Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80461 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to analyze the relationships between agnotology (social construction of ignorance) and the precautionary principle (PP) from two perspectives. The first one has to do with the objection according to which some PP defenders would have used ignorance construction strategies. Drawing from Daniel Steel's work, I show how they undermine an internal criterion to the principle itself: proportionality. I then comment on public documents that show agnotology strategies by sectors of the industry both on PP and on scientific results so that it could not be applied. Such an exposition has not yet been done on the literature about PP. In doing so, I aim to contribute to identify the presence of agnotology on debates about PP. |
id |
UFSC-5_0f65cca8fcf2daa4dc7e2b9c367638fd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/80461 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Agnotology and the Precautionary PrincipleAgnotologia e o Princípio da PrecauçãoThis paper aims to analyze the relationships between agnotology (social construction of ignorance) and the precautionary principle (PP) from two perspectives. The first one has to do with the objection according to which some PP defenders would have used ignorance construction strategies. Drawing from Daniel Steel's work, I show how they undermine an internal criterion to the principle itself: proportionality. I then comment on public documents that show agnotology strategies by sectors of the industry both on PP and on scientific results so that it could not be applied. Such an exposition has not yet been done on the literature about PP. In doing so, I aim to contribute to identify the presence of agnotology on debates about PP.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar as relações entre agnotologia (construção social da ignorância) e o princípio da precaução (PP) sob dois aspectos. O primeiro diz respeito à crítica de que parcela dos defensores do PP teria utilizado estratégias de construção de ignorância. A partir do trabalho do filósofo Daniel Steel, mostro como elas enfraquecem um critério interno ao próprio princípio: a proporcionalidade. Sob o segundo aspecto, comento documentos tornados públicos que evidenciam estratégias de agnotologia por setores da indústria tanto sobre o PP como sobre resultados científicos para que ele não fosse aplicado. Semelhante exposição ainda não foi realizada na literatura especializada no PP. A partir dessa análise, busco contribuir para identificar estratégias de agnotologia em debates sobre o PP.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2021-11-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed article, edited by guest editor Débora Aymoré and by editor Ivan F. da CunhaArtigo revisado por pares, editado pela editora convidada Débora Aymoré e pelo editor Ivan F. da Cunhaapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8046110.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80461Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2021); 289-304Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2021); 289-304Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 25 n. 2 (2021); 289-3041808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCporhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80461/47657Copyright (c) 2021 Pedro Bravo de Souzahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSouza, Pedro Bravo de2021-11-23T12:48:21Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/80461Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2021-11-23T12:48:21Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle Agnotologia e o Princípio da Precaução |
title |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle |
spellingShingle |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle Souza, Pedro Bravo de |
title_short |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle |
title_full |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle |
title_fullStr |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle |
title_full_unstemmed |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle |
title_sort |
Agnotology and the Precautionary Principle |
author |
Souza, Pedro Bravo de |
author_facet |
Souza, Pedro Bravo de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Pedro Bravo de |
description |
This paper aims to analyze the relationships between agnotology (social construction of ignorance) and the precautionary principle (PP) from two perspectives. The first one has to do with the objection according to which some PP defenders would have used ignorance construction strategies. Drawing from Daniel Steel's work, I show how they undermine an internal criterion to the principle itself: proportionality. I then comment on public documents that show agnotology strategies by sectors of the industry both on PP and on scientific results so that it could not be applied. Such an exposition has not yet been done on the literature about PP. In doing so, I aim to contribute to identify the presence of agnotology on debates about PP. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-11-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed article, edited by guest editor Débora Aymoré and by editor Ivan F. da Cunha Artigo revisado por pares, editado pela editora convidada Débora Aymoré e pelo editor Ivan F. da Cunha |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80461 10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80461 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80461 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2021.e80461 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/80461/47657 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pedro Bravo de Souza http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Pedro Bravo de Souza http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 No. 2 (2021); 289-304 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 25 Núm. 2 (2021); 289-304 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 25 n. 2 (2021); 289-304 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435113836118016 |