Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265 |
Resumo: | In several important works in ethics, Hillary Putnam criticizes the traditional fact/value dichotomy, which is based on the Humean question whether ought follows from is. More recently, Putnam even declared the collapse of this dichotomy calling once again for rethinking the last dogma of empiricism, namely the positivist creed that facts are objective and values are subjective. The aim of this work is to reassess Putnam’s main arguments to show the entanglement between facts and values. Putnam is right in many of his criticisms, but it is not clear also how he avoids reductionist monistic naturalism, which he considers an “inadequate philosophy”. Using his pragmatic pluralism inspired by Wittgenstein, I will try to show that we have reasons to make a distinction between facts and values. |
id |
UFSC-5_d8db9a04acd2acdebe10292616146d9e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/32914 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSC-5 |
network_name_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic EthicsDisentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic EthicsIn several important works in ethics, Hillary Putnam criticizes the traditional fact/value dichotomy, which is based on the Humean question whether ought follows from is. More recently, Putnam even declared the collapse of this dichotomy calling once again for rethinking the last dogma of empiricism, namely the positivist creed that facts are objective and values are subjective. The aim of this work is to reassess Putnam’s main arguments to show the entanglement between facts and values. Putnam is right in many of his criticisms, but it is not clear also how he avoids reductionist monistic naturalism, which he considers an “inadequate philosophy”. Using his pragmatic pluralism inspired by Wittgenstein, I will try to show that we have reasons to make a distinction between facts and values.Em várias obras importantes na ética, Hillary Putnam criticou a dicotomia tradicional entre fatos e valores a qual está baseada na questão humeana de saber se dever segue-se de ser. Recentemente, Putnam declarou até mesmo o colapso dessa dicotomia e clamou novamente para se repensar o último dogma do empiricismo, a saber, a crença positivista de que fatos são objetivos e valores subjetivos. O objetivo deste trabalho é reavaliar os seus principais argumentos para mostrar que fatos e valores então entrelaçados. Putnam está certo em muitas de suas críticas, mas também não é muito claro como ele evita o naturalismo monista reducionista, que ele considera uma “filosofia inadequada”. Usando o seu pluralismo pragmático inspirado em Wittgenstein, vou procurar mostrar que há boas razões para manter uma distinção entre fatos e valores.Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC2013-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p26510.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013); 265-274Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2013); 265-274Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 17 n. 2 (2013); 265-2741808-17111414-4247reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online)instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)instacron:UFSCenghttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265/26440Copyright (c) 2021 Darlei Dall’Agnolinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDall’Agnol, Darlei2019-09-13T09:08:45Zoai:periodicos.ufsc.br:article/32914Revistahttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principiaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/oaiprincipia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br1808-17111414-4247opendoar:2019-09-13T09:08:45Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
title |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
spellingShingle |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics Dall’Agnol, Darlei |
title_short |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
title_full |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
title_fullStr |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
title_full_unstemmed |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
title_sort |
Disentangling Facts and Values: an Analysis of Putnam’s Pragmatic Ethics |
author |
Dall’Agnol, Darlei |
author_facet |
Dall’Agnol, Darlei |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dall’Agnol, Darlei |
description |
In several important works in ethics, Hillary Putnam criticizes the traditional fact/value dichotomy, which is based on the Humean question whether ought follows from is. More recently, Putnam even declared the collapse of this dichotomy calling once again for rethinking the last dogma of empiricism, namely the positivist creed that facts are objective and values are subjective. The aim of this work is to reassess Putnam’s main arguments to show the entanglement between facts and values. Putnam is right in many of his criticisms, but it is not clear also how he avoids reductionist monistic naturalism, which he considers an “inadequate philosophy”. Using his pragmatic pluralism inspired by Wittgenstein, I will try to show that we have reasons to make a distinction between facts and values. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265 10.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5007/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/principia/article/view/1808-1711.2013v17n2p265/26440 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Darlei Dall’Agnol info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Darlei Dall’Agnol |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Federal University of Santa Catarina – UFSC |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 No. 2 (2013); 265-274 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; Vol. 17 Núm. 2 (2013); 265-274 Principia: an international journal of epistemology; v. 17 n. 2 (2013); 265-274 1808-1711 1414-4247 reponame:Principia (Florianópolis. Online) instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) instacron:UFSC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
instacron_str |
UFSC |
institution |
UFSC |
reponame_str |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
collection |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Principia (Florianópolis. Online) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
principia@contato.ufsc.br||principia@contato.ufsc.br |
_version_ |
1789435107596042240 |