason for the small number of positive results in the Altmetric.com via API. Although the Webometric Analyst has shown greater coverage of altmetric data for articles from Brazilian journals in Information Science, possibly due to the search strategy used, in this case author, title and year, some inconsistencies were noticed in Mendeley, such as an article with different versions or with different publication dates, showing divergent counts of readers for the same article. Conclusions: it is considered that the tools used for generating altmetric data should be understood as facilitators of data collection on social media platforms, however one must be aware of the scope and limitations of each of these tools, as well as of the collection chosen for testing and capture. As the nature of the platforms is uneven, they can be employed as to complement one another.Objetivo: relata a experiência de utilização dos agregadores de dados altmétricos Altmetric.com e do Webometric Analyst, em um estudo sobre a presença dos artigos de revistas científicas brasileiras da Ciência da Informação nas plataformas de mídias sociais. Método: o estudo foi caracterizado como descritivo, de natureza qualiquantitativa, cujo objeto de análise foram os agregadores Altmetric.com e Webometric Analyst. O corpus utilizado para testá-los constituiu-se de 13 periódicos brasileiros da área da Ciência da Informação, englobando 2.724 artigos científicos publicados no período de 2011 a 2018. Resultado: a partir da utilização desses agregadores para coletar dados altmétricos sobre artigos de periódicos brasileiros em Ciência da Informação, pode-se constatar primariamente que distintas metodologias e ferramentas geram diferentes resultados, com discrepâncias e semelhanças pontuais. Percebeu-se também que os números de DOIs de alguns artigos de periódicos estavam incorretos, isto é, o link destes DOIs remetia a uma página de erro na CrossRef, presumindo-se que a baixa quantidade de resultados positivos de dados altmétricos no Altmetric.com via API deve-se a isso. Embora o Webometric Analyst tenha apresentado uma maior cobertura de dados altmétricos para os artigos de periódicos brasileiros em Ciência da Informação, possivelmente pela forma de busca de dados utilizada, neste caso autor, título e ano, foram percebidas algumas inconsistências no Mendeley, como um artigo com diferentes versões ou com datas de publicação distintas, mostrando divergentes contagens de leitores para um mesmo artigo. Conclusões: considera-se que as ferramentas utilizadas para gerar dados altmétricos devem ser entendidas como facilitadores da coleta de dados em plataformas de mídias sociais, porém deve-se estar atento à abrangência e limitação de cada uma dessas ferramentas, assim como da coleção escolhida para teste e captura de dados. Como a natureza das plataformas é desigual, elas podem ser utilizadas de modo complementar em estudos altmétricos.  Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC2021-10-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/7879710.5007/1518-2924.2021.78797Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 No. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-19Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 Núm. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-19Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 n. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-191518-2924reponame:Encontros Bibliinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797/47421https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797/54036Copyright (c) 2021 Vildeane da Rocha Borba, Sônia Elisa Caregnatohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBorba, Vildeane da RochaCaregnato, Sônia Elisa 2023-08-21T12:42:42Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78797Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/oaiencontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1518-29241518-2924opendoar:2023-08-21T12:42:42Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
Agregadores de dados altmétricos: analisando o altmetric.com e o webometric analyst
title Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
spellingShingle Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
Borba, Vildeane da Rocha
Altmetric
Altmetric data aggregators
Altmetric.com API
Webometric Analyst
Altmetria
Agregadores de dados altmétricos
PI do Altmetric.com
Webometric Analyst
title_short Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
title_full Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
title_fullStr Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
title_full_unstemmed Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
title_sort Altmetric data aggregators: analyzing altmetric.com and webometric analyst
author Borba, Vildeane da Rocha
author_facet Borba, Vildeane da Rocha
Caregnato, Sônia Elisa
author_role author
author2 Caregnato, Sônia Elisa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Borba, Vildeane da Rocha
Caregnato, Sônia Elisa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Altmetric
Altmetric data aggregators
Altmetric.com API
Webometric Analyst
Altmetria
Agregadores de dados altmétricos
PI do Altmetric.com
Webometric Analyst
topic Altmetric
Altmetric data aggregators
Altmetric.com API
Webometric Analyst
Altmetria
Agregadores de dados altmétricos
PI do Altmetric.com
Webometric Analyst
description Objective: reports the experience of using altmetric data aggregators Altmetric.com and Webometric Analyst, in a study on the presence of articles from Brazilian scientific journals on Information Science on social media platforms. Methods: the study was characterized as descriptive, of qualitative and quantitative nature, which analyzed the aggregators Altmetric.com and Webometric Analyst. The corpus used to test them consisted of 13 Brazilian journals in Information Science, encompassing 2,724 scientific articles published in the period from 2011 to 2018. Result: from the use of the two aggregators to collect altmetric data about articles from Brazilian journals in Information Science, it was primarily verified that different methodologies and tools generate different results, with discrepancies and specific similarities. It was also noticed that the DOI numbers of some articles were incorrect, that is, the link of these DOIs pointed to an error page in CrossRef, assuming that was the reason for the small number of positive results in the Altmetric.com via API. Although the Webometric Analyst has shown greater coverage of altmetric data for articles from Brazilian journals in Information Science, possibly due to the search strategy used, in this case author, title and year, some inconsistencies were noticed in Mendeley, such as an article with different versions or with different publication dates, showing divergent counts of readers for the same article. Conclusions: it is considered that the tools used for generating altmetric data should be understood as facilitators of data collection on social media platforms, however one must be aware of the scope and limitations of each of these tools, as well as of the collection chosen for testing and capture. As the nature of the platforms is uneven, they can be employed as to complement one another.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797
10.5007/1518-2924.2021.78797
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1518-2924.2021.78797
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797/47421
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78797/54036
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Vildeane da Rocha Borba, Sônia Elisa Caregnato
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Vildeane da Rocha Borba, Sônia Elisa Caregnato
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 No. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-19
Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 Núm. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-19
Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 n. Especial (2021): O compartilhamento de dados e a pesquisa bibliométrica e cientométrica; 1-19
1518-2924
reponame:Encontros Bibli
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Encontros Bibli
collection Encontros Bibli
repository.name.fl_str_mv Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1797067779030908928