Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations:
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Encontros Bibli |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678 |
Resumo: | Objective: this article aims to present a tool for critical analysis of a specific type of research report: theses and dissertations. Methods: this instrument was developed to carry out an activity in the Scientific Methodology course of the Postgraduate Program in Management & Knowledge Organization at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), in the first semester of 2019. The purpose of the instrument was to analyze the adherence of a scientific research to the recommendations of Creswell (2014) and other works on scientific methodology. It consists of 9 items, subdivided into 67 criteria, in the form of questions. For evaluation, each criterion is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with a value of 1 corresponding to the less precise presentation of the criterion and a value of 5 to the more accurate presentation. The option “Not applicable (N / A)” was inserted in the instrument for those criteria in which the evaluator believes that it does not match the structural proposal of the research. Results: After describing the basis for its development, the instrument is presented. Next it was tested through the evaluation of a doctoral dissertation and a master thesis. Conclusions: Results show on that the instrument was adequate for the purpose proposed, that is, the evaluation of research reports of theses and dissertations, with the recommendation that the style and specificity of each investigation must be taken into account. |
id |
UFSC-29_7e4da1f75d9a4f6760f6bce25d5a26ff |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78678 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-29 |
network_name_str |
Encontros Bibli |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: Instrumento para análise crítica de relatórios de pesquisas: teses e dissertações: Comunicação científicaMetodologia científicaTrabalhos acadêmicosScientific communicationScientific methodologyAcademic worksObjective: this article aims to present a tool for critical analysis of a specific type of research report: theses and dissertations. Methods: this instrument was developed to carry out an activity in the Scientific Methodology course of the Postgraduate Program in Management & Knowledge Organization at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), in the first semester of 2019. The purpose of the instrument was to analyze the adherence of a scientific research to the recommendations of Creswell (2014) and other works on scientific methodology. It consists of 9 items, subdivided into 67 criteria, in the form of questions. For evaluation, each criterion is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with a value of 1 corresponding to the less precise presentation of the criterion and a value of 5 to the more accurate presentation. The option “Not applicable (N / A)” was inserted in the instrument for those criteria in which the evaluator believes that it does not match the structural proposal of the research. Results: After describing the basis for its development, the instrument is presented. Next it was tested through the evaluation of a doctoral dissertation and a master thesis. Conclusions: Results show on that the instrument was adequate for the purpose proposed, that is, the evaluation of research reports of theses and dissertations, with the recommendation that the style and specificity of each investigation must be taken into account.Objetivo: Este artigo tem como objetivo apresentar um instrumento de análise crítica de um tipo específico de relatórios de pesquisa: teses e dissertações. Metodologia: Trata-se de um instrumento desenvolvido para realização de uma atividade da disciplina Metodologia de Pesquisa do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Gestão & Organização do Conhecimento da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), no primeiro semestre de 2019. A finalidade do instrumento foi analisar a aderência de uma pesquisa científica às recomendações de Creswell (2014) e outras obras que abordam a metodologia científica. É composto por nove itens, subdivididos em 67 critérios, em formato de perguntas. Para avaliação, em cada critério é necessária uma marcação em uma escala do tipo Likert, de 5 pontos, ou seja, o valor 1 é correspondente à apresentação mais fraca do critério e o valor 5, à mais forte. Como recurso alternativo, foi inserida no instrumento a opção “Não se aplica (N/A)” para aqueles critérios em que o avaliador entende que não condiz com a proposta estrutural da pesquisa. Resultados: Após o relato das bases para o desenvolvimento e exposição do instrumento, o artigo apresenta seu teste por meio da sua aplicação na avaliação de uma tese e de uma dissertação. Conclusões: Conclui-se que o instrumento se mostrou adequado para a finalidade proposta, avaliação de relatórios de pesquisa de teses e dissertações, com a recomendação de que o estilo do autor e a especificidade de cada investigação devam ser levados em consideração.Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC2021-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/xmlapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/7867810.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78678Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 years giving voice to Science"; 01-25Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 años dando voz a la ciencia"; 01-25Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 (2021): A Encontros Bibli "25 anos dando voz à Ciência"; 01-251518-2924reponame:Encontros Bibliinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45817https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/53824https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45852https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45776Copyright (c) 2021 Nivaldo Calixto Ribeiro, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Santos, Gracilene Maria de Carvalho, Rômulo de Barros Teixeira, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Maculan, Beatriz Valadares Cendónhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Nivaldo CalixtoSantos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Cendón, Beatriz Valadares 2023-07-19T11:02:04Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/78678Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/oaiencontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br1518-29241518-2924opendoar:2023-07-19T11:02:04Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: Instrumento para análise crítica de relatórios de pesquisas: teses e dissertações: |
title |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: |
spellingShingle |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto Comunicação científica Metodologia científica Trabalhos acadêmicos Scientific communication Scientific methodology Academic works |
title_short |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: |
title_full |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: |
title_fullStr |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: |
title_full_unstemmed |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: |
title_sort |
Instrument for critical analysis of research reports: thesis and dissertations: |
author |
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Cendón, Beatriz Valadares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Cendón, Beatriz Valadares |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Nivaldo Calixto Santos, Sarah Rúbia de Oliveira Carvalho, Gracilene Maria de Teixeira, Rômulo de Barros Maculan, Benildes Coura Moreira dos Santos Cendón, Beatriz Valadares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Comunicação científica Metodologia científica Trabalhos acadêmicos Scientific communication Scientific methodology Academic works |
topic |
Comunicação científica Metodologia científica Trabalhos acadêmicos Scientific communication Scientific methodology Academic works |
description |
Objective: this article aims to present a tool for critical analysis of a specific type of research report: theses and dissertations. Methods: this instrument was developed to carry out an activity in the Scientific Methodology course of the Postgraduate Program in Management & Knowledge Organization at the Federal University of Minas Gerais (PPGGOC/UFMG), in the first semester of 2019. The purpose of the instrument was to analyze the adherence of a scientific research to the recommendations of Creswell (2014) and other works on scientific methodology. It consists of 9 items, subdivided into 67 criteria, in the form of questions. For evaluation, each criterion is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale, with a value of 1 corresponding to the less precise presentation of the criterion and a value of 5 to the more accurate presentation. The option “Not applicable (N / A)” was inserted in the instrument for those criteria in which the evaluator believes that it does not match the structural proposal of the research. Results: After describing the basis for its development, the instrument is presented. Next it was tested through the evaluation of a doctoral dissertation and a master thesis. Conclusions: Results show on that the instrument was adequate for the purpose proposed, that is, the evaluation of research reports of theses and dissertations, with the recommendation that the style and specificity of each investigation must be taken into account. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-03-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678 10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78678 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1518-2924.2021.e78678 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45817 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/53824 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45852 https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/view/78678/45776 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf text/xml application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Departamento de Ciência da Informação – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 years giving voice to Science"; 01-25 Encontros Bibli: revista electrónica de bibliotecología y ciencias de la información.; Vol. 26 (2021): Encontros Bibli "25 años dando voz a la ciencia"; 01-25 Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de biblioteconomia e ciência da informação; v. 26 (2021): A Encontros Bibli "25 anos dando voz à Ciência"; 01-25 1518-2924 reponame:Encontros Bibli instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Encontros Bibli |
collection |
Encontros Bibli |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Encontros Bibli - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
encontrosbibli@contato.ufsc.br||portaldeperiodicos.bu@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1797067779017277440 |