CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2011 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149 |
Resumo: | This text aims to do a critic to the knowledge production on the subject of professionaladjustment of physical education, analyzing the scientific production that defendsConfef/Crefs System, on theses and dissertations published from 1998 to 2009. A surveyof sources at the Bank of CAPES thesis, we selected 14 papers which deal with thesubject, which are guided by favorable positions (defending Confef/Crefs) and contraryto the profession/professional adjustment of physical education. We find categoriesfor the analysis of production and point limits philosophical, scientific and practical inknowledge production by those who defend the professional adjustment. |
id |
UFSC-2_1302b5d4496f549e1036f49d18e3329f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/21663 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-2 |
network_name_str |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEMCrítica à regulamentação da profissão e à produção científica defensora do sistema CONFEF/CREFsThis text aims to do a critic to the knowledge production on the subject of professionaladjustment of physical education, analyzing the scientific production that defendsConfef/Crefs System, on theses and dissertations published from 1998 to 2009. A surveyof sources at the Bank of CAPES thesis, we selected 14 papers which deal with thesubject, which are guided by favorable positions (defending Confef/Crefs) and contraryto the profession/professional adjustment of physical education. We find categoriesfor the analysis of production and point limits philosophical, scientific and practical inknowledge production by those who defend the professional adjustment.Este texto tem por finalidade realizar a crítica à produção do conhecimento acerca da temática da regulamentação da profissão da educação física, analisando as produções científicas defensoras do Sistema Confef/Crefs, em forma de teses e dissertações publicadas no período de 1998 até 2009. Após levantamento de fontes no Banco de Teses da CAPES, foram selecionadas 14 dissertações e teses que tratam do tema, que orientam-se por posições favoráveis (que defendem o Confef/Crefs) e contrárias à regulamentação da profissão/profissional de educação física. Levantamos categorias para a análise das produções e apontamos limites filosóficos, científicos e práticos da produção do conhecimento daqueles que defendem a regulamentação da profissão.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2011-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2011v23n36p14910.5007/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149Motrivivência; n. 36 (2011): Educação Física e o Mundo do Trabalho II; 149-1682175-80420103-4111reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149/19648Gil da Silva, GuilhermeFrizzo, Giovanni Felipe Ernstinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:18:52Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/21663Revistahttp://www.periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/oai||giovani.pires@ufsc.br2175-80420103-4111opendoar:2022-11-21T14:18:52Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM Crítica à regulamentação da profissão e à produção científica defensora do sistema CONFEF/CREFs |
title |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM |
spellingShingle |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM Gil da Silva, Guilherme |
title_short |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM |
title_full |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM |
title_fullStr |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM |
title_full_unstemmed |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM |
title_sort |
CRITIC TO REGULATION OF THE PROFESSION AND TO THE SCIENTIFIC PRODUCTION WHICH DEFENDS THE CONFEF/CREFS SYSTEM |
author |
Gil da Silva, Guilherme |
author_facet |
Gil da Silva, Guilherme Frizzo, Giovanni Felipe Ernst |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frizzo, Giovanni Felipe Ernst |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gil da Silva, Guilherme Frizzo, Giovanni Felipe Ernst |
description |
This text aims to do a critic to the knowledge production on the subject of professionaladjustment of physical education, analyzing the scientific production that defendsConfef/Crefs System, on theses and dissertations published from 1998 to 2009. A surveyof sources at the Bank of CAPES thesis, we selected 14 papers which deal with thesubject, which are guided by favorable positions (defending Confef/Crefs) and contraryto the profession/professional adjustment of physical education. We find categoriesfor the analysis of production and point limits philosophical, scientific and practical inknowledge production by those who defend the professional adjustment. |
publishDate |
2011 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2011-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149 10.5007/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/motrivivencia/article/view/2175-8042.2011v23n36p149/19648 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Motrivivência; n. 36 (2011): Educação Física e o Mundo do Trabalho II; 149-168 2175-8042 0103-4111 reponame:Motrivivência (Florianópolis) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
collection |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Motrivivência (Florianópolis) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||giovani.pires@ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434856063631360 |