Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira, Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de, Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros, Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos, Cendón, Beatriz Valadares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Encontros Bibli
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678
Resumo: Objective: this article aims to present a tool for critical analysis of a specific type of research report: theses and dissertations. Methods: this instrument was developed to carry out an activity in the Scientific Methodology course of the Postgraduate Program in Management & Knowledge Organization at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), in the first semester of 2019. The purpose of the instrument was to analyze the adherence of a scientific research to the recommendations of Creswell (2014) and other works on scientific methodology. It consists of 9 items, subdivided into 67 criteria, in the form of questions. For evaluation, each criterion is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with a value of 1 corresponding to the less precise presentation of the criterion and a value of 5 to the more accurate presentation. The option “Not applicable (N / A)” was inserted in the instrument for those criteria in which the evaluator believes that it does not match the structural proposal of the research. Results: After describing the basis for its development, the instrument is presented. Next it was tested through the evaluation of a doctoral dissertation and a master thesis. Conclusions: Results show on that the instrument was adequate for the purpose proposed, that is, the evaluation of research reports of theses and dissertations, with the recommendation that the style and specificity of each investigation must be taken into account.
id UFSC-29_7e4da1f75d9a4f6760f6bce25d5a26ff
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78678
network_acronym_str UFSC-29
network_name_str Encontros Bibli
repository_id_str
spelling Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: Instrumento para análise crítica de relatórios de pesquisas: teses e dissertações: Comunicação científicaMetodologia científicaTrabalhos acadêmicosScientific communicationScientific methodologyAcademic worksObjective: this article aims to present a tool for critical analysis of a specific type of research report: theses and dissertations. Methods: this instrument was developed to carry out an activity in the Scientific Methodology course of the Postgraduate Program in Management & Knowledge Organization at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), in the first semester of 2019. The purpose of the instrument was to analyze the adherence of a scientific research to the recommendations of Creswell (2014) and other works on scientific methodology. It consists of 9 items, subdivided into 67 criteria, in the form of questions. For evaluation, each criterion is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with a value of 1 corresponding to the less precise presentation of the criterion and a value of 5 to the more accurate presentation. The option “Not applicable (N / A)” was inserted in the instrument for those criteria in which the evaluator believes that it does not match the structural proposal of the research. Results: After describing the basis for its development, the instrument is presented. Next it was tested through the evaluation of a doctoral dissertation and a master thesis. Conclusions: Results show on that the instrument was adequate for the purpose proposed, that is, the evaluation of research reports of theses and dissertations, with the recommendation that the style and specificity of each investigation must be taken into account.Objetivo: Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar um instrumento de análise crítica de um tipo específico de relatórios de pesquisa: teses e dissertações. Metodologia: Trata-se de um instrumento desenvolvido para realização de uma atividade da disciplina Metodologia de Pesquisa do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão & Organização do Conhecimento da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), no primeiro semestre de 2019. A finalidade do instrumento foi analisar a aderência de uma pesquisa científica às recomendações de Creswell (2014) e outras obras que abordam a metodologia científica. É composto por nove itens, subdivididos em 67 critérios, em formato de perguntas. Para avaliação, em cada critério é necessária uma marcação em uma escala do tipo Likert, de 5 pontos, ou seja, o valor 1 é correspondente à apresentação mais fraca do critério e o valor 5, à mais forte. Como recurso alternativo, foi inserida no instrumento a opção “Não se aplica (N/A)” para aqueles critérios em que o avaliador entende que não condiz com a proposta estrutural da pesquisa. Resultados: Após o relato das bases para o desenvolvimento e exposição do instrumento, o artigo apresenta seu teste por meio da sua aplicação na avaliação de uma tese e de uma dissertação. Conclusões: Conclui-se que o instrumento se mostrou adequado para a finalidade proposta, avaliação de relatórios de pesquisa de teses e dissertações, com a recomendação de que o estilo do autor e a especificidade de cada investigação devam ser levados em consideração.Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC2021-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/7867810.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78678Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 years giving voice to Science"; 01-25Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 años dando voz a la ciencia"; 01-25Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 (2021): A Encontros Bibli "25 anos dando voz à Ciência"; 01-251518-2924reponame:Encontros Bibliinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45817https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/53824https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45852https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45776Copyright (c) 2021 Nivaldo Calixto Ribeiro, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Santos, Gracilene Maria de Carvalho, Rômulo de Barros Teixeira, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculan, Beatriz Valadares Cendónhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Nivaldo CalixtoSantos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Cendón, Beatriz Valadares 2023-07-19T11:02:04Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78678Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/oaiencontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1518-29241518-2924opendoar:2023-07-19T11:02:04Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
Instrumento para análise crítica de relatórios de pesquisas: teses e dissertações:
title Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
spellingShingle Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Comunicação científica
Metodologia científica
Trabalhos acadêmicos
Scientific communication
Scientific methodology
Academic works
title_short Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
title_full Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
title_fullStr Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
title_full_unstemmed Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
title_sort Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
author Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
author_facet Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira
Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de
Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros
Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
Cendón, Beatriz Valadares
author_role author
author2 Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira
Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de
Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros
Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
Cendón, Beatriz Valadares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto
Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira
Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de
Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros
Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos
Cendón, Beatriz Valadares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Comunicação científica
Metodologia científica
Trabalhos acadêmicos
Scientific communication
Scientific methodology
Academic works
topic Comunicação científica
Metodologia científica
Trabalhos acadêmicos
Scientific communication
Scientific methodology
Academic works
description Objective: this article aims to present a tool for critical analysis of a specific type of research report: theses and dissertations. Methods: this instrument was developed to carry out an activity in the Scientific Methodology course of the Postgraduate Program in Management & Knowledge Organization at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), in the first semester of 2019. The purpose of the instrument was to analyze the adherence of a scientific research to the recommendations of Creswell (2014) and other works on scientific methodology. It consists of 9 items, subdivided into 67 criteria, in the form of questions. For evaluation, each criterion is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with a value of 1 corresponding to the less precise presentation of the criterion and a value of 5 to the more accurate presentation. The option “Not applicable (N / A)” was inserted in the instrument for those criteria in which the evaluator believes that it does not match the structural proposal of the research. Results: After describing the basis for its development, the instrument is presented. Next it was tested through the evaluation of a doctoral dissertation and a master thesis. Conclusions: Results show on that the instrument was adequate for the purpose proposed, that is, the evaluation of research reports of theses and dissertations, with the recommendation that the style and specificity of each investigation must be taken into account.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678
10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78678
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78678
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45817
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/53824
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45852
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45776
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/xml
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 years giving voice to Science"; 01-25
Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 años dando voz a la ciencia"; 01-25
Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 (2021): A Encontros Bibli "25 anos dando voz à Ciência"; 01-25
1518-2924
reponame:Encontros Bibli
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Encontros Bibli
collection Encontros Bibli
repository.name.fl_str_mv Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br
_version_ 1797067779017277440