The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima, Renata Albuquerque
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Magalhães, Atila de Alencar Araripe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105
Resumo: Science goes through constant refutations. Generally, these refutations eventually cause science to evolve. It happens that there is no evolution without overcoming what Bachelard called “epistemological obstacles”. When the Judiciary modifies its jurisprudence there is a breakdown of paradigms. Therefore, Law evolves. The following article is about the need to constantly overcome the predicted epistemological obstacles, correlating with the change in the jurisprudence. Therefore, Thomas Kuhn’s work was also studied. The methodology used is bibliographical and analytical.
id UFSC-3_b1e2bce2ee6d56dc72ddfd0571152be1
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/54975
network_acronym_str UFSC-3
network_name_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of LawA Contínua Necessidade do Juiz em Transpor Obstáculos Epistemológicos e Superar Paradigmas na Construção do Conhecimento Científico do DireitoScience goes through constant refutations. Generally, these refutations eventually cause science to evolve. It happens that there is no evolution without overcoming what Bachelard called “epistemological obstacles”. When the Judiciary modifies its jurisprudence there is a breakdown of paradigms. Therefore, Law evolves. The following article is about the need to constantly overcome the predicted epistemological obstacles, correlating with the change in the jurisprudence. Therefore, Thomas Kuhn’s work was also studied. The methodology used is bibliographical and analytical.A Ciência passa por constantes refutações. Geralmente, essas refutações acabam por fazer com que a Ciência evolua. Ocorre que não há evolução sem superação do que Bachelard denominou de “obstáculos epistemológicos”. Quando o Poder Judiciário modifica a sua jurisprudência ocorre uma quebra de paradigmas. Logo, o Direito evolui. O artigo que se segue versa justamente sobre a necessidade de se superar constantemente os preditos obstáculos epistemológicos, correlacionando-os com a mudança de jurisprudência do Poder Judiciário. Para tanto, estudou-se também os constructos de Thomas Kuhn. A metodologia utilizada é bibliográfica e analítica.Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina2019-06-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2019v40n81p10510.5007/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 40 No. 81 (2019); 105-130Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 40 Núm. 81 (2019); 105-130Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 40 n. 81 (2019); 105-1302177-70550101-9562reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105/39986Copyright (c) 2019 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLima, Renata AlbuquerqueMagalhães, Atila de Alencar Araripe2019-07-26T00:06:15Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/54975Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequenciaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/oai||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br2177-70550101-9562opendoar:2022-11-21T11:35:03.755321Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
A Contínua Necessidade do Juiz em Transpor Obstáculos Epistemológicos e Superar Paradigmas na Construção do Conhecimento Científico do Direito
title The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
spellingShingle The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
Lima, Renata Albuquerque
title_short The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
title_full The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
title_fullStr The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
title_full_unstemmed The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
title_sort The Continuous Need of the Judge in Surpassing Epistemological Obstacles and Overcoming Paradigms in the Construction of the Scientific Knowledge of Law
author Lima, Renata Albuquerque
author_facet Lima, Renata Albuquerque
Magalhães, Atila de Alencar Araripe
author_role author
author2 Magalhães, Atila de Alencar Araripe
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Renata Albuquerque
Magalhães, Atila de Alencar Araripe
description Science goes through constant refutations. Generally, these refutations eventually cause science to evolve. It happens that there is no evolution without overcoming what Bachelard called “epistemological obstacles”. When the Judiciary modifies its jurisprudence there is a breakdown of paradigms. Therefore, Law evolves. The following article is about the need to constantly overcome the predicted epistemological obstacles, correlating with the change in the jurisprudence. Therefore, Thomas Kuhn’s work was also studied. The methodology used is bibliographical and analytical.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-06-12
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105
10.5007/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105
identifier_str_mv 10.5007/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/sequencia/article/view/2177-7055.2019v40n81p105/39986
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Seqüência - Legal and Political Studies; Vol. 40 No. 81 (2019); 105-130
Revista Seqüência: Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; Vol. 40 Núm. 81 (2019); 105-130
Seqüência Estudos Jurídicos e Políticos; v. 40 n. 81 (2019); 105-130
2177-7055
0101-9562
reponame:Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron:UFSC
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
instacron_str UFSC
institution UFSC
reponame_str Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
collection Sequência (Florianópolis. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sequência (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sequencia@funjab.ufsc.br
_version_ 1789434803007782912

Registros relacionados