Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151 |
Resumo: | This article intends to discuss Brazilian judicial review from the standpoint of deliberative (or procedural) democracy and constitutionalism. It focuses first on the relation between procedural democracy and judicial review stressing the role of the latter in defining and protecting basic rights in order to guarantee the democratic procedure. Second it takes constitutionalism as a theory that emphasizes the protection of basic rights even if it limits the democratic procedure. Then, it shows that the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 has adopted a conception of substantialdemocracy that leads to the limitation of executive and legislative powers by the judiciary through judicial review in order to protect basic rights. |
id |
UFSC-3_4cffbc6a687d018516518278749024f4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14994 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-3 |
network_name_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracyJurisdição Constitucional brasileira: entre Constitucionalismo e DemocraciaThis article intends to discuss Brazilian judicial review from the standpoint of deliberative (or procedural) democracy and constitutionalism. It focuses first on the relation between procedural democracy and judicial review stressing the role of the latter in defining and protecting basic rights in order to guarantee the democratic procedure. Second it takes constitutionalism as a theory that emphasizes the protection of basic rights even if it limits the democratic procedure. Then, it shows that the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 has adopted a conception of substantialdemocracy that leads to the limitation of executive and legislative powers by the judiciary through judicial review in order to protect basic rights.http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151O presente artigo analisa o papel da Jurisdição Constitucional brasileira a partir das teorias da Democracia Procedimental e do Constitucionalismo. Primeiramente estuda-se a maneira como os teóricos da Democracia Procedimental tratam a possibilidade de atuação da Jurisdição Constitucional na proteção e definição dos direitos fundamentais para a garantia do processo democrático. Em um segundo momento enfoca-se o Constitucionalismo como teoria que prioriza a proteção dos direitos fundamentais, mesmo que isto implique limitação do processo democrático. Por fim demonstra-se que a Constituição brasileira de 1988 adotou uma concepção de democracia substantiva, o que leva à possibilidade da Jurisdição Constitucional limitar os Poderes Executivo e Legislativo visando a proteção dos direitos fundamentais.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2010-09-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p15110.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-1762177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151/13675Kozicki, KatyaBarboza, Estefânia Maria de Queirozinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-11-21T14:15:54Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/14994Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:34:21.225872Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy Jurisdição Constitucional brasileira: entre Constitucionalismo e Democracia |
title |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy |
spellingShingle |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy Kozicki, Katya |
title_short |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy |
title_full |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy |
title_fullStr |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy |
title_sort |
Brazilian constitutional jurisdiction: between constitutionalism and democracy |
author |
Kozicki, Katya |
author_facet |
Kozicki, Katya Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Kozicki, Katya Barboza, Estefânia Maria de Queiroz |
description |
This article intends to discuss Brazilian judicial review from the standpoint of deliberative (or procedural) democracy and constitutionalism. It focuses first on the relation between procedural democracy and judicial review stressing the role of the latter in defining and protecting basic rights in order to guarantee the democratic procedure. Second it takes constitutionalism as a theory that emphasizes the protection of basic rights even if it limits the democratic procedure. Then, it shows that the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 has adopted a conception of substantialdemocracy that leads to the limitation of executive and legislative powers by the judiciary through judicial review in order to protect basic rights. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-09-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151 10.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2008v29n56p151/13675 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176 Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176 Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; V. 29 n. 56 (2008); 151-176 2177-7055 0101-9562 reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789434794931650560 |