An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/81977 |
Resumo: | The subject of this essay is the classical problem of induction, which is sometimes attributed to David Hume and called “the Humean Problem of Induction.” Here, I examine a certain sort of Neo-Aristotelian solution to the problem, which appeals to the concept of natural kinds in its response to the inductive skeptic. This position is most notably represented by Howard Sankey and Marc Lange. The purpose of this paper is partly destructive and partly constructive. I raise two questions. The first is: Are the natural kind solutions to the problem successful? The first thesis of this paper is that they are not, and I will show how and why they fail. And the second question I raise here is: Is there nonetheless some alternative Neo-Aristotelian solution to the problem which is successful and can overcome the shortcomings endemic to the Sankey-Lange account? The second thesis is that there is, and I’ll attempt to sketch one. My stance here may be summarized by saying that, while I agree with Sankey and Lange that the problem of induction can be adequately resolved, and while I am on the whole sympathetic with the Aristotelian spirit of their account(s), I am, for all that, dissatisfied with the letter of them. Nothing short of a more thoroughgoing Aristotelianism about the epistemology of induction will do. |
id |
UFSC-5_34874bee6bfcc7d20fcbd76b9a5d3134 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/81977 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of InductionProblem of Inductionnatural kindsdirect realismsubstantial formscontents of perceptionconcept formationThe subject of this essay is the classical problem of induction, which is sometimes attributed to David Hume and called “the Humean Problem of Induction.” Here, I examine a certain sort of Neo-Aristotelian solution to the problem, which appeals to the concept of natural kinds in its response to the inductive skeptic. This position is most notably represented by Howard Sankey and Marc Lange. The purpose of this paper is partly destructive and partly constructive. I raise two questions. The first is: Are the natural kind solutions to the problem successful? The first thesis of this paper is that they are not, and I will show how and why they fail. And the second question I raise here is: Is there nonetheless some alternative Neo-Aristotelian solution to the problem which is successful and can overcome the shortcomings endemic to the Sankey-Lange account? The second thesis is that there is, and I’ll attempt to sketch one. My stance here may be summarized by saying that, while I agree with Sankey and Lange that the problem of induction can be adequately resolved, and while I am on the whole sympathetic with the Aristotelian spirit of their account(s), I am, for all that, dissatisfied with the letter of them. Nothing short of a more thoroughgoing Aristotelianism about the epistemology of induction will do. Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2022-08-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/8197710.5007/1808-1711.2022.e81977Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2022); 205-232Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2022); 205-232Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 2 (2022); 205-2321808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/81977/51419Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Dennis Bassfordhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBassford, Andrew Dennis2022-08-19T16:53:29Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/81977Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2022-08-19T16:53:29Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
title |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
spellingShingle |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction Bassford, Andrew Dennis Problem of Induction natural kinds direct realism substantial forms contents of perception concept formation |
title_short |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
title_full |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
title_fullStr |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
title_sort |
An Intuitive Solution to the Problem of Induction |
author |
Bassford, Andrew Dennis |
author_facet |
Bassford, Andrew Dennis |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bassford, Andrew Dennis |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Problem of Induction natural kinds direct realism substantial forms contents of perception concept formation |
topic |
Problem of Induction natural kinds direct realism substantial forms contents of perception concept formation |
description |
The subject of this essay is the classical problem of induction, which is sometimes attributed to David Hume and called “the Humean Problem of Induction.” Here, I examine a certain sort of Neo-Aristotelian solution to the problem, which appeals to the concept of natural kinds in its response to the inductive skeptic. This position is most notably represented by Howard Sankey and Marc Lange. The purpose of this paper is partly destructive and partly constructive. I raise two questions. The first is: Are the natural kind solutions to the problem successful? The first thesis of this paper is that they are not, and I will show how and why they fail. And the second question I raise here is: Is there nonetheless some alternative Neo-Aristotelian solution to the problem which is successful and can overcome the shortcomings endemic to the Sankey-Lange account? The second thesis is that there is, and I’ll attempt to sketch one. My stance here may be summarized by saying that, while I agree with Sankey and Lange that the problem of induction can be adequately resolved, and while I am on the whole sympathetic with the Aristotelian spirit of their account(s), I am, for all that, dissatisfied with the letter of them. Nothing short of a more thoroughgoing Aristotelianism about the epistemology of induction will do. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-08-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/81977 10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e81977 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/81977 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2022.e81977 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/81977/51419 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Dennis Bassford http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Dennis Bassford http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 No. 2 (2022); 205-232 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 26 Núm. 2 (2022); 205-232 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 26 n. 2 (2022); 205-232 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435113846603776 |